A rectangle of perimeter 44 is partitioned into 5 congruent rectangles as indicated in the diagram. The perimeter of each of the congruent rectangle is
Details and Assumptions :
Figure not to scale.
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
length=x u said then why 3y instead of 3x?
Log in to reply
Length here means the longer side of the rectangle, not the side of the rectangle that is parallel to the x-axis in a coordinate plane. Therefore, width here means the shorter side of the rectangle.
x is the length of one of the small rectangles, while y is the width of one of the small rectangles. If you pay close attention to the left side of the big rectangle, it is equal to 3y, or 3 of the width of the small rectangles.
I like it.
2 long sides (A) = 3 short sides (B) ---> 2A = 3B ---> A = (3/2)B
Perimeter Total (Pt) = 4A + 5B = 44
Perimeter Small (Ps) = 2A + 2B
Pt = 4(3/2)B + 5B = 44 ---> 11B = 44 ---> B = 4
A = (3/2)4 ---> A =6
Ps = 2A + 2B ---> 2(6) + 2(4) = 20
There are 5 short sides (x) and 4 long sides (y)which make up the perimeter of 44 units.
5x + 4y = 44
A single congruent rectangle's perimeter is 2 long sides and 2 short.
2x + 2y = ???
2x is approx. 0.5 (5x) and 2y is 0.5 (4y). If everything halved exactly (ie if 4x + 4y = 44), the answer would be 22. 4x + 4y = 44 (÷2) --> 2x + 2y = 22
However, using the above equations:
5x + 4y = 44 (2) --> 2.5x + 2y = 22 2x + 2y < 2.5x + 2y Therefore the answer will be less than 22, but not by much
Therefore perimeter of congruent rectangle = 20 (closest answer which is less than 22).
(This is just educated guesswork, I've not done formal mathematics since AS Levels 😂)
You can simplify to 6long and 2short 44=6L+2S Then the short side is 1/3 size of a long or L=1.5S Substitute so all in short 44=(6x1.5=9)+2S=11S so S=4 L=1.5xS=6 Check your maths (6x6)+(2x4)=44 Then small rectangle = 2L+2S (2x6)+(2x4)=20
Very nice sir
Ahhhmmm
let x=width, y=length
2x+2y = 44
so let's put width=10 length=12 (any may do tho);
2x+2y=44
2(10) + 2(12) = 44
20 + 24 = 44
ok?
so with that, let's get the area.
xy=A
(10)(12)= A
A= 120
so from 120 we divide it by 5 since congruence is absolute.
120/5 = 24
and from 24 (the area of the smaller rectangles), we get its factors which are all possible dimensions of the congruent rectangle.
XY (1)(24), perimeter 50; (2)(12), perimeter 28; (3)(8), perimeter 22; (4)(6), perimeter 20;
so why 20 is the answer? because I felt it. Joke, they are factors closest to 5, the point of congruence.
(I just came here to share. I don't really know what I'm talking about but heyy I got it correct!)
Let the length of the bigger rectangle be x and width be y. we get 2( x + y)= 44 ⇒ x + y = 22 let the length of the smaller rectangles be a and width be b so, x=3a and y=a+b If we place the 5 rectangles in a row in Such a way that the width of each rectangle touches the other, we find the area of the new rectangle to be ×Y = 5 ab therefore,x= 5ab/y = 5ab/a+ b putting ×=3a,we find b=( 3/2) a putting the values of X and y in the equation ×+y=22 and putting ( 3/2) a for b,we get a=4 and b = (3/ 2) X 4 = 6 therefore the perimeter of each smaller rectangle is 2( 4+6) = 20
Since what is given in the sketch does not give any of the given answer, let us try stacking the small ones on one another. Let small ones be X*Y. So the perimeter of the big is 2(X+5Y) = 44. Y=3 and so X=7. Smaller perimeter is 2(7 + 3)=20.
Interesting, but my concern is that the equation 2 ( X + 5 Y ) = 4 4 does not have a unique solution. One solution is Y = 3 , X = 7 , giving a perimeter for the small rectangles of 2 0 . But other possible integral solutions include Y = 4 , X = 2 , giving a perimeter for the small rectangles of 1 2 . and Y = 2 , X = 1 2 , giving a perimeter of 2 8 . So I think that the original configuration is a critical piece of information in the process of determining of a unique solution.
Log in to reply
Greeting. I agree with you. In fact I too would have come up with the same solution as your, had I not made calculation mistake, which made me see the solution I gave!!
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
Let the length of one of the small rectangles be x
Let the width of one of the small rectangles be y
Then
The length of the big rectangle = 3 y
The width of the big rectangle = x + y
Then
8 y + 2 x = 44 ...............................(1)
But, from the diagram
2 x = 3 y .........................................(2)
From (1), (2)
11 y = 44
y = 4
From (2)
x = 6
Then
The perimeter of each small rectangle = 2(6 + 4) = 20