Caught Similarities

Calculus Level 3

Let f ( x ) f(x) be a second degree polynomial such that

{ f ( 0 ) + f ( 0 ) + f ( 0 ) = 12 f ( 1 ) + f ( 1 ) + f ( 1 ) = 13 f ( 2 ) + f ( 2 ) + f ( 2 ) = 23 \left\{\begin{matrix} f(0)+f'(0)+f''(0) \! \! \! \! \! &=12\\ f(1)+f'(1)+f''(1) \! \! \! \! \! &=13\\ f(2)+f'(2)+f''(2) \! \! \! \! \! &=23 \end{matrix}\right.

Evaluate f ( 3 ) + f ( 3 ) + f ( 3 ) f(3) + f'(3) + f''(3) .


The answer is 42.

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

4 solutions

Jon Haussmann
May 11, 2014

Let g ( x ) = f ( x ) + f ( x ) + f ( x ) g(x) = f(x) + f'(x) + f''(x) . Since f ( x ) f(x) is a quadratic, so is g ( x ) g(x) . We can then apply the fact that for any quadratic polynomial g ( x ) g(x) , g ( x + 3 ) 3 g ( x + 2 ) + 3 g ( x + 1 ) g ( x ) = 0 g(x + 3) - 3g(x + 2) + 3g(x + 1) - g(x) = 0 for all x x .

Setting x = 0 x = 0 , we find g ( 3 ) = 3 g ( 2 ) 3 g ( 1 ) + g ( 0 ) = 3 23 3 13 + 12 = 42. g(3) = 3g(2) - 3g(1) + g(0) = 3 \cdot 23 - 3 \cdot 13 + 12 = 42.

How did you get the expression with g ( x ) g(x) , after which you substituted 0 0 ?

Nanayaranaraknas Vahdam - 7 years, 1 month ago

Log in to reply

You can get this equation from linear recurrences or finite differences .

More generally, if p ( x ) p(x) is a polynomial of degree n n , then p ( x + n + 1 ) ( n + 1 1 ) p ( x + n ) + ( n + 1 2 ) p ( x + n 1 ) + ( 1 ) n + 1 p ( x ) = 0 p(x + n + 1) - \binom{n + 1}{1} p(x + n) + \binom{n + 1}{2} p(x + n - 1) - \dots + (-1)^{n + 1} p(x) = 0 for all x x . If you're not familiar with this result, then it's a good exercise.

Jon Haussmann - 7 years, 1 month ago

Log in to reply

Thank You!

Nanayaranaraknas Vahdam - 7 years, 1 month ago

Very superior method!! something new for me .thanks . I used algebraic method. 😀😀

Anurag Pandey - 4 years, 10 months ago

For f ( x ) = a x 2 + b x + c f(x)=ax^2+bx+c ,

( α ) f ( 0 ) + f ( 0 ) + f ( 0 ) = 2 a + b + c = 12 ( β ) f ( 1 ) + f ( 1 ) + f ( 1 ) = 5 a + 2 b + c = 13 ( γ ) f ( 2 ) + f ( 2 ) + f ( 2 ) = 10 a + 3 b + c = 23 \begin{matrix} (\alpha) \; \; f(0)+f'(0)+f''(0) \! \! \! \! \! &=2a+b+c \! \! \! \! \! &= 12\\ (\beta) \; \; f(1)+f'(1)+f''(1) \! \! \! \! \! &=5a+2b+c \! \! \! \! \! &= 13\\ (\gamma) \; \; f(2)+f'(2)+f''(2) \! \! \! \! \! &=10a+3b+c \! \! \! \! \! &= 23 \end{matrix}

Doing α + γ 2 β 2 \dfrac{\alpha + \gamma - 2 \beta}{2} , we find out a = 9 2 a=\dfrac{9}{2} . Doing β α \beta - \alpha , we have b = 25 2 b = -\dfrac{25}{2} , and finally c = 31 2 c=\dfrac{31}{2} .

Because f ( 3 ) + f ( 3 ) + f ( 3 ) = 17 a + 4 b + c f(3)+f'(3)+f''(3) =17a+4b+c , we have that our desired value is 42. \boxed{42.}

Same method! !

Manu Attri - 7 years, 1 month ago

You did what I did. No nonsense just straight up linear system.

A Former Brilliant Member - 7 years, 1 month ago

i have just found my own method but the result is just the same... :) from the equation above, 2a+b+c = 12 >> (A) 5a+2b+c = 13 >> (B) 10a+3b+c = 23 >> (C)

then we substract between B and A simply, as follows: 5a+2b+c = 13 2a+b+c = 12 after subtraction, we got 3a +b = 1 (i) and we subtract again between C and B, then we got, 5a+b = 10 (ii)

we subtract again between (i) and (ii), we got 2a = 9.

then separate 17a+4b+c into 2a + (5a + b) + (10a + 3b + c). then, we simply have 9 + 10 + 23 = 42. :)

L'ultimo Guerriero - 6 years, 12 months ago
Elena Lopez
Jul 16, 2015

i'm not sure how i got this but for each x in f(x) the resulting summation of the function, first and second derivatives is part of a sequence. From x=0 to x=1 we get a difference of 1 (13-12) and from x=1 to x=2 you get a difference of 10 (23-13). So the difference between these two differences (10-1) is 9 so the next summation for x=3 should be 10+9= 19 more than the sum of 23 for x=2. So i added 23 and 19 and got 42 in my head. Can anyone help me understand if there is a logical explanation to this extrapolation? Is it because some property of a parabola? Let me know what you did

Nice job, @Elena Lopez ! You are right. The thing is that g ( x ) = f ( x ) + f ( x ) + f ( x ) g(x)=f(x)+f'(x)+f''(x) is quadratic if f ( x ) f(x) is quadratic. Let us assume that g ( x ) = a x 2 + b x + c g(x)=ax^2+bx+c . It is not difficult to see that the sequence ( g ( n + 1 ) g ( n ) ) n (g(n+1)-g(n))_{n} is arithmetic. Indeed, g ( n + 1 ) g ( n ) = a ( n + 1 ) 2 + b ( n + 1 ) + c ( a n 2 + b n + c ) = 2 a n + a + b g(n+1)-g(n)=a(n+1)^2+b(n+1)+c-(an^2+b n+c)=2a n+a+b and the common difference is 2 a 2a . As you realized, g ( 1 ) g ( 0 ) = 1 g(1)-g(0)=1 and g ( 2 ) g ( 1 ) = 10 g(2)-g(1)=10 . So the common difference of the sequence g ( n + 1 ) g ( n ) {g(n+1)-g(n)} is 10 1 = 9 10-1=9 . Therefore, g ( 3 ) g ( 2 ) = g ( 2 ) g ( 1 ) + 9 = 19. g(3)-g(2)=g(2)-g(1)+9=19. Now, solving for g ( 3 ) , g(3), and using the fact that g ( 2 ) = 23 , g(2)=23, we get that g ( 3 ) = 42 , g(3)=42, which is the answer of the problem.

Arturo Presa - 5 years, 8 months ago
Indrayudh Roy
May 20, 2014

We let g ( x ) = f ( x ) + f ( x ) + f ( x ) g(x)=f(x)+f'(x)+f''(x) . Since deg ( f ( x ) ) = 2 (f(x))=2 , we must have deg ( f ( x ) ) = 1 (f'(x))=1 and deg ( f ( x ) ) = 0 (f''(x))=0 and thus deg ( g ( x ) ) = (g(x))= max ( ( deg ( f ( x ) ) (f(x)) , deg ( f ( x ) ) (f'(x)) , deg ( f ( x ) ) ) = 2 (f''(x)))=2 . Thus, a , b , c R \exists a,b,c \in \Bbb R such that g ( x ) = a x 2 + b x + c g(x)=ax^{2}+bx+c . Hence we have 3 3 variables and 3 3 equations. Solving, we have a = 9 2 , b = 7 2 a=\frac{9}{2},b=-\frac{7}{2} and c = 12 c=12 . Thus g ( 3 ) = 9 2 × 3 2 7 2 × 3 + 12 = 42. g(3)=\frac{9}{2}\times 3^{2}-\frac{7}{2}\times 3 + 12=42.

way to overcomplicate things...

John M. - 6 years, 11 months ago

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...