Which of the following is greater? 1 0 0 1 + 9 9 9 or 2 1 0 0 0
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
Nice solution really amazing keep it up
f ( x ) = x is (strictly) concave since f ′ ( x ) = 2 x 1 is decreasing. Now 1 0 0 0 > 2 9 9 9 + 1 0 0 1 by definition of concavity.
1 0 0 1 + 9 9 9 = 1 0 0 1 + 9 9 9 + 2 1 0 0 1 ∗ 9 9 9 = 2 0 0 0 + 2 1 0 0 0 2 − 1 2 1 0 0 0 = 4 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 + 2 1 0 0 0 2 − 1 ? 4 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 + 2 1 0 0 0 2 − 1 ? 4 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 − 1 ? 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 − 1 ? 1 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 2 − 1 < 1 0 0 0 2
I just square both sides,
1001+999+2V(1001X999) ??? 4X1000
2000+2V999,999 ??? 4000
V999,999 ??? 1000
V999,999 < V1,000,000
I did same!!
Best and easy to understand
We know that 2 x + y ≤ 2 x 2 + y 2 (the QM-AM inequality). If we have x = 1 0 0 1 and y = 9 9 9 , we get that
2 1 0 0 1 + 9 9 9 ≤ 2 ( 1 0 0 1 ) 2 + ( 9 9 9 ) 2 = 2 1 0 0 1 + 9 9 9 = 1 0 0 0
Multiplying two on both sides we have
1 0 0 1 + 9 9 9 ≤ 2 1 0 0 0
Since both sides are not equal since the QM-AM inequality becomes an equality only when x = y , we can conclude
1 0 0 1 + 9 9 9 < 2 1 0 0 0
x + 1 − x is a decreasing function. So 1 0 0 1 − 1 0 0 0 < 1 0 0 0 − 9 9 9 ⟹ 1 0 0 1 + 9 9 9 < 2 1 0 0 0
that's how I did it as well, except I first assumed one of them to be greater than the other and I arrived at a contradiction which meant that the original inequality was incorrect.
√1001+√999=√(1000+1)+√(1000-1) by squaring the expression =1000+1+1000-1+2×√(1000+1)×√(1000-1)=2000+2×(√1000^2-1)=2000+2×√999999. {2×√1000}^2=4000=2000+2×√1000000 So {2×√1000}^2>{√1000+√999}^2. 2√1000>√1001+√999 two expressions are positive values .
I don't know if my logic is right, but:
( 1 0 0 1 + 9 9 9 ) 2 and ( 2 1 0 0 0 ) 2
equals
1 0 0 1 + 9 9 9 < 4 × 1 0 0 0
Left hand side is not correct
LHS=1001+2√1001√999+999=2000+2√2000=2(1000+√2000) and note that √2000=20√5 so you have 2(1000+20√5). Divide both sides by 2 and you get. 1000+20√5 ? 2000 . It's easy to see here which one is greater.
sqrt(2)=1.41 ; sqrt(3)=1.73 ; sqrt(4)=2
sqrt(2) + sqrt(4) = 3.41 < 3.46 = 2*sqrt(3)
If it worked for 2 and 4 it must work for 999 and 1001 :)
As 9 9 9 + 1 0 0 1 and 2 1 0 0 0 are positive numbers its relation won't change if we square them. 9 9 9 + 1 0 0 1 ¿ 2 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 + 2 1 0 0 0 8 9 ¿ 4 0 0 0 4 0 0 3 5 6 ¿ 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 3 5 6 ¿ 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 3 5 6 < 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 This means the initial sign was < , so 2 1 0 0 0 is greater
The rate of change of value of n , as n increases incrementally, decreases. This means that 1 0 0 0 is going to be slightly above the average of 9 9 9 and 1 0 0 1 , such that 2 1 0 0 0 is larger.
O (n) > O (n^0.5)
A change in the positive direction has less and less of an effect on a less than linear equation, so the sqrt(999) will be further from sqrt(1000) than sqrt(1001).
We can rewrite 1 0 0 1 + 9 9 9 as ( 1 0 0 0 + d 1 ) + ( 1 0 0 0 − d 2 ) , and
( 1 0 0 0 + d 1 ) + ( 1 0 0 0 − d 2 ) = 2 1 0 0 0 + ( d 1 − d 2 )
Now, since the difference between n and n + 1 becomes smaller as the value of n increases, we have that d 1 < d 2 ⟺ d 1 − d 2 < 0
and so 2 1 0 0 0 + ( d 1 − d 2 ) < 2 1 0 0 0 ⟹ 1 0 0 1 + 9 9 9 < 2 1 0 0 0
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
1 0 0 0 + 1 0 0 1 1 < 1 0 0 0 + 9 9 9 1
Rationalize the denominators to obtain
1 0 0 1 − 1 0 0 0 < 1 0 0 0 − 9 9 9
Rearranging both sides yields
1 0 0 1 + 9 9 9 < 2 1 0 0 0