Brilli the Ant has been experimenting with diet pills, and due to some unforeseen complications associated with ant physiology, he has developed a truly ferocious metabolism!
In the midst of a desperate search for sustenance, Brilli spots a piece of food out on the end of a very long, rigid plank. The plank is anchored to a wall on the other end.
At time , Brilli climbs onto the plank at the anchor point. He proceeds down the plank at a constant speed of His mass diminishes with time as follows: How far down the plank (in meters) is Brilli when his weight exerts the maximum torque about the anchor point?
Note: Neglect any irregularities in the downward force due to Brilli's movement. Assume that the downward force is a function of his weight alone. Assume that Brilli can be modeled as a point-particle.
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
The torque due to Brilli's weight is τ = M g x = M 0 e − α t g x = M 0 g x e − v α x . It varies with position x according to d x d τ = M 0 g e − v α x ( 1 − v α x ) . At the maximum, this derivative is zero. Thus 0 = d x d τ = 1 − v α x ; x = α v = 0 . 0 0 1 s − 1 0 . 0 2 m / s = 2 0 m .
Incidentally, this is a good example to give an intuitive interpretation of the use of the product rule.
The torque M g x due to Brilli's weight undergoes to kinds of change. For every kilogram lost by Brilli, it decreases by g x . For every meter walked, it increases by M g . At first, the increase is stronger than the decrease. Later it is the other way around. The maximum is reached when these two factors balance: g x ⋅ ( rate of weight loss ) = M g ⋅ ( rate of walking ) .
Now Brilli loses weight at a rate α M and gains distance at a rate v . Thus g x ⋅ α M = M g ⋅ v . This leads to the same conclusion as before, namely x = v / α .