Identical rectangular cardboard pieces are handed out to 30 students, one to each. Each student cuts (parallel to the edges) his or her piece into equally large squares. Two different students’ squares do not necessarily have the same size. After all the cutting it turns out that the total number of squares is a prime.
What is the ratio between the long and the short side of the original cardboard piece?
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
Since the rectangle can be cut into squares, suppose that the side of the largest possible square is x . Then the height and width of the rectangle must be h = m x and w = n x for positive integers m , n . If d > 1 was a common factor of m and n , then the rectangle could be cut into squares of side d x , which would contradict the maximality of x . Thus m and n are coprime.
Suppose that the rectangle can be cut into squares of side length y . Then we can find positive integers M , N such that h = M y and w = N y , and hence m N = n M . Since m , n are coprime, this means that m divides M and n divides N . Cutting the rectangle into y × y square yields M N squares, so always yields a multiple of m n squares. Thus the total number of squares obtained by the class must be a multiple of m n . Since this total number is prime, we deduce that m = n = 1 , and hence h = w , and the rectangle is in fact a square.
A total of 3 0 x × x squares can be cut into
which makes a total of ( 2 8 × 9 ) + 4 + 1 = 2 5 7 squares, which is a prime number. Thus it is possible to do the cutting as described when the rectangle is in fact a square, and so the ratio of the height to the width of the rectangle is 1 .