This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
Great work. Fun fact: because the expression shows the square root of difference of two perfect square and the answer is already an integer. Then, rearranging shows that 4 5 2 + 1 0 8 2 = 1 1 7 2 . Looks familiar? This is a Pythagoras Triplet: if a triangle has sides of 4 5 , 1 0 8 , 1 1 7 , then it must be a right triangle. Bonus question: Is this the only Pythagoras Triplet with 1 1 7 as its hypotenuse?
You made a slight typo, in the third line down: 1 5 2 × 3 2 . . . . . n o t . . . 1 5 2 × 9 2
Quick check using sum of digits shows that both 1 1 7 and 1 0 8 are divisible by 9 . That gives us
1 1 7 2 − 1 0 8 2 = 9 1 3 2 − 1 2 2
We know that the triple 5 − 1 2 − 1 3 forms a right triangle; so, by Pythagoras's theorem, we get that
9 1 3 2 − 1 2 2 = 9 5 2 = 9 × 5 = 4 5
Ingenious, great work! Bonus question: Is it possible to use your approach to evaluate 2 3 3 2 − 1 0 5 2 ?
Nope. You are overestimating the power of a brain or underestimating relativity
2 2 5 × 9 using identity of a 2 − b 2
1 5 × 3 = 4 5
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
1 1 7 2 − 1 0 8 2 = ( 1 1 7 + 1 0 8 ) ( 1 1 7 − 1 0 8 ) = ( 2 2 5 ) ( 9 ) = 1 5 2 × 3 2 = 1 5 × 3 = 4 5