In many discussions on internet, we can see some criationists saying that the evolution, as proposed by Darwin, contradicts the beautiful Second Law of Thermodynamics, which states that no isolated system can decrease its entropy. The process of evolution, which we can see as a bunch of separated molecules coming more and more together to form all sort of complex creatures, would cause a decrease in entropy of the isolated system, Earth - so they say. This argument is mistaken, because:
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
To calculate entropy change in the process of whole evolution is probably impossible. Many biochemical reactions works with a decrease in entropy, but always with a decrease in Gibbs free energy too. Therefore, we cannot say for sure that the decomposition of the living creatures or the gas they release is sufficient to balance this biochemical reactions, which could or not result in a positive increase in entropy for the system Earth. But notice that Earth itself is not sujected to the limitations of the Second Law, because it's not an isolated system. An isolated system can't interchange energy with its surrounds. Earth, instead, is constantly receiving energy from the sun light. Hence, it doesn't matter if its entropy increases or decreases within the process of Evolution, because it doesn't need to increase in order to still satisfy all Thermodynamic known laws.