1 1 + 3 1 + 6 1 + 1 0 1 + 1 5 1 + …
Find the value of the series of reciprocals of triangle numbers.
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
We note that the series of triangle numbers is:
{ 1 , 3 , 6 , 1 0 . . . } = { 1 , ( 1 + 2 ) , ( 1 + 2 + 3 ) , ( 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 ) . . . }
Its n t h term is given: T n = k = 1 ∑ n k = 2 n ( n + 1 ) Therefore, the sum of the series of reciprocals of triangle numbers is: S = n = 1 ∑ ∞ n ( n + 1 ) 2 = 2 n = 1 ∑ ∞ ( n 1 − n + 1 1 ) = 2 ( 1 1 ) = 2
Firstly we use partial fractions: n ( n + 1 ) 1 = n a + ( n + 1 ) b ⇒ a(n+1) + bn = 1. Let n=-1 gives b= -1 then a= 1 so r + 1 ∑ ∞ n ( n + 1 ) 2 = 2 × r + 1 ∑ ∞ ( n 1 − n + 1 1 ) = 2 ( ( 1 − 2 1 ) + ( 2 1 − 3 1 ) + ( 3 1 − 4 1 ) + . . . ) = 2
Nice soultion
double x=0; int a=0; for(int i=1;i<=20000;i++) { x+= 1/(double)(i+a); a=i+a;}
printf("%10.9lf",x);
This solution has been marked wrong. You have only evaluated the value k = 1 ∑ 2 0 0 0 0 1 + 2 + … + k 1 , when in fact, we want to find the series n → ∞ lim k = 1 ∑ n 1 + 2 + … + k 1 . Furthermore, please refrain from posting a program code when one isn't required.
(1 + 1/ 3) + (1/ 3 + 1/ 5)/ 2 + (1/ 5 + 1/ 7)/ 3 + (1/ 7 + 1/ 9)/ 4 + ...
1 + 1/ 3 x 3/ 2 + 1/ 5 x 5/ 6 + 1/ 7 x 7/ 12 + 1/ 9 x 9/ 20 + ...
1 + 1/ 2 + 1/ 6 + 1/ 12 + 1/ 20 + 1/ 30 + ...
1 + 1/ 2 + 1/ 2 x 1/ 3 + 1/ 3 x 1/ 4 + 1/ 4 x 1/ 5 + 1/ 5 x 1/ 6 + ...
1 + 1/ 2 + 1/ 2 - 1/ 3 + 1/ 3 - 1/ 4 + 1/ 4 - 1/ 5 + ...
2
This solution is not entirely clear. You need to mention that the remaining terms are canceled out pairwise.
If you take the numbers given, and add them together, you get 1 and 2/3. Adding the next number in the series gives you 1 and 5/7. If you keep doing this, the answer will get closer and closer to 2, and as the series is infinite, that's the answer.
This solution has been marked wrong. You have only shown that it gets closer to 2 , how would you know that the limit is actually 2 − 1 0 − 1 0 1 0 0 instead of 2 ? The series is infinite does not necessarily mean that the sum is convergent.
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
The n th denominator is of the form 2 n ( n + 1 ) , so the series can be written as
k = 1 ∑ ∞ n ( n + 1 ) 2 = 2 ∗ k = 1 ∑ ∞ ( n 1 − n + 1 1 ) = 2 ∗ 1 = 2 ,
as this is a telescoping series.