You are in charge of building a small ski jump on a hill that slopes down 2 0 ∘ below the horizontal. You want to maximize the distance the skier will travel down the hill while in the air. The jump will launch the skier off the hill at an angle θ above the horizontal. What should θ be in degrees to maximize the distance the skier travels down the slope while in the air?
Problem submitted by Saad H.
Details and assumptions
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
Ah, forgot to mention. As a general rule, it's fairly clear that the angle to the horizontal you should go at will be one half the complement of the "incline angle" of the hill.
same
According to the question, the diagram is as follows:
We rotate the figure 2 0 o anticlockwise. In this figure, only the portion where ski jump takes place is shown. Here, α = θ + 2 0 o
According to the above figure,
Total change in height=0. Let the time of flight be t and the velocity of the skier be u .
∴ 0 = u s i n α t − 2 1 g c o s 2 0 o t 2 ⟹ t = g c o s 2 0 o 2 u s i n α (t can't be 0).
Range= u c o s α t + 2 1 g s i n 2 0 o t 2
⟹ R a n g e = g c o s 2 2 0 o 2 u 2 s i n α ( c o s α c o s 2 0 o + s i n α s i n 2 0 o )
⟹ R a n g e = g c o s 2 2 0 o 2 u 2 s i n α c o s ( α − 2 0 o )
Hence, range will be maximum if s i n α c o s ( α − 2 0 o ) is maximum.
Differentiating the above expression w.r.t α we get:
c o s α c o s ( α − 2 0 o ) − s i n α s i n ( α − 2 0 o ) = c o s ( 2 α − 2 0 o )
For maximum value, the above expression should be equal to 0 which gives α = 5 5 o . Since α = θ + 2 0 o , we get θ = 3 5 o .
Great clear solution, thank you!
LaTeX suggestion: use
\sin (\alpha )
instead of just
sin \alpha
. That makes it look better. :)
Let d be the distance travelled on the ramp, and ϕ be the angle of incline. Firstly, if θ = 0 , then then d will be shorter. if theta increases, d increases, but up to a certain point. After that (for instance if θ = 9 0 , then d will be 0. So we are trying to find the maximum of d using differentiation.
x f = v i cos θ ⋅ t = d cos ϕ [ 1 ]
y f = v i sin θ ⋅ t − 2 1 g t 2 = − d sin ϕ [ 2 ]
From [ 1 ] : t = v i cos θ d cos ϕ [ 3 ]
Substituting [ 3 ] into [ 2 ] :
v i sin θ ⋅ ( v i cos θ d cos ϕ ) − 2 1 g ( v i cos θ d cos ϕ ) 2 = − d sin ϕ
d cos ϕ tan θ − 2 v i 2 cos 2 θ g d 2 cos 2 ϕ = − d sin ϕ
It will be useful to express the equation in terms of d , since we want to find the maximum of d so we can proceed to divide the whole equation by d .
cos ϕ tan θ − 2 v i 2 cos 2 θ g d cos 2 ϕ = − sin ϕ
Now we will express the equation in terms of d .
d = g c o s 2 ϕ 2 v i 2 cos 2 θ ( cos ϕ tan θ + sin ϕ )
Simplifying it we get
d = g cos ϕ v i 2 sin 2 θ + g cos ϕ 2 v i 2 cos 2 θ tan ϕ
In order to find maximum θ , we have to differentiate, keeping in mind that ϕ is constant, and the only variables are d and θ .
d θ d d = g cos ϕ v i 2 ⋅ 2 cos 2 θ − g cos ϕ 2 v i 2 tan ϕ ⋅ sin 2 θ
Setting d θ d d = 0 , to find our maximum, we get
g cos ϕ v i 2 ⋅ 2 cos 2 θ − g cos ϕ 2 v i 2 tan ϕ ⋅ sin 2 θ = 0
2 v i 2 cos 2 θ − 2 v i 2 tan ϕ sin 2 θ = 0
cos 2 θ − tan ϕ sin 2 θ = 0
Using the R-Formulae trigonometric identity
tan 2 ϕ + 1 cos ( 2 θ + ϕ ) = 0
c o s ( 2 θ + ϕ ) = 0
2 θ + ϕ = 9 0 ∘
θ = 4 5 ∘ − 2 ϕ
Substituting ϕ = 2 0 ∘ , we get θ = 3 5 ∘
The way I solved it was actually extremely simple.
We know that if we want to find the angle that maximizes the horizontal displacement, like a baseball being thrown across a flat field, we just get the angle that bisects the two extreme angles (angles that will make the displacement 0), which in that case would be 45 degrees.
So basically you just get the angle directly in the middle of the two.
In this problem, if we imagine the slope down the hill at an angle 0, then the other extreme will be 20 degrees + 90 degrees, which is 110 degrees. Divide that in two and you get 55 degrees. So, if the angle in between is 55 degrees away from the slope, we can just subtract 20 degrees to get the angle away from what we initially deemed as 0 degrees.
Note that we won't have to differentiate w.r.t θ to find the value which maximizes the range. You can express d as d = g cos 2 ϕ 2 v i 2 ( sin ( 2 θ + ϕ ) + sin ϕ ) which obviously attains its maximum when sin ( 2 θ + ϕ ) = 1 ⟹ θ = 2 9 0 ∘ − ϕ
Consider the trajectory in the Cartesian plane. Let the ski jump be at the point ( 0 , 0 ) . Then the trajectory of the skier can be described as
$$y = -\frac{g}{2v^2 \cos{\theta}} x^2 + x\tan{\theta}$$
and the hill as
$$y = - x \tan{\alpha}$$.
Equating y 's to find the x -coordinate of the landing point (and discarding the trivial case x = 0 ) we get
$$x = \frac{(\tan{\theta} + \tan{\alpha}) 2v^2 \cos^2{\alpha}}{g}$$.
The distance down the slope d in this case is just d = x / cos α .
To find θ , maximise d w.r.t. θ (which is a lengthy and quite boring derivation), from where it follows that θ ≈ 0 . 6 1 rad ≈ 3 5 ∘ .
Just a remark, instead of ≈ there should be = since the problem is solvable exactly.
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
Whoa this problem was fun! Ok, so here's watcha do (at least what I did!):
First, we draw a picture of the situation (you, the reader, should do this!). We have an initial velocity v for this skier, and it makes an angle θ with the horizontal, so let's split the velocity into two components: the horizontal, or x component v cos θ and the vertical, or y component v sin θ . Now we make the equations of motion for the two dimensions:
v sin θ t − 2 1 g t 2 = − y
v cos θ t = x
Now we find t as a function of x: t = v cos θ x and replace this solution into our equation for the y dimension (I skip the basic algebra):
tan θ x − ( v cos θ ) 2 2 1 g x 2 = − y
If you drew a picture (smart thing to do!), you'll see that we can make a simple relationship between y and x, since tan 2 0 = x y . Mainly, that y = x tan 2 0 , so we put this into our last equation:
tan θ x − ( v cos θ ) 2 2 1 g x 2 = − x tan 2 0
And doing some simple algebra, we find that
x = g ( tan θ + tan 2 0 ) 2 ( v cos θ ) 2
Up next, we take the derivative of x with respect to θ and equal it to zero. We do this because we want to see for which angle θ , x is at its maximum (for which angle does the skier go farthest?). Pretty simple derivatives for the most part, so I leave that to you. As a final result, we have that
0 = 1 − 2 sin 2 θ − 2 sin θ cos θ tan 2 0
Now we'll need some trigonometric identities voodoo to fix this messy-looking thing. Remember that sin 2 θ = 2 1 ( 1 − cos 2 θ ) ? No? Well it's true! Also, a more well-known identity: 2 sin θ cos θ = sin 2 θ . Now things are looking much more interesting! We replace some stuff, and arrive at
tan 2 θ = tan 2 0 1
2 θ = 7 0
θ = 3 5
Whoooo!