n → ∞ lim G n A n
Let a 1 , a 2 , … , a n be an arithmetic progression composed solely of distinct positive reals.
Also, let A n denote its arithmetic mean and G n denote its geometric mean .
What is the value of the above limit to 3 decimal places?
If you think the limit doesn't exist, write -13.37 as your answer.
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
(just a note!!)
we are looking for ( a 1 a 2 . . . a n ) n 1 n a 1 + a 2 + . . . + a n
let this quest of ours result in y
Log in to reply
l o g y = l o g ( 2 a 1 + a n ) − ( 1 / n ) l o g a 1 a 2 . . . a n
by simply adding and subtracting l o g n ,we get
l o g y = l o g 2 n a 1 + a n − ( 1 / n ) l o g ( n a 1 + l o g n a 2 + . . . + l o g n a n )
first term of R.H.S. is l o g ( r / 2 ) where r is the common difference of the A.P.
second term is the integral of l o g r x with respect to x from 0 to 1
∫ l o g r x d x from 0 to 1 is l o g r − 1
l o g y = l o g 2 e
y is (e/2}
my method comes as a comment as i entered log y as the answer and finally gave up and realised my folly afterwards!!
Nice solution!
This is a good start. However, your explanation has a slight gap
Keep writing more solutions and you will get the hang of this!
Stirling's formula or Stolz Theorem is a nice approach .
I Did by Riemann's Sums.
On writing the limit take log both sides and use the standard riemann sums technique to evaluate
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
Relevant wiki: Stirling's Formula
Instead of the usual notation for arithmetic progressions, I will let the initial term be a + d for sake of elegance in following expressions.
It is trivial to show that, for an arithmetic progression with initial term a + d and common difference d , A n = 2 2 a + ( n + 1 ) d
The product of all the terms can have d factored out of each individual term to obtain:
d n ( d a + 1 ) ( d a + 2 ) ⋯ ( d a + n )
By an abuse of notation, I will use the factorial in place of the gamma function for arbitrary real argument for simplicity.
( G n ) n = d n ( d a ) ! ( n + d a + 1 ) ! ≈ d n 2 π d a 2 π ( n + d a + 1 ) × ( d e a ) d a ( e n + d e a + e 1 ) ( n + d a + 1 )
After taking the n th root of both sides, as n → ∞ , all of the terms tend to unity except the ones which have exponent part that is independent of n . So the limiting behaviour of G n is d × e d a + n + 1 = e a + ( n + 1 ) d
Taking the quotient of the expressions yields 2 e × ( 1 + a + ( n + 1 ) d a )
Which obviously tends to 2 e as n → ∞