Consecutive Numbers pt. 3

For every positive integer n , n, does there always exist n n consecutive positive integers such that none of them can be written in the form m k , m^k, where m m and k k are positive integers with k > 1 k > 1 ?

Yes No

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

1 solution

Steven Yuan
Jul 20, 2017

Let p 1 , p 2 , , p n p_1, p_2, \dots, p_n be distinct prime numbers. To prove that there exists n n consecutive integers that are not perfect powers, we can show that the i i th number is congruent to p i p_i modulo p i 2 , p_i^2, since that would imply that the exponent on p i p_i is exactly 1, which disqualifies the number from being a perfect power.

Thus, we must find a positive integer x x such that x + i p i ( m o d p i 2 ) x + i \equiv p_i \! \pmod{p_i^2} for i = 1 , 2 , , n . i = 1, 2, \dots, n. By the Chinese Remainder Theorem, there exists a solution x x to this system. This choice of x x guarantees that all of x + 1 , x + 2 , , x + n x + 1, x + 2, \dots, x + n are not the perfect power of any positive integer. \blacksquare

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...