Evaluate
k = 1 ∑ 4 5 csc 2 ( 2 k − 1 )
The angle is given in degrees.
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
Your solution is insufficient and barely contain any relevant working. You should also clarify that the angles are in degrees. Note that we assume angles are in radian unless stated as otherwise (like inserting the degree symbol: ∘ ).
Let a be a positive integer. There is a fairly well-known identity, which we will prove below: k = 1 ∑ a − 1 csc 2 a k π = 3 a 2 − 1 . ( 1 ) In words, this identity gives the sum the square cosecants of all the integer multiples of π / a in the first two quadrants. We are interested in the sum of the square cosecants of the odd integer multiples of 1 ∘ = π / 1 8 0 in the first quadrant, so we can find the sum of all the integer multiples in the first two quadrants, subtract the sum of the even integer multiples, and divide by 2: k = 1 ∑ 4 5 csc 2 ( 1 8 0 ( 2 k − 1 ) π ) = 2 1 ( k = 1 ∑ 1 7 9 csc 2 1 8 0 k π − k = 1 ∑ 8 9 csc 2 1 8 0 2 k π ) = 2 1 ( 3 1 8 0 2 − 1 − 3 9 0 2 − 1 ) = 4 0 5 0 .
Now let us prove (1). For brevity, put ω k = sin 2 ( k π / a ) . Let P a denote the polynomial defined by P a ( x ) = k = 1 ∏ a − 1 ( x − ω k ) , and let r a and s a denote the constant and linear coefficient of P a . By Vieta, k = 1 ∑ a − 1 csc 2 a k π = k = 1 ∑ a − 1 ω k 1 = ∏ k ω k ∑ k ∏ j = k ω j = − r a s a . We will show a recursive process that generates P a , and then we will use that process to show inductively that r a = a 2 and s a = − 3 ( a 2 − 1 ) a 2 , ( 2 ) from which (1) follows.
Let S a denote the a th spread polynomial, which is defined by S a ( x ) = 2 1 [ 1 − T a ( 1 − 2 x ) ] , where T a is the a th Chebyshev polynomial. One property of S a is that S a ( sin 2 θ ) = sin 2 a θ . Another is that S a can be generated recursively by starting with S 1 = x and S 2 = 4 x − 4 x 3 and applying the rule S a + 1 ( x ) = 2 ( 1 − 2 x ) S a ( x ) − S a − 1 ( x ) + 2 x . ( 3 ) Notice that S a ( x ) = 0 for x = 0 , ω 1 , ω 2 , … , ω a − 1 . This means that 0 , ω 1 , ω 2 , … , ω a − 1 are exactly the roots of S a , or equivalently, ω 1 , ω 2 , … , ω a − 1 are exactly the roots of S a ( x ) / x . Thus we have shown P a ( x ) = x S a ( x ) .
Now we will show by induction that (2) holds for all a ≥ 1 . When we generate P a for a = 1 and a = 2 , we see P 1 ( x ) = 1 + 0 x and P 2 ( x ) = 4 − 4 x , and we can verify directly that (2) holds. Fix b ≥ 2 and find P b and P b − 1 . Extract the coefficients r b , s b , r b − 1 , and s b − 1 and suppose that (2) holds when a = b and a = b − 1 . By (3), P b + 1 ( x ) = x S b + 1 ( x ) = 2 ( 1 − 2 x ) x S b ( x ) − x S b − 1 ( x ) + 2 = 2 ( 1 − 2 x ) P b ( x ) − P b − 1 ( x ) + 2 . From this equation, we find the constant and linear coefficient of P b + 1 are r b + 1 = 2 r b − r b − 1 + 2 and s b + 1 = − s b − 1 − 2 ( 2 r b − s b ) . Applying (2) and simplifying, we obtain r b + 1 = ( b + 1 ) 2 and s b + 1 = − 3 [ ( b + 1 ) 2 − 1 ] ( b + 1 ) 2 . Thus we have shown that (2) holds when a = b + 1 . By induction, (2) holds for all a , and this is the result that confirms the identity in (1).
Note: I found this proof of (1) (along with several others) at StackExchage .
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
I'll post a full solution tomorrow, too tired rn.
For now, note that 1 ∑ 4 5 csc 2 ( 2 k − 1 ) = 1 ∑ 4 5 sec 2 ( 2 k − 1 )
And that when you reverse the coefficients of f ( x ) that the roots become inverted (eg: if the roots of f ( x ) are a , b , c then when the coefficients are reversed, the new polynomial has roots a 1 , b 1 , c 1 )
Also, we are once again working with T 9 0 ( x )