Calculus Problem by LOGA 7

Calculus Level 5

Let f f be a differentiable function on ( 0 , ) (0,~\infty) . Which of the following is/are true?

A. If lim x f ( x ) = 0 \displaystyle\lim_{x\to\infty}f'(x)=0 , then lim x f ( x ) \displaystyle\lim_{x\to\infty}f(x) exists.

B. If lim x f ( x ) = 0 \displaystyle\lim_{x\to\infty}f'(x)=0 , then lim x [ f ( x + 1 ) f ( x ) ] \displaystyle\lim_{x\to\infty}\left[f(x+1)-f(x)\right] exists.

C. If lim x f ( x ) \displaystyle\lim_{x\to\infty}f(x) exists, then lim x f ( x ) = 0 \displaystyle\lim_{x\to\infty}f'(x)=0 .

None A only B only C only A, B only A, C only B, C only A, B, C

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

3 solutions

Mark Hennings
Nov 21, 2020

(A) is false, with f ( x ) = x f(x) = \sqrt{x} giving a counterexample.

By the Mean Value Theorem, f ( x + 1 ) f ( x ) = f ( y x ) f(x+1) - f(x) = f'(y_x) for some x < y x < x + 1 x < y_x < x+1 . Thus lim x [ f ( x + 1 ) f ( x ) ] = lim y f ( y ) = 0 \lim_{x \to \infty}[f(x+1)-f(x)] \; = \; \lim_{y \to \infty}f'(y) = 0 . Thus (B) is true.

Consider the function f ( x ) = { 16 n 3 ( n + 1 2 n x ) 2 ( x n + 1 2 n ) 2 n 1 2 n < x < n + 1 2 n , n N 0 o.w. f(x) \; =\; \left\{ \begin{array}{lll} 16n^3\big(n + \tfrac{1}{2n} - x\big)^2\big(x - n + \tfrac{1}{2n}\big)^2 & \hspace{1cm} & n - \tfrac{1}{2n} < x < n + \tfrac{1}{2n}\;,\; n \in \mathbb{N} \\[2ex] 0 & & \textrm{o.w.} \end{array}\right.

This function is differentiable everywhere. In the interval ( n 1 2 n , n + 1 2 n ) \big(n - \tfrac{1}{2n},n+\tfrac{1}{2n}\big) , the function never exceeds n 1 n^{-1} . Thus it is clear that lim x f ( x ) = 0 \lim_{x \to \infty}f(x) = 0 . But the Mean Value Theorem tells us that there exists n < v n < n + 1 2 n n < v_n < n + \tfrac{1}{2n} such that f ( v n ) = 2 n [ f ( n + 1 2 n ) f ( n ) ] = 2 f'(v_n) \; = \; 2n\big[f\big(n + \tfrac{1}{2n}\big) - f(n)\big] = -2 for all n N n \in \mathbb{N} . Since v n v_n \to \infty as n n \to \infty , we cannot have lim x f ( x ) = 0 \lim_{x \to \infty}f'(x) = 0 . Thus (C) is false.

Logic Alpha
Nov 22, 2020

These are what I've found for counterexamples:

A. f ( x ) = ln x f(x)=\ln x

C. f ( x ) = e x sin ( e x ) f(x)=e^{-x}\sin(e^x)

Tom Engelsman
Nov 21, 2020

Quick and easy check is by utilizing f ( x ) = ln ( x ) . f(x) = \ln(x).

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...