Warm up problem: Cartesian Right Triangle 2 (harder)

Geometry Level 4

here is a link to the easier one

Given point A=(1,6) and B=(4,12) and line D=3x+7, a point C is placed on line D such that A B C \triangle ABC is a right triangle. If the sum of all possible x-coordinates of c can be represented by p q \dfrac{p}{q} . Find p+q.

Tip: the right angle doesn't necessarily occur at A or B.


The answer is 319.

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

1 solution

Using vectors and scalar dot products is probably the easiest way to approach this problem.

We will have 4 4 possible scenarios for point C ( x , 3 x + 7 ) C(x, 3x + 7) , (noting that by, for example, < A C > <AC> I mean the vector from A A to C C and by " \cdot " I mean the dot product operation):

(i), (ii): < A C > < B C > = 0 <AC>\cdot<BC> = 0

< x 1 , 3 x + 1 > < x 4 , 3 x 5 > = 0 \Longrightarrow <x - 1, 3x + 1>\cdot<x - 4, 3x - 5> = 0

( x 1 ) ( x 4 ) + ( 3 x + 1 ) ( 3 x 5 ) = 0 \Longrightarrow (x - 1)(x - 4) + (3x + 1)(3x - 5) = 0

10 x 2 17 x 1 = 0 \Longrightarrow 10x^{2} - 17x - 1 = 0 ,

the two roots of which add to 17 10 \frac{17}{10} .

(iii) < A C > < A B > = 0 <AC> \cdot <AB> = 0

< x 1 , 3 x + 1 > < 3 , 6 > = 0 \Longrightarrow <x - 1, 3x + 1> \cdot <3,6> = 0

3 x 3 + 18 x + 6 = 0 21 x = 3 x = 1 7 \Longrightarrow 3x - 3 + 18x + 6 = 0 \Longrightarrow 21x = -3 \Longrightarrow x = -\frac{1}{7} .

(iv) < B C > < A B > = 0 <BC> \cdot <AB> = 0

< x 4 , 3 x 5 > < 3 , 6 > = 0 \Longrightarrow <x - 4, 3x - 5> \cdot <3,6> = 0

3 x 12 + 18 x 30 = 0 x = 2 \Longrightarrow 3x - 12 + 18x - 30 = 0 \Longrightarrow x = 2 .

So the sum of all possible x x -coordinates will be

17 10 1 7 + 2 = 249 70 \frac{17}{10} - \frac{1}{7} + 2 = \frac{249}{70} .

Thus p = 249 , q = 70 p = 249, q = 70 and p + q = 319 p + q = \boxed{319} .

You're too smart... I just used simple analytical geom. But great solution nonetheless.

Trevor Arashiro - 6 years, 8 months ago

Log in to reply

Thanks. Yes, there are a few ways to approach this problem, but since I hadn't used vectors for a while I just went with this method. Good question; thanks for posting it. :)

Brian Charlesworth - 6 years, 8 months ago

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...