I have 2 numbers, one of them is larger than the other.
If I place these numbers on a number line, then the distance between them is 3.
But if I multiply these numbers by itself to form 2 other numbers, and place these 2 other numbers on another number line, will the distance between them always be larger than 3?
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
Great work! All we have to do is to find a counterexample to disprove this (universal) claim.
Can you find all possible solutions of these two numbers that satisfy all these properties, namely
∣ x − y ∣ = 3 and ∣ x 2 − y 2 ∣ > 3 ?
Log in to reply
There will be 4 pairs of ( x , y ) that are ( 2 , − 1 ) , ( − 1 , 2 ) , ( 1 , − 2 ) and ( − 2 , 1 )
Log in to reply
No, I'm not just looking for integer solutions only. Yes, you have written up all the pairs of integer solutions, but are there any other non-integer solutions as well?
Let the numbers be n and n + 3
all the numbers where n ∈ [ − 2 , − 1 ] will serve as counter examples
x 2 − y 2 = ( x − y ) ( x + y )
So as x − y = 3 , for ∣ x 2 − y 2 ∣ ≤ 3 we need ∣ x + y ∣ ≤ 1
So all ordered solutions ( x , y ) where x > y can be expressed as ( n , n − 3 ) for all n ∈ [ 1 , 2 ]
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
Let the 2 numbers be − 2 and 1 having a distance of 3 units.
Then, the new numbers formed will be 4 and 1 which have a distance of 3 units again.
Therefore, For two numbers having a distance of 3 units, it is not necessary that their squares will also have distance more than 3 units.