y = x 2 + 4 x + 3 c x 2 + 2 x + c
If the set of real values of c for which y can take all real values for x ∈ R is in the form ( a , b ) , then find a + b .
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
It's possible that I'm reading the question incorrectly, but... If c = 0 , then y would not be able to take x = − 4 since that would result in dividing by 0 . If c = 1 , then y would not be able to take x = − 3 since that would result in dividing by 0 . Doesn't that make 0 and 1 not possible values for c ?
Log in to reply
Correct... Next time you spot an error in any question, do bother to file a report in reports section so that it notifies the problem poser.
You would also have to check what happens when the denominator is 0, because we are not allowed to multiply by 0.
@Rishabh Cool hello , why did you check only for the boundary values c =0 and c=1 , it may be possible that the numerator and denominator get a common factor for c belonging strictly between 0 and 1 (0 and 1 excluded) , in that case also we would have to exclude that particular value of c .Or else how do you prove that there is no value of c between 0 and 1 which brings about a common factor in the numerator and denominator .
Log in to reply
That's what the whole method is for.. !! We only need to check for equality cases at the closing and opening of intervals whether the equality holds true or not and that's what I did.
I don't think 0 and 1 should be included in the range for c. In addition to the problem of denominator 0 as Calvin and Louis mentioned, even if we cancel out the 0 denominator, for c = 0 we get y = (x+2)/(x+4), which we can not get the value of y = 1(can approach it as the horizontal asymptote). Similarly, for c = 1 we get y = (x+1)/(x+3), again we can never get the value of y = 1.
In short, the correct way to phrase the problem should be c in the form of (a, b), not [a,b].
Log in to reply
Ya... You are correct. But note when c = 0 , y cannot take 2 1 as well along with 1 since we aren't supposed to take x = 0 since it'd result in 0 / 0 form. Same way when c = 1 , y cannot take 0 as well along with not taking 1 by a similar reason. In future if you spot any error do report the question in report section. Thanks.
@Rishabh Cool most probably you are right , but I am unable to understand this ; will you please elaborate it more .
Log in to reply
Can you point out specifically where in the solution ?
Yo! akshat similar problem of kj sir
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
Rearranging (forming a quadratic in x ), we get:
( y − 1 ) x 2 + 2 ( 2 y − 1 ) x + 3 c y − c = 0
Since x ∈ R , discriminant of this quadratic must be non negative i.e:
4 ( 2 y − 1 ) 2 − 4 ( 3 c y − c ) ( y − 1 ) ≥ 0
⟺ ( 4 − 3 c ) y 2 + 4 ( c − 1 ) y − ( c − 1 ) ≥ 0
Now for this to hold for all y ∈ R , we need to insure leading coefficient is positive (i.e c < 3 4 ) and discriminant is non positive i.e:
4 ( c − 1 ) 2 + ( c − 1 ) ( 4 − 3 c ) ≤ 0
⟺ ( c − 1 ) ( 4 c − 4 + 4 − 3 c ) ≤ 0
⟺ ( c − 1 ) ( c ) ≤ 0
⟺ c ∈ [ 0 , 1 ]
( I ) c = 0
y = x ( x + 4 ) x ( x + 2 ) = 1 − x + 4 2 , x = 0
Its apparent that y can take all real values except 1 ( ∵ x + 4 2 = 0 ) and also 2 1 since x = 0 , so that range is not R . Hence c = 0
( I I ) c = 1
y = ( x + 1 ) ( x + 3 ) ( x + 1 ) 2 = 1 − x + 3 2 , x = − 1
Its apparent that y can take all real values except 1 ( ∵ x + 3 2 = 0 ) and also 0 since x = − 1 , so that range is not R . Hence c = 1
Finally we conclude c ∈ ( 0 , 1 )
0 + 1 = 1