Let f ( x ) be a second degree polynomial such that
⎩ ⎨ ⎧ f ( 0 ) + f ′ ( 0 ) + f ′ ′ ( 0 ) f ( 1 ) + f ′ ( 1 ) + f ′ ′ ( 1 ) f ( 2 ) + f ′ ( 2 ) + f ′ ′ ( 2 ) = 1 2 = 1 3 = 2 3
Evaluate f ( 3 ) + f ′ ( 3 ) + f ′ ′ ( 3 ) .
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
How did you get the expression with g ( x ) , after which you substituted 0 ?
Log in to reply
You can get this equation from linear recurrences or finite differences .
More generally, if p ( x ) is a polynomial of degree n , then p ( x + n + 1 ) − ( 1 n + 1 ) p ( x + n ) + ( 2 n + 1 ) p ( x + n − 1 ) − ⋯ + ( − 1 ) n + 1 p ( x ) = 0 for all x . If you're not familiar with this result, then it's a good exercise.
Very superior method!! something new for me .thanks . I used algebraic method. 😀😀
For f ( x ) = a x 2 + b x + c ,
( α ) f ( 0 ) + f ′ ( 0 ) + f ′ ′ ( 0 ) ( β ) f ( 1 ) + f ′ ( 1 ) + f ′ ′ ( 1 ) ( γ ) f ( 2 ) + f ′ ( 2 ) + f ′ ′ ( 2 ) = 2 a + b + c = 5 a + 2 b + c = 1 0 a + 3 b + c = 1 2 = 1 3 = 2 3
Doing 2 α + γ − 2 β , we find out a = 2 9 . Doing β − α , we have b = − 2 2 5 , and finally c = 2 3 1 .
Because f ( 3 ) + f ′ ( 3 ) + f ′ ′ ( 3 ) = 1 7 a + 4 b + c , we have that our desired value is 4 2 .
Same method! !
You did what I did. No nonsense just straight up linear system.
i have just found my own method but the result is just the same... :) from the equation above, 2a+b+c = 12 >> (A) 5a+2b+c = 13 >> (B) 10a+3b+c = 23 >> (C)
then we substract between B and A simply, as follows: 5a+2b+c = 13 2a+b+c = 12 after subtraction, we got 3a +b = 1 (i) and we subtract again between C and B, then we got, 5a+b = 10 (ii)
we subtract again between (i) and (ii), we got 2a = 9.
then separate 17a+4b+c into 2a + (5a + b) + (10a + 3b + c). then, we simply have 9 + 10 + 23 = 42. :)
i'm not sure how i got this but for each x in f(x) the resulting summation of the function, first and second derivatives is part of a sequence. From x=0 to x=1 we get a difference of 1 (13-12) and from x=1 to x=2 you get a difference of 10 (23-13). So the difference between these two differences (10-1) is 9 so the next summation for x=3 should be 10+9= 19 more than the sum of 23 for x=2. So i added 23 and 19 and got 42 in my head. Can anyone help me understand if there is a logical explanation to this extrapolation? Is it because some property of a parabola? Let me know what you did
Nice job, @Elena Lopez ! You are right. The thing is that g ( x ) = f ( x ) + f ′ ( x ) + f ′ ′ ( x ) is quadratic if f ( x ) is quadratic. Let us assume that g ( x ) = a x 2 + b x + c . It is not difficult to see that the sequence ( g ( n + 1 ) − g ( n ) ) n is arithmetic. Indeed, g ( n + 1 ) − g ( n ) = a ( n + 1 ) 2 + b ( n + 1 ) + c − ( a n 2 + b n + c ) = 2 a n + a + b and the common difference is 2 a . As you realized, g ( 1 ) − g ( 0 ) = 1 and g ( 2 ) − g ( 1 ) = 1 0 . So the common difference of the sequence g ( n + 1 ) − g ( n ) is 1 0 − 1 = 9 . Therefore, g ( 3 ) − g ( 2 ) = g ( 2 ) − g ( 1 ) + 9 = 1 9 . Now, solving for g ( 3 ) , and using the fact that g ( 2 ) = 2 3 , we get that g ( 3 ) = 4 2 , which is the answer of the problem.
We let g ( x ) = f ( x ) + f ′ ( x ) + f ′ ′ ( x ) . Since deg ( f ( x ) ) = 2 , we must have deg ( f ′ ( x ) ) = 1 and deg ( f ′ ′ ( x ) ) = 0 and thus deg ( g ( x ) ) = max ( deg ( f ( x ) ) , deg ( f ′ ( x ) ) , deg ( f ′ ′ ( x ) ) ) = 2 . Thus, ∃ a , b , c ∈ R such that g ( x ) = a x 2 + b x + c . Hence we have 3 variables and 3 equations. Solving, we have a = 2 9 , b = − 2 7 and c = 1 2 . Thus g ( 3 ) = 2 9 × 3 2 − 2 7 × 3 + 1 2 = 4 2 .
way to overcomplicate things...
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
Let g ( x ) = f ( x ) + f ′ ( x ) + f ′ ′ ( x ) . Since f ( x ) is a quadratic, so is g ( x ) . We can then apply the fact that for any quadratic polynomial g ( x ) , g ( x + 3 ) − 3 g ( x + 2 ) + 3 g ( x + 1 ) − g ( x ) = 0 for all x .
Setting x = 0 , we find g ( 3 ) = 3 g ( 2 ) − 3 g ( 1 ) + g ( 0 ) = 3 ⋅ 2 3 − 3 ⋅ 1 3 + 1 2 = 4 2 .