This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
How can you directly judge that ( 2 . 5 ) 2 is greater that ( 0 . 6 ) 3 ? Can you provide a legit explanation for your conclusion?
@Tapas Mazumdar Is it ok now?
Log in to reply
Just fine. You can say that for whatever positive exponent a real number between 0 and 1 is raised it will always tend to zero as powers get large. Not just 'squares' (which you have incorrectly mentioned) or cubes.
I think you are Bangali , Same here :)
2 7 < 1 2 5 3 3 < 5 3 ( 5 3 ) 3 < 1 4 < 2 5 2 2 < 5 2 1 < ( 2 5 ) 2 ⟹ ( 5 3 ) 3 < 1 < ( 2 5 ) 2 ⟹ ( 5 3 ) 3 < ( 2 5 ) 2 ⟹ A < B ⟹ B > A
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
We can see that ( 3 / 5 ) 3 = ( 0 . 6 ) 3 and and ( 5 / 2 ) 2 = ( 2 . 5 ) 2 , So now we can see that ( 0 . 6 ) 3 will tend more towards 0 or for numbers lesser that 1 we can see that their square tends more towards 0 and for ( 5 / 2 ) 2 = ( 2 . 5 ) 2 will tend towards obviously towards number greater than 3 . So ( 2 . 5 ) 2 > ( 0 . 6 ) 3