Cube Sphere Intersection, Part II

Calculus Level 4

Consider the cube C = [ 1 , 1 ] 3 C=[-1,1]^3 and the sphere S S given by ( x 3 2 ) 2 + ( y 1 ) 2 + ( z 1 2 ) 2 = 4 (x-\frac{3}{2})^2+(y-1)^2+(z-\frac{1}{2})^2=4 . Find the surface area A A of C S C \cap S . In other words, we are looking for the surface area A A of the portion of the sphere which resides within the cube.

As your answer, enter the integer nearest to 1000 A 1000A .

Inspiration


The answer is 5167.

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

2 solutions

Otto Bretscher
Dec 19, 2018

Comrade Huan has written an elegant solution in spherical coordinates. For the sake of variety, let me propose a solution in Cartesian coordinates.

As in an earlier problem, I will rearrange things a bit to make it easier to "wrap my head around" this problem. Let's place the center of the sphere at ( 0 , 0 , 0 ) (0,0,0) and the center of the cube at ( 0.5 , 1.5 , 1 ) (0.5,1.5,1) (I'm permuting the coordinates). The surface S = C S S'=C\cap S whose area we seek is the graph of the function z = 4 x 2 y 2 z=\sqrt{4-x^2-y^2} on the region D D given by 1.5 x 0.5 1.5\geq x \geq -0.5 and 4 x 2 y 0.5 \sqrt{4-x^2}\geq y \geq 0.5 . With the scaling factor being N = 2 4 x 2 y 2 ||\vec{N}||=\frac{2}{\sqrt{4-x^2-y^2}} , the area we seek is A = 0.5 1.5 0.5 4 x 2 2 4 x 2 y 2 d y d x 5.1674 A=\int_{-0.5}^{1.5}\int_{0.5}^{\sqrt{4-x^2}}\frac{2}{\sqrt{4-x^2-y^2}}\ dy\ dx\approx 5.1674 The required answer is 5167 \boxed{5167} .

Huan Bui
Dec 19, 2018

I performed a single (but rather painstaking) computation on my trusted Wolfram's Mathematica program:

A = θ = cos 1 ( 1 4 ) θ = π cos 1 ( 3 4 ) ϕ = π ϕ = π + cos 1 ( 1 / 2 2 sin θ ) ( 2 2 ) sin ( θ ) d ϕ d θ 5.167 A = \int_{\theta = \cos^{-1}\left( \frac{1}{4}\right) }^{\theta= \pi - \cos^{-1}\left(\frac{3}{4} \right) } \int_{\phi = \pi}^{\phi = \pi + \cos^{-1}\left( \frac{1/2}{2\sin\theta}\right) } (2^2)\sin(\theta)\,d\phi\,d\theta \approx 5.167 .

So, the answer is 1000 A 5167 1000A \approx \boxed{5167} .


Most of the work lies in figuring out the bounds on θ \theta and ϕ \phi in the integral. 0 θ π 0 \leq \theta \leq \pi is the angle measured from the z z' -axis, and 0 ϕ 2 π 0 \leq \phi \leq 2\pi is the angle measured from the x x' -axis in the x y x'y' -plane, where the ( x , y , z ) (x',y',z') is a new coordinate system such that the sphere is centered at ( 0 , 0 , 0 ) (0,0,0) . It is not hard to see that the sphere is centered at ( 3 2 , 1 , 1 2 ) \left( \frac{3}{2}, 1, \frac{1}{2} \right) in ( x , y , z ) (x,y,z) , and that the top and bottom of the cube intersect the sphere at z = 1 z = -1 and z = + 1 z = +1 , respectively. This means, in ( x , y , z ) (x',y',z') , cos 1 ( 1 4 ) θ π cos 1 ( 3 4 ) \cos^{-1}\left( \frac{1}{4}\right) \leq \theta \leq \pi - \cos^{-1}\left(\frac{3}{4} \right) .

It's a little trickier to find the bounds for ϕ \phi , since we first have to realize the bounds of ϕ \phi depend on the latitude of the intersection, or the angle θ \theta . From top view, π ϕ = cos 1 ( 1 / 2 2 sin θ ) \pi \leq \phi = \cos^{-1}\left( \frac{1/2}{2\sin\theta}\right) . Therefore, we get π ϕ π + cos 1 ( 1 / 2 2 sin θ ) \pi \leq\phi\leq \pi + \cos^{-1}\left( \frac{1/2}{2\sin\theta}\right) .

Lastly, we know that the area element of a sphere of radius R R is d A = R 2 sin θ d ϕ d θ dA = R^2\sin\theta\,d\phi\,d\theta , then put everything together to get the above integral and compute.

Very nicely done, Comrade! Thank you! I'm chagrined to see, though, that you are reversing the roles of θ \theta and ϕ \phi , like those physicists do ;)

Otto Bretscher - 2 years, 5 months ago

I have to admit that I've always reversed (as you say) the roles of ϕ \phi and θ \theta , through the entire course of MA262. In fact, I never adapted the your notation, in problem sets, exams, or even in my lecture notes...

Huan Bui - 2 years, 5 months ago

Log in to reply

Yes, Comrade, it is interesting how we tend to cling to the notations we first learn; we are such creatures of habit. For me, it is almost impossible to read a paragraph in the reversed notation; I would have to rewrite it first. We tend to look for reasons that "our" notation is better, for example, one could point out that θ \theta plays an analogous role in polar, cylindrical, and spherical coordinates.

Otto Bretscher - 2 years, 5 months ago

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...