3 2 0 + 1 4 2 + 3 2 0 − 1 4 2 = ?
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
Nice approach with 1.
For 2, what we should do is set 2 0 + 1 4 2 = ( a + b 2 ) 3 , get 2 degree 3 equations and solve (a degree 6 polynomial) to get the real root a = 2 , b = 1 .
time saving method
1) 14root(2) approx=19.6
2)cuberoot(39.6)+cuberoot(.4)
3)approx (3.something) +(.something) = only one option near this value=4
Get a look! We can see that (20+14sqrt(2)) = (2+sqrt(2))^3 (20- 14sqrt(2)) = (2-sqrt(2))^3 So the expression becomes: 2+sqrt(2)+2-sqrt(2) = 4 P.S : Sorry because I can't use LaTex
The options suggest that the values inside the roots are perfect cubes. Using the formulae of (a+b)^3 and (a-b)^3 we get a^3 + 3ab^2 =20 (1) b^3 + 3ba^2=14root2 (2) Take 'a' common in equation 1 and 'b' common in equation 2. It is clear that 'a' is rational and 'b' is a multiple of root 2. As 'a' is rational, it has to be a factor of 20. It is then easy to see that the value of 'a' is 2('b' comes out as root2). Hence the answer is (a+b)+(a-b) = 4
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
Method 1: Let x = 3 2 0 + 1 4 2 + 3 2 0 − 1 4 2 x − 3 2 0 + 1 4 2 − 3 2 0 − 1 4 2 = 0
Using the fact that a + b + c = 0 ⟹ a 3 + b 3 + c 3 = 3 a b c we get x 3 − ( 2 0 + 1 4 2 ) − ( 2 0 − 1 4 2 ) = 3 x ( 3 2 0 + 1 4 2 ) ( 3 2 0 − 1 4 2 ) ⟹ x 3 − 4 0 = 3 x 3 4 0 0 − 3 9 2 ⟹ x 3 − 4 0 = 6 x ⟹ x 3 − 6 x − 4 0 = 0
Since from the given options we know that it has one of the roots among 1 , 2 , 4 , 8 we check these and get that 4 is a rational root of the above cubic.
x 3 − 6 x − 4 0 = ( x − 4 ) ( x 2 + 4 x = 1 0
Since the roots of x 2 + 4 x + 1 0 are non real complex and x is the rum of two purely real numbers, only value it can take is 4 .
So x = 4 is the answer.
METHOD 2: BASED ON LUCK
Observe that the quantities under the cube roots are the cubes of 2 + 2 and 2 − 2 and we get directly our answer.
But this is my point of view when posing the question and is merely a lucky strike for the solver. So follow method 1