Cosine as a difference of Increasing Functions

Calculus Level 5

Let f ( x ) = cos x f(x)=\cos x for any x x in the interval [ 0 , 4 π ] . [0, 4\pi]. Assume that there are two strictly increasing function f 1 f_1 and f 2 f_2 on the interval [ 0 , 4 π ] , [0, 4\pi], such that f = f 1 f 2 , f=f_1-f_2, f 1 ( 0 ) = 1 , f_1(0)=1, and f 2 ( 0 ) = 0. f_2(0)=0. Find the largest number c , c, if it exists, such that f 1 ( 4 π ) > c f_1( 4\pi)>c for all possible functions f 1 f_1 and f 2 f_2 as they were defined above. If c c exists, enter its value. If c c does not exist, enter -1.

Note: A function h h defined on an interval I I is called strictly increasing on I I if the following implication is true for all x 1 x_1 and x 1 x_1 in I I : x 1 < x 2 x_1< x_2 implies that f ( x 1 ) < f ( x 2 ) . f(x_1)<f(x_2).


The answer is 5.

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

3 solutions

Arturo Presa
Jun 6, 2020

First, we are going to state and prove the following simple Lemma.

Lemma: If a function g ( x ) g(x) is strictly increasing on the interval [ a , b ] [a,b] and g ( x ) = g 1 ( x ) g 2 ( x ) g(x)=g_1(x)-g_2(x) for all x x in the interval [ a , b ] , [a,b], where g 1 g_1 and g 2 g_2 are both strictly increasing on the given interval. Then g 1 ( b ) > g 1 ( a ) + g ( b ) g ( a ) . g_1(b)>g_1(a)+g(b)-g(a).

Proof of the Lemma: Of course, g 2 ( x ) = g 1 ( x ) g ( x ) g_2(x)=g_1(x)-g(x) for all x x in [ a , b ] , [a,b], and g 2 g_2 is strictly increasing on that interval. Then g 2 ( b ) > g 2 ( a ) . g_2(b)>g_2(a). Using that g 2 = g g 1 , g_2=g-g_1, we get that g 1 ( b ) g ( b ) > g 1 ( a ) g ( a ) . g_1(b)-g(b)> g_1(a)-g(a). Therefore, g 1 ( b ) > g 1 ( a ) + g ( b ) g ( a ) . g_1(b)>g_1(a)+g(b)-g(a). So, the lemma is proved.

Now, let solve the problem. The existence of the functions f 1 f_1 and f 2 f_2 follows from the fact that the function f f is a bounded variation function. We are going to start proving that f 1 ( 4 π ) > 5. f_1(4\pi) >5.

1) f 1 ( π ) > f 1 ( 0 ) = 1 , f_1(\pi)>f_1(0)=1, due to the fact that f 1 f_1 is increasing on the interval [ 0. π ] . [0. \pi].

2) f 1 ( 2 π ) > f 1 ( π ) + 2 f_1 (2\pi)> f_1(\pi)+2 , using the fact that f f is increasing on [ π , 2 π ] , [\pi, 2\pi], and the Lemma

3) f 1 ( 3 π ) > f 1 ( 2 π ) , f_1(3\pi)> f_1(2\pi), due to the fact that f 1 f_1 is increasing on the interval [ 2 π , 3 π ] . [2\pi, 3\pi].

4) f 1 ( 4 π ) > f 1 ( 3 π ) + 2 , f_1(4\pi)> f_1(3\pi) +2, using the fact that f f is increasing on [ 3 π , 4 π ] , [3\pi, 4\pi], and the Lemma

Combining these four inequalities, we obtain that f 1 ( 4 π ) > 5. f_1(4\pi) >5.

Now, we will prove that c = 5. c=5. Since we already have that f 1 ( 4 π ) > 5 f_1(4\pi) >5 is always true, this proves that c 5. c\geq 5. Then to prove that c c cannot be greater than 5, it would be enough to construct two families of strictly increasing functions f 1 , t f_{1,t} and f 2 , t f_{2,t} (parametrized by a positive number t t ) defined on the interval [ 0 , 4 π ] [0, 4\pi] such that f ( x ) = f 1 , t ( x ) f 2 , t ( x ) f(x) = f_{1,t}(x)-f_{2,t}(x) and such that lim t > 0 + f 1 , t ( 4 π ) = 5. \lim_{t->0^+}{f_{1,t}(4\pi)}=5.

The rest of the proof explains the construction of these two families of functions. We start our construction, defining the function f ˉ 1 \bar {f}_1 in the following way:

f ˉ 1 ( x ) = { 1 , 0 x π cos x + 2 , π x 2 π 3 , 2 π x 3 π cos x + 4 , 3 π x 4 π \bar {f}_1(x) = \left\{ \begin{array}{ll} 1, & \quad 0\leq x \leq \pi \\ \cos x +2, & \quad \pi\leq x \leq 2\pi \\ 3, & \quad 2\pi\leq x \leq 3\pi \\ \cos x+4, & \quad 3\pi\leq x \leq 4\pi \end{array} \right. and we define f ˉ 2 ( x ) = f ( x ) f ˉ 1 ( x ) . \bar {f}_2(x)=f(x)- \bar {f}_1(x). These two functions that we have defined are non-decreasing on the interval [ 0 , 4 π ] [0, 4\pi] and f = f ˉ 1 f ˉ 2 , f=\bar{f}_1-\bar{f}_2, f ˉ 1 ( 0 ) = 1 , f ˉ 2 ( 0 ) = 0. \bar{f}_1(0)=1, \bar{f}_2(0)=0. Now for any positive real number t , t, we define f 1 , t ( x ) = f ˉ 1 ( x ) + t x f_{1,t}(x)= \bar{f}_1(x) +tx and f 2 , t ( x ) = f ˉ 2 ( x ) + t x . f_{2,t}(x)= \bar{f}_2(x) +tx. It is obvious that these two functions are strictly increasing and f ( x ) = f 1 , t ( x ) f 2 , t ( x ) , f(x) = f_{1,t}(x)-f_{2,t}(x), f 1 , t ( 0 ) = 1 , f 2 , t ( 0 ) = 0. f_{1,t}(0)=1, f_{2,t}(0)=0. Besides that, lim t > 0 + f 1 , t ( 4 π ) = f ˉ 1 ( 4 π ) = 5. \lim_{t->0^+}{f_{1,t}(4\pi)}=\bar{f}_1(4\pi)= 5. Therefore, the answer to this question is 5 . \boxed{5}.

Qweros Bistoros
Jun 6, 2020

f 1 ( 2 π ) = f 2 ( 2 π ) + c o s ( 2 π ) = f 2 ( 2 π ) + 1 > f 2 ( π ) + 1 = f 1 ( π ) c o s ( π ) + 1 = f 1 ( π ) + 2 > f 1 ( 0 ) + 2 f_1(2\pi)=f_2(2\pi)+cos(2\pi)=f_2(2\pi)+1>f_2(\pi)+1=f_1(\pi)-cos(\pi)+1=f_1(\pi)+2>f_1(0)+2

f 1 ( 4 π ) = f 2 ( 4 π ) + c o s ( 4 π ) = f 2 ( 4 π ) + 1 > f 2 ( 3 π ) + 1 = f 1 ( 3 π ) c o s ( 3 π ) + 1 = f 1 ( 3 π ) + 2 > f 1 ( 2 π ) + 2 f_1(4\pi)=f_2(4\pi)+cos(4\pi)=f_2(4\pi)+1>f_2(3\pi)+1=f_1(3\pi)-cos(3\pi)+1=f_1(3\pi)+2>f_1(2\pi)+2

f 1 ( 4 π ) > f 1 ( 2 π ) + 2 > f 1 ( 0 ) + 2 + 2 = 5 f_1(4\pi)>f_1(2\pi)+2>f_1(0)+2+2=5

This only proves that c 5. c\geq 5.

Arturo Presa - 1 year ago
Ryan S
Jun 7, 2020

A non-rigorous approach

f 1 f_1 strictly increases f 1 > 0 sin ( x ) + f 2 > 0 f 2 ( x ) > sin ( x ) \implies f_1^\prime>0\implies -\sin(x)+f_2^\prime>0\implies f_2^\prime(x)>\sin(x)

f 2 f_2 strictly increases f 2 > 0 \implies f_2^\prime>0

f 2 > max ( 0 , sin ( x ) ) \implies f_2^\prime>\max(0,\sin(x))

Visualizing, f 2 f_2 increases by at least the area under one sine 'hump', 2, every 2 π 2\pi increase in x x

f 1 = f + f 2 f_1=f+f_2 , intuitively, shows that minimizing f 2 f_2 minimizes f 1 f_1

Wherefore, as there are two sine 'humps' between x = 0 x=0 and x = 4 π x=4\pi and f 1 ( 0 ) = 1 f_1(0)=1 , f 1 ( 4 π ) > 1 + 2 × 2 f_1(4\pi)>1+2\times2

You are assuming that the functions f 1 f_1 and f 2 f_2 are differentiable everywhere on the interval which is not given. At the same time, what you have proved is that c 5 c\geq 5 So you need to prove also that c c cannot be greater than 5.

Arturo Presa - 1 year ago

1 pending report

Vote up reports you agree with

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...