Counting Your Ancestors Is Easy, If This Doesn't Happen

Algebra Level 2

By checking the family tree, Zilly Zonkers knows that his family has avoided inbreeding. If he were to trace through 5 previous generations to his great - great - great - grand parents, how many ancestors would he have counted?

Image credit: Wikipedia
30 64 62 32

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

8 solutions

Adrian Delgado
Mar 4, 2014

In the fifth generation we have 2 5 2 ^ 5 ancestors

In the fourth generation as each previous ancestor had only one child we have to the number of people from that generation is 2 5 2 = 2 4 \dfrac{2 ^ 5}{2} = 2 ^ 4

In the third generation, similarly we have 2 3 2 ^ 3 ancestors

In the second generation we have 2 2 2 ^ 2 ancestors

And finally, in the first generation we have 2 2 ancestors

Note: we considered the previous generations and Zilly is not an ancestor.

Soon we have

2 + 2 2 + 2 3 + 2 4 + 2 5 = ( 1 + 2 + 2 2 + 2 3 + 2 4 + 2 5 ) 1 = ( 2 6 1 ) 1 = 63 1 = 62 2+2^2+2^3+2^4+2^5=(1+2+2^2+2^3+2^4+2^5)-1=(2^6-1)-1=63-1=62 ancestors.

It's much easier with the picure LOL

Troy Ornieta - 7 years, 3 months ago

Log in to reply

loll

math man - 7 years, 2 months ago

This confused me because I focused on "Great great grandparents", which takes us to 5 generations (including Zilly) and gives 30 ancestors. To go to 5 PREVIOUS generations, you would get to "Great great great grandparents" it seems to me.
So the statement of the problem seems contradictory. Am I mixed up somehow?

Steven Perkins - 7 years, 3 months ago

Log in to reply

The question states that Zilly looked through 5 previous generations, with the key word being "previous", so we know to look at the 5 prior to Zilly, rather than the 4 prior and Zilly.

Hopefully this helps clear things up.

Alex Panebianco - 7 years, 3 months ago

No, you're correct. I included Zilly to, for he counts as one of the generations.

Nathan Blanco - 7 years, 1 month ago

Log in to reply

Wait, I just reread the question, and it said previous generations. I'm such a fool! How did I not notice that!

Nathan Blanco - 7 years, 1 month ago

Yes, I got 30 originally because of the problem wording. Maybe this should be specified more clearly in the problem.

Lee Wall - 7 years, 3 months ago

Steven I agree. If you stop at great-great-grandparents, you have 2 parents + 4 grandparents + 8 great-grandparents + 16 great-great-grandparents = 30 ancestors.

Sam Dreilinger - 7 years, 3 months ago

i'm not sure!!...62

Rommel Cabo - 7 years, 3 months ago

62

iqra akram - 7 years, 3 months ago

62

James Carlo Rodriguez - 7 years, 3 months ago
Afia Boakye
Mar 7, 2014

I doubled the amount all the way up to the 5th generation and then I added all the numbers that I found. So it was 2+4+8+16+32 which gave me a total of 62. I dont think it was the "smartacular" way but I just wanted to share how I got my answer.

same here,62

Yssa Mae Benosa - 7 years, 3 months ago
Marchan Sy
Mar 6, 2014

Its a geometric sequence with first term(x)=2, number of terms(n)=5 and common rate(r)=2 * since for every parent we have 2 grandparents(given the condition of no inbreeding)*. The formula for this is x{(1-r^n)/(1-r)}, if you followed PEMDAS you'll get 62 by substituting the givens. :)

Nupur Ambani
Mar 5, 2014

by counting the nos in pic

That does make it somewhat easier but I don't think that was the author's intention. :)

Alex Panebianco - 7 years, 3 months ago
Kevin Mo
Apr 11, 2014

This problem seems overrated... Just saying..

You have a family tree with two parents. Each parent gave birth to two children. It repeats with these children, over, and over, and over, again. (observe the picture)

So you have: 2 2 , which is from the two great parents (let's just leave it at that) and two + two babies, from the above description, which is 2 2 2^2 . Hmmm.... If we continue, and these four 'parents' go on to create two babies each, it becomes 8 8 , or 2 3 2^3 . It continues on until we reach five generations.

So our answer is, by adding up the ancestors, or "parents", we get 2 + 4 + 8 + 16 + 32 2+4+8+16+32 , which is 2 + 20 + 40 2+20+40 , which is finally 62 Ans. \boxed{62} \textbf{ Ans.}

Karina Hajdu
Mar 11, 2014

It's a really simple geometric progression that goes multiplying by 2

Aritri Chatterjee
Mar 10, 2014

SIMPLY , a progression of 32, 16, 8... so on till 2 ... find the sigma. is 62

Vegabond Bhai
Mar 6, 2014

for father 2.....for grandfather 2 2.....for great grandfather 4 2......then 8 2+16 2.sum=62

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...