$\mathfrak{Court}\space \mathfrak{problem}$

Logic Level 3

If you are a judge there's a trial then the petitioner said "He kill my friend inside of his kitchen". Then the respondent said "No I don't kill him!" what is your option to solve the trial of case?

To prove that the petitioners statement is true To have a star witness Getting stress of these two nonsense Nothing to do? To judge without testifying or investigation

1 solution

Alex Williams
Mar 29, 2016

The grammatical errors in this problem make it a little hard to understand. Making my first thought be that this might be a court system in a country other than in the U.S.A. but them I thought " any court system that can call itself a court must have some form of evidence". And the witness was the only solution that satisfied my thinking

That's it only the witness can prove that who is a suspect.

A Former Brilliant Member - 5 years, 2 months ago

It really confused me. Why is option "To prove that the petitioners statement is true" is marked as false? I would argue that the one with witness and this one are both correct. You can't prove anything without solid proof. Such proof could be either witness or some items found in the kitchen. You don't always need a witness to solve a crime.

Zyberg NEE - 5 years, 2 months ago

What is star witness?

Kay Xspre - 5 years, 2 months ago

A star witness is a witness who provides major and crucial information in a criminal case. In some instances, a case may have several star witnesses, and their testimony may cinch a conviction or acquittal, especially when handled by a skilled lawyer.

A Former Brilliant Member - 5 years, 2 months ago

$\mathfrak{Court}\space \mathfrak{problem}$

1 solution

2 pending reports

Vote up reports you agree with

C o u r t p r o b l e m \mathfrak{Court}\space \mathfrak{problem} C o u r t p r o b l e m

1 solution

2 pending reports

Vote up reports you agree with

$\mathfrak{Court}\space \mathfrak{problem}$