Calvin's Driving Trip

Algebra Level 1

Calvin was making a trip to the University of Chicago. When he drove down, he took Lakeshore Drive, and averaged 35 miles per hour. On his way back, he took the I-94 highway, and averaged 50 miles per hour. Given that the return journey was 4 miles longer and took 6 minutes less, what is the length of the Lakeshore Drive route (in miles)?


The answer is 21.

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

11 solutions

Daniel Chiu
Nov 3, 2013

We write a system of equations, where d d is the length of Lakeshore Drive, and t t is the number of hours it took to drive down Lakeshore drive. d = 35 t d=35t d + 4 = 50 ( t 1 10 ) d+4=50(t-\dfrac{1}{10}) Then, d = 50 t 9 = 35 t d=50t-9=35t t = 3 5 t=\dfrac{3}{5} Finally, d = 35 t = 21 d=35t=\boxed{21} .

why you Raised 1 \ 10 of 50

Ibrahim Mahmoud - 7 years, 7 months ago

Log in to reply

I don't understand. Are you asking why I subtracted 1 10 \dfrac{1}{10} ? If so, it is because 6 minutes is 1 10 \dfrac{1}{10} of an hour.

Daniel Chiu - 7 years, 7 months ago
Shubham Kumar
Nov 3, 2013

Let distance covered through Lakeshore Drive be s(miles) , time taken be t(hrs) and given averaged speed is 35mph.

s = 35t ...............(i)

Therefore,

Distance covered through I-94 highway is s + 4 , time taken is t - 0.1 and given averaged speed is 50mph.

(s+4) = 50(t - 0.1)

t = (s+9)/50.

Now, putting value of t in eqn. (i), 35(s+9) = 50s

  7s + 63 = 10s

  3s = 63

    s = 21 (Ans.)

Note that this becomes, by equating time: l 35 = l + 4 50 + 6 60 \frac{l}{35}=\frac{l+4}{50}+\frac{6}{60} Solving for l l gives us: l = 21 mi. l=21\text{ mi.}

Saulo Carvalho
Nov 4, 2013

paragraph 1 x = 35t
paragraph 2 =>(6 min -> hour = 6/60 = 1/10 ) => 4+x = 50(t-1/10) t = 3/5 paragraph 3 x = 35*3/5 = 21

Abubakarr Yillah
Jan 10, 2014

Let the length of the Lakeshore Drive be d and let the time spent to cover that length be t.

In the instance d = 35 × t . . . . . ( 1 ) {d}={35}\times{t}.....(1)

In the second instance his d i s t a n c e = d + 4 distance={d+4}

and t i m e = t 0.1 time={t-0.1}

Note that the time given in minutes is converted to hours hence 0.1 hours

Thus d + 4 = 50 ( t 0.1 ) {d+4}=50(t-0.1)

which simplifies to 50 t d = 9..... ( 2 ) {50t-d}={9}.....(2)

from.....(1) d = 35 t {d}={35t} and substituting this into .....(2) we get

50 t 35 t = 9 {50t}-{35t}={9}

15 t = 9 {15t}={9}

t = 3 5 {t}=\frac{3}{5}

but d = 35 t {d}={35t}

i.e. d = 35 ( 3 5 ) {d}={35(\frac{3}{5})}

Hence the length of Lakeshore Drive is 21 m i l e s \boxed{21miles}

We know that s = v . t s=v.t where r r is length, v v is speed, and t t is time.

We just have to input the data.

from Lakeshore Drive we got s = 35 m i l . ( t m i n ) s=35mil.(tmin)

from I-94 highway we got s + 4 = 50 m i l . ( t m i n 6 m i n ) s+4=50mil.(tmin-6min)

from both equality we put it into one, s = 35 m i l . ( t m i n ) = 50 m i l . ( t m i n 6 m i n ) s=35mil.(tmin)=50mil.(tmin-6min)

we got t = 36 t=36

put t t to s = 35 m i l . ( t m i n ) s=35mil.(tmin) or s + 4 = 50 m i l . ( t m i n 6 m i n ) s+4=50mil.(tmin-6min) . And we found s = 21 s=21

Remember that s s here is length of Lakeshore Drive and I-94 highway length is s + 4 s +4 .

woops i left that the equality should be.

from Lakeshore Drive must be s = 35 m i l / 60 m i n . ( t m i n ) s=35mil/60min.(tmin)

from I-94 highway must be s = 50 m i l / 60 m i n . ( t m i n 6 m i n ) s=50mil/60min.(tmin-6min)

i was too focus put both equality to one. there the 60min we can say eliminated. so 3rd equality is right. sorry for that.

Hafizh Ahsan Permana - 7 years, 7 months ago

v 1 = s 1 t 1 v_1 = \frac{s_1}{t_1}

v 2 = s 2 t 2 = s 1 + Δ s t 1 Δ t v_2 = \frac{s_2}{t_2}=\frac{s_1+\Delta s}{t_1-\Delta t}

t 1 = s 1 v 1 v 2 = s 1 + Δ s s 1 v 1 Δ t t_1 = \frac{s_1}{v_1} \implies v_2 =\frac{s_1+\Delta s}{\frac{s_1}{v_1}-\Delta t}

v 2 s 1 v 1 Δ s v 2 = s 1 + Δ t v_2 \frac{s_1}{v_1} - \Delta s v_2 = s_1 + \Delta t

s 1 ( v 2 v 1 1 ) = Δ s v 2 + Δ t s_1 \left( \frac{v_2}{v_1} - 1 \right) = \Delta s v_2 + \Delta t

s 1 = Δ s v 2 + Δ t v 2 v 1 1 = 21 s_1 = \frac{\Delta s v_2+ \Delta t}{\frac{v_2}{v_1}-1} = \boxed{21}

Sameer Prasai
Nov 4, 2013

Let's analyze the 2 way journey simultaneously. In the time Calvin completed his return journey, he still had to drive 6 minutes to complete the Lakeshore drive, i.e. 35/10=3.5 miles. But as I-94 highway is 4 miles longer than Lakeshore, the distance between the relative positions of car in both tracks would be 3.5+4=7.5 miles. But the relative velocity of the cars is 50-35=15 miles per hour. If we consider the fact that both cars were at same relative position, i.e. start of each track before the respective journey, we see that the distance between the relative positions of cars increased from 0 to 7.5 when Calvin completed his return drive. As the relative velocity is 15 miles per hour, it took 30 mins for the distance between relative positions of cars to be 7.5 miles. Thus it took Calvin 30 mins to complete the return drive, so length of I-94 highway is 50/2=25 miles. Since Lakeshore is 4 miles shorter, its length is 25-4=21 miles.

Shreyas Shastry
Feb 27, 2014

distance = speed*time

35t+4 = 50(t-.1) t = .6 hrs

35(.6) = 21 miles

Aditya Joshi
Feb 14, 2014

Let the distance traveled by d d in time t t

Therefore, 35 = d t 35 = \dfrac{d}{t} or d = 35 t d = 35t

By the second condition,

50 = d + 4 ( t 6 60 ) 50 = \dfrac{d+4}{\left( t - \dfrac{6}{60}\right)}

Thus,

50 t 5 = d + 4 50t - 5 = d + 4 or 50 t 5 = 35 t + 4 50t - 5 = 35t + 4 and t = 9 15 t = \dfrac{9}{15}

But d = 35 t d = 35t and hence d = 35 × 9 15 = 21 d = 35 \times \dfrac{9}{15} = \boxed{21}

Siddharth Shah
Nov 16, 2013

let x be the distance and t1 be the time for going to Chicago. Therefore t1=x/35. similarly let t2 be the time of return. Therefore t2=x+4/50. Now according to the condition given, t1-t2=6/60 hrs. On solving for x after substituting the values of t1 and t2, we get the desired answer.

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...