Let f ( n ) = ⌊ n + n ⌋ where n is a natural number.
Let k 1 , k 2 , k 3 , k 4 , k 5 , k 6 be six natural numbers such that f k 1 ( 3 6 ) , f k 2 ( 4 0 ) , f k 3 ( 4 3 ) , f k 4 ( 4 8 ) , f k 5 ( 2 0 7 2 ) , f k 6 ( 2 1 1 5 ) are all perfect squares .
Then find the minimum value of k 1 + k 2 + k 3 + k 4 + k 5 + k 6 − 8 9 .
Note: f 2 ( n ) = f ( f ( n ) ) .
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
first of all let m 2 ≤ ( n ) < ( m + 1 ) 2 .
we get f ( n ) = n + m .
Then we try to find the value of k s of which f k ( n ) = z 2 where z is an integer.
(here the interval of n is [ m 2 , ( m + 1 ) 2 ) .
We find the below pattern .
hence we get k 1 = 1 3 , k 2 = 8 , k 3 = 1 , k 4 = 1 1 , k 5 = 3 , k 6 = 8 9 .
Proof of the pattern obtained
n = m 2 + p ; ( 1 ≤ p ≤ m )
f ( n ) = f ( m 2 + p ) = m 2 + p + m
f 2 ( m 2 + p ) = m 2 + p + 2 m = ( m + 1 ) 2 + ( p − 1 )
f 2 ( ( m + 1 ) 2 + ( p − 1 ) ) = ( m + 2 ) 2 + ( p − 2 )
f 2 ( ( m + 2 ) 2 + ( p − 2 ) ) = ( m + 3 ) 2 + ( p − 3 )
f 2 p ( ( m ) 2 + p ) = ( m + p ) 2 + ( p − p ) = ( m + p ) 2
Simlarly we can prove for m + 1 ≤ p ≤ 2 m
Shivam, isn't f 8 ( 4 0 ) = 1 0 0 and f 1 1 ( 4 8 ) = 1 4 4 ?
In the second line of the problem statement, you have "... be four natural numbers such that ". I think it should say: " six natural numbers". The way it is now, I thought maybe some values of k i had a repeat, causing the SET of natural numbers you were looking for to be only 4 elements. Well, after composing f with itself up to 10,000 times on each value of n , here is my summary:
n=36, k 1 -->13,38,87,184,377,762,1531,3068, or 6141
n=40, k 2 -->8,29,70,151,312,633,1274,2555, or 5116
n=43, k 3 -->1,16,45,102,215,440,889,1786,3579, or 7164
n=48, k 4 -->11,36,85,182,375,760,1529,3066, or 6139
n=2072, k 5 -->3,98,287,664,1417,2922, or 5931
n=2115, k 6 -->89,270,631,1352,2793, or 5674
At this point, I gave up searching for repeats, and just assumed you meant "six natural numbers"
Update: I changed it to say "six" on July 3, 2017 at 9:25 am MDT.
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
I am suprised that I could able to solve this question!
First, when I'm finding the pattern of f k ( 3 6 ) , I get this
f 0 ( 3 6 ) = 3 6
f ( 3 6 ) = 4 2 = 3 6 + 6 = 6 2 + 6
f 2 ( 3 6 ) = 4 8 = 4 2 + 6
f 3 ( 3 6 ) = 5 4 = 4 8 + 6 = 7 2 + 5
f 4 ( 3 6 ) = 6 1 = 5 4 + 7
f 5 ( 3 6 ) = 6 8 = 6 1 + 7 = 8 2 + 4
f 6 ( 3 6 ) = 7 6 = 6 8 + 8
f 7 ( 3 6 ) = 8 4 = 7 6 + 8 = 9 2 + 3
f 8 ( 3 6 ) = 9 3 = 8 4 + 9
f 9 ( 3 6 ) = 1 0 2 = 9 3 + 9 = 1 0 2 + 2
f 1 0 ( 3 6 ) = 1 1 2 = 1 0 2 + 1 0
f 1 1 ( 3 6 ) = 1 2 2 = 1 1 2 + 1 0 = 1 1 2 + 1
f 1 2 ( 3 6 ) = 1 3 3 = 1 2 2 + 1 1
f 1 3 ( 3 6 ) = 1 4 4 = 1 2 2
k 1 = 1 3
I thought about what makes this consequence, every two row leads to something\s square and add a uniformly decreasing integer.
So I recall that the difference between m 2 and ( m + 1 ) 2 be 2 m + 1 .
Then, I compare f 1 with f 3 and f 3 with f 5 , found that f 3 − f 1 = ( 7 2 + 5 ) − ( 6 2 + 6 ) = ( 7 2 − 6 2 ) − 1 = ( 2 m + 1 ) − 1 = 2 × 6
f 5 − f 3 = ( 8 2 + 4 ) − ( 7 2 + 5 ) = ( 8 2 − 7 2 ) − 1 = ( 2 m + 1 ) − 1 = 2 × 7
f 7 − f 5 = ( 9 2 + 3 ) − ( 8 2 + 4 ) = ( 9 2 − 8 2 ) − 1 = ( 2 m + 1 ) − 1 = 2 × 8
and so on.
So, I found a list to find for which k satisfied f k ( n ) for any known n
1: Turns n into n = m 2 + r which m 2 is smaller than n and the nearest perfect square to n . Notice that if there exists a n ′ makes n ′ = m 2 + r ′ with r ′ < r ,then n shouldn't be considered, just as those numbers which didn't be boxed.
2: because of every two times of functioning f , r gets 1 smaller, so first calculate how many time functioning to get n , called k 0 , solution of k will be k = k 0 + 2 r .
As the first question, k 0 = 1 leads to n = 4 2 , r = 6 , so leads to k 1 = 1 + 2 × 6 = 1 3 . Ya, it works!
Continue to solve k 2 , we get k 0 = 0 , r = 4 , so k 2 = 8 .
For k 3 , k 0 = 1 , r = 0 , so k 3 = 1 .
For k 4 , k 0 = 1 , r = 5 , so k 4 = 1 1 .
For k 5 , since 2 0 7 2 is quite large , 2 0 7 2 = 4 5 . 5 1 9 2 . . . , f ( 2 0 7 2 ) = 2 1 1 7 = 2 1 1 6 + 1 = 4 6 2 + 1 , so 2 1 1 7 is that n , so k 0 = 1 , r = 1 , then k 5 = 3 .
For k 6 , from above status we know 2 1 1 5 is exactly 1 lesser than 4 6 2 , so try to functioning once, we get f ( 2 1 1 5 ) = 2 1 1 5 + 4 5 = 2 1 6 0 = 4 6 2 + 4 4 , we get k 0 = 1 and r = 4 4 , if we really expand steps of functioning this number we will get 89 row, it is a messy! So let us straightforward using the formula we get k 6 = 1 + 2 × 4 4 = 8 9 .
k 1 + k 2 + k 3 + k 4 + k 5 + k 6 − 8 9 = 3 6