52 of 100: Solve It Like Mondrian

Algebra Level 1

A 16 × 18 16 \times 18 rectangle is cut into smaller rectangles. Some of the areas of the pieces are given above. (The figure is not drawn to scale.) What is the area of the pink rectangle?

Finding the answer is much easier than proving it! There is nothing in the problem that indicates the sides have to be integers. If you like this problem, you may enjoy our Problems of the Week , including the problem this one was based off of .

15 16 17 18

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

20 solutions

Kazem Sepehrinia
Jul 21, 2017

Notice that a b = 120 ab=120 and ( 16 b ) ( 18 a ) = 24 (16-b)(18-a)=24 . Put first in second to get ( 16 b ) ( 18 120 b ) = 24 (16-b)(18-\frac{120}{b})=24 . This is a quadratic for b b and it has two solutions: b = 40 3 b=\frac{40}{3} and b = 8 b=8 . On the other hand b d = 40 25 = 8 5 \frac{b}{d}=\frac{40}{25}=\frac{8}{5} . Thus, d = 5 8 b d=\frac58 b .

For b = 40 3 b=\frac{40}{3} we get d = 5 8 × 40 3 = 25 3 d=\frac58 \times \frac{40}{3}=\frac{25}{3} , which in turn gives b + d = 65 3 > 16 b+d=\frac{65}{3}>16 . This is impossible.

b = 8 b=8 gives d = 5 8 × 8 = 5 d=\frac58 \times 8=5 and c = 16 8 5 = 3 c=16-8-5=3 . Finally x = 48 b × c = 18 x=\frac{48}{b} \times c=\boxed{18} .

The question does not state that b b is an integer, so we need to exclude the second solution b = 40 3 b=\tfrac{40}{3} of your quadratic. We can do this because we would have to have d > 8 3 d > \tfrac83 to obtain the bottom-left area of 25 25 ...

Mark Hennings - 3 years, 10 months ago

Log in to reply

Yes, the value of b = 40 / 3 b=40/3 results in b + c + d > 16 b+c+d>16 . I'll add this to the solution.

Kazem Sepehrinia - 3 years, 10 months ago

Great explanation! Valid reasoning with no assumptions :)

Luis Salazar - 3 years, 10 months ago
Kevin Tran
Jul 20, 2017

I don't think this quite proves uniqueness. I'm also unclear where the 8 came from.

Jason Dyer Staff - 3 years, 10 months ago

Log in to reply

Since 25 is 5x5, 40/5 is 8.

Kevin Tran - 3 years, 10 months ago

Log in to reply

You assumed the lengths are whole numbers! You! :) (I did that too...)

Kevin Chris Marcelo - 3 years, 10 months ago

over professional solution

Rishi Raj - 3 years, 10 months ago

Log in to reply

ha ha ha.....

Mohammad Khaza - 3 years, 10 months ago

how did you get 8?

Mohammad Khaza - 3 years, 10 months ago

Log in to reply

Since 25 is 5x5, 40/5 is 8.

Kevin Tran - 3 years, 10 months ago

Although this is how I solved it... we aren't told the rectangle with an area of 25 is a square or that side lengths are whole numbers.

Jacob Walter - 3 years, 10 months ago
William Godfrey
Jul 22, 2017

25 can only be expressed as 5*5, so the height and base of the dark blue rectangle are both 5.

Breaking down each other rectangle into their prime factors allows you to work out their side lengths.

The orange rectangle has a base of 8 and the dark blue has a base of 5.

5 + 8 + X = 16 (where X is the pink rectangle's base)

X = 3

The pink rectangle has a height of 6, so the area (6*3) is 18.

You are assuming that all the sides are integers.

Jason Dyer Staff - 3 years, 10 months ago

If this is how people feel, then just include an option of "there is not enough information to solve the problem." Problem solved.

Kevin Bourrillion - 3 years, 9 months ago

The Assumption was, however, a correct one. Math can be an 'A-Ha' moment just the same. Simple and eligant solution.

A Former Brilliant Member - 3 years, 10 months ago

Log in to reply

There are plenty of "Aha!" moments in Math, but they should come from proper reasoning, not improper reasoning that just happens to lead to the correct answer. Had this (or the many other solutions offered that assume integer sides) started with a proof that all the sides are integral, it would have been valid. As it is, the reasoning is resting on an unjustified assumption. Here, even though 18 is shown to be a possible answer, there remains the question of whether it's the unique answer. Other solutions here do not assume integer sides, and they demonstrate that 18 is, in fact, the sole correct answer.

Andy Lowry - 3 years, 10 months ago

Log in to reply

From the point of a pure mathematician I get your point @Andy Lowry , but for this problem you want an applied solution which you can find by trying integer sides first. A totally normal and logical first step which turns out to lead to the answer. The problem doesn't ask for more than one, so you don't need to look for non integer cases next to it, neither do you need proof there's no other possibility for this situation.

Peter van der Linden - 3 years, 10 months ago

I disagree. Lot's of math results are helped by a lucky or educated assumption on the very start. They don't come from a proper reasoning. Quite often just from a trial and error. The entire field of partial differential equations seems to be like that. Basically, you can do everything you like to solve a problem, assume a form of solution, solve an easier version and then perturb it, or summon the satan himself. All it matters is if the result works, the methods are not important. And yes, the method doesn't tell us if there are some other possible solutions. I guess we have to live with that.

Petr Liczman - 3 years, 10 months ago
Andy Lowry
Jul 22, 2017

Let x x be the area of the pink rectangle, and let y y be the area of the upper-right rectangle.

Then y 24 + y = 120 + y 288 \frac{y}{24+y} = \frac{120+y}{288} , which leads to a quadratic equation with two solutions: y = 24 y=24 or y = 120 y=120 . We can toss out 120, since then the total of y y and the areas of the given rectangles would be 289, which is larger than the entire outer rectangle.

So y = 24 y = 24 , which lets us calculate the heights of the vertical subdivision as 5, 6, 4, and 3 (totalling 18), from bottom to top.

It also shows us that the main vertical dividing line splits the outer rectangle into two identical halves.

So now we have x 6 = 40 25 5 = 3 \frac{x}{6} = \frac{40-25}{5} = 3 , so x = 18 x = \boxed{18} .

Mohammad Khaza
Jul 21, 2017

the length will be 6 and the width will be 3................[for the pink rectangle]

so, the area of the pink rectangle will be = 6 × 3 6\times 3 = 18 18 ...................[as the biggest common factor of 40 and 48 is 8 and also the other side of the rectangle with the area of 48 is 6. so, it should be like this:length =6 and width=16-(8+5) =16-13=3]

Nowhere in the problem did it state that lengths are all integers.

Andy Lowry - 3 years, 10 months ago

Log in to reply

obviously, but if you guess without integer you can not solve that.

Mohammad Khaza - 3 years, 10 months ago

Log in to reply

There are several solutions that do not guess, and arrive at the correct solution. Mine is one such.

Andy Lowry - 3 years, 10 months ago
Reuben Settergren
Jul 23, 2017

Extend the vertical line so 3 rectangles on the left are split, then by proportionality with the known rectangles on the right, two more rectangle areas can be filled in:

   24          ?

 24   ?       32

 30   ?       48

 25   ?       40

Collapse that to:

    24            A

 75    B         120

The total area is 16*18 = 288=A+B+24+75+120, so A+B = 69

       24           A

  75    (69-A)     120

For any rectangle subdivided into 4 smaller rectangles, the product of the diagonal areas is equal to the product of the off-diagonal areas (proof left to the reader), so

24 120 = ( 75 + 69 A ) A = ( 144 A ) A = 144 A A 2 24*120 = (75 + 69 - A)A = (144-A)A = 144A - A^2

A 2 144 A + 24 120 = 0 A^2 - 144A + 24*120=0

( A 24 ) ( A 120 ) = 0 (A-24)(A-120)=0

A=120 is not a valid solution (because then B=69-A would be negative), so A=24.

Since the top two rectangles are the same area (and the same height), they are the same width, each half of 16, namely 8. Thus all the blocks on the right are width 8. The 48 block is 8x6, so the pink box is also height 6. The 40 box is 8x5, so the purple is height 5 and thus 5x5, so the white box under pink has width 3, and so does the pink.

Pink box is height 6, width 3 ==> area 18.

the second row of the first graph should be 20 ? 32, nice solution though :)

Mehdi K. - 3 years, 10 months ago

LaTex: To find some of the values, let’s use the gcd : \large \text {To find some of the values, let's use the gcd :}

LaTex: gcd ( a × d , a × e , a × f ) = a = 2 3 = 8 so, a × f = 2 3 × 5 f = 5 \large \gcd(a\times d, a\times e, a\times f) = \boxed {a = 2^3 =8} \;\text{so, } \; a\times f = 2^3\times5 \iff \boxed{f=5}

LaTex: Thus : f × c 1 = 5 2 c 1 = 5 = f \large \text {Thus : } \; f\times c_1 = 5^2 \iff \boxed{c_1 = 5} = f

LaTex: Thus : 16 = a + c c = 2 3 = 8 = a and c c 1 = 3 \large \text {Thus :}\; 16 = a + c \iff \boxed{c=2^3=8} = a \; \text {and} \; \boxed{c - c_1= 3}

LaTex: a × e = 2 4 × 3 a × e = 2 3 × 6 e = 6 \large a\times e = 2^4\times 3 \iff a\times e = 2^3\times 6 \iff \boxed {e=6}

LaTex: Finally, the pink area is : ( c c 1 ) × e 3 × 6 = 18 \large \text {Finally, the pink area is : } \;\color{#E81990}{ (c-c_1) \times e} \color{#333333}{ \iff } \color{#D61F06}{3 \times 6 = \boxed {18}}

Does your use of GCD assume integer values?

Donal Stones - 3 years, 9 months ago
Auro Light
Jul 22, 2017

Let the area of pink rectangle be x. The area of blank rectangle on left of pink is (48/40)(25) = 30. Let the whole area of rectangle (30+x) = A.
Then in terms of A, the area of rectangles above and below it are (2/3)A {=(32/48)A} and (5/6)A {=(40/48)A} respectively. The area of top blank rectangle in terms of A is (48/A)(24).
So the total area of the figure can be written as (5/6)A +A+(2/3)A+24+(48×24/A)+120 = 16×18.
This simplifies to,
5A^2 - 288A + 48×48 = 0,
Or, (A - 48)(5A - 48) = 0,
Or, A = 30 + x = 48 or 48/5,
Or, x = 18 or -102/5,
Since x is not negative, so x = 18.







Nikita Mahilewets
Jul 21, 2017

Try every possible answer. I have started from 15 then picked 18 as second try and succeed.

didn't understand

Mohammad Khaza - 3 years, 10 months ago

Suppose you have possible answers A1, A2,..., AN. Then write each Ai in the form Ai=X*Y For every possible X and Y Then substitute X and Y as sides of pink rectangle.

Nikita Mahilewets - 3 years, 10 months ago
Danny Whittaker
Jul 21, 2017

Assuming integer divisions, the bottom left must be 5x5 and the Orange must be 8x5. It is then trivial to see that the pink is 3x6 giving an area of 18. But, will this always hold?

Let's label the width of the bottom left rectangle as x x . Then its height is 25 x \frac{25}{x} .

This means that the orange rectangle is also 25 x \frac{25}{x} tall and thus 8 x 5 \frac{8x}{5} long.

The 48 rectangle must be 30 x \frac{30}{x} tall.

So the pink rectangle is 16 13 x 5 16-\frac{13x}{5} wide by 30 x \frac{30}{x} tall.

The area is 480 x 78 \frac{480}{x}-78 .

But, what is x x ?

Following up, we see that the green rectangle must be 20 x \frac{20}{x} tall. Leaving 18 75 x 18-\frac{75}{x} for the height of the red rectangle.

Now the area of the red rectangle fits the equation:

( 18 75 x ) ( 16 8 x 5 ) = 24 (18-\frac{75}{x})(16-\frac{8x}{5})=24

This simplifies to:

3 x 2 40 x + 125 = 0 3x^2-40x+125=0

( 3 x 25 ) ( x 5 ) = 0 (3x-25)(x-5)=0

x = 25 3 x=\frac{25}{3} or x = 5 x=5

But, if x = 25 3 x=\frac{25}{3}

480 25 3 78 = 20.4 \frac{480}{\frac{25}{3}}-78=-20.4

This is clearly not possibly, so the only answer is when x = 5 x=5 and The area is 480 5 78 \frac{480}{5}-78 =18.

Nazanin Zareirad
Jul 21, 2017

The biggest common factor of 40 and 48 is 8, therefore the other side of the rectangle with the area of 48 is 6.
There is only 1 way of dividing 25 into 2 numbers that suits the base of the triangle and that is 5 * 5
16 - ( 8 + 5 ) = 3
3 * 6 = 18


So 3x6=18

K T
Jan 11, 2019

Let's say the pink area is x. By setting ratios equal, e.g we see that the area left of it must be 25 × 48 40 = 30 \frac{25×48}{40}=30 , and the area below it 40 x 48 = 5 6 x \frac{40x}{48}= \frac{5}{6}x . Expressing all four white areas in terms of x, we find 30, 5 6 x \frac{5}{6}x , 20 + 2 3 x 20+\frac{2}{3}x and 1152 30 + x \frac{1152}{30+x}

Now add up the total area:

24 + 1152 30 + x + 20 + 2 3 x + 32 + 30 + x + 48 + 25 + 5 6 x + 40 = 16 × 18 24+\frac{1152}{30+x}+ 20+\frac{2}{3}x+32+30+x+48+25+ \frac{5}{6}x+40=16×18 .

Simplify this to 1152 30 + x + 5 2 x = 69 \frac{1152}{30+x}+ \frac{5}{2}x=69

1152 + ( 30 + x ) ( 5 2 x 69 ) = 0 1152+(30+x)(\frac{5}{2}x-69)=0

1152 + 150 2 x + 5 2 x 2 2070 69 x = 0 1152+\frac{150}{2}x+\frac{5}{2}x^2-2070-69x=0

5 2 x 2 + 6 x 918 = 0 \frac{5}{2}x^2+6x-918=0

The nonnegative solution is x = 6 + 36 + 9180 5 = 90 5 = 18 x=\frac{-6 + \sqrt{36+9180}}{5} = \frac{90}{5}=\boxed{18}

Kushal Dey
Sep 21, 2017

The areas 25 and 40 have same breadth. So the breadth must be their HCF, which is 5. Hence their lengths are 5 & 8 respectively. Now the length of the required area becomes 3 on calculating. The breadth of the area is same as the area of 48, which is 6. Hence the area becomes 18.

Ian Clark
Sep 8, 2017

The 48 square is the highest. Logically, the area will be the largest.

Syrous Marivani
Jul 23, 2017

Let, the segment along the top be x, 16 – x, along the right side be

from bottom to top w, z, y, and 18 – q, where q = y + z + w; then

24 = x(18 – q) = -(16 - x)(18 – q) + 16(18 – q)

24 = 120 + 18x – 16q

8q – 9x= 48

-9(24) + 8q(18 – q) = 48(18 – q)

-27 + q(18 – q) = 108 – 6q

q^2 – 24q + 135 = 0

(q – 15)(q – 9) = 0

Therefore q = 9 0r 15. If q = 15, then 15(16 – x) = 120, 16 – x = 8, x = 8,

(16 – x)y = 32, y = 4, (16 – x)z = 48, z = 6, (16 – x)w = 40, w = 5.

Let the required area be A, and A’ the area of the rectangle on the left

of this rectangle be A’, then

Also, A’/25 = z/w = 6/5, so A’ = 30 = (x – t)z, 6(8 – t) = 30

6t = 18, t = 3.

Then

A = zt = 6(3) = 18.

If q = 9, then 9(16 – x) = 120, 48 – 3x = 40, 3x = 8, x = 8/3.

y(16 – x) = 32, y(40/3) = 32, y = 12/5.

z(16 – x) = 48, z(40/3) = 48, z = 18/5.

w(16 – x) = 40 w(40/3) = 40, w = 3.

As, before, A’ = 30 = (8/3 – t)(18/5) 25/9 = 8/3 – t, t = -1/9 which is

a contradiction.

Carlos Pittol
Jul 22, 2017

The right hand side rectangles all share the same length x x , and the red rectangle has length 16 x 16-x therefore: 40 x \frac{40}{x} + 48 x \frac{48}{x} + 32 x \frac{32}{x} + 24 16 x \frac{24}{16-x} = 18 = 18

Multiplying by x x gives 40 + 48 + 32 + 40 + 48 + 32 + 24 x 16 x \frac{24x}{16-x} = 18 x = 18x

120 + 120 + 24 x 16 x \frac{24x}{16-x} = 18 x = 18x

Multiplying by ( 16 x ) (16-x) gives 1920 120 x + 24 x = 288 x 18 x 2 1920 - 120x + 24x = 288x - 18x^2

Simplifying gives 1920 = 384 x 18 x 2 1920 = 384x - 18x^2

Factorising gives 320 = 64 x 3 x 2 320 = 64x - 3x^2

Solving the quadratic 3 x 2 + 64 x 320 -3x^2 + 64x - 320 gives x = 8 x = 8 or x = x = 40 3 \frac{40}{3}

Only x = 8 x=8 is a possible solution for this problem therefore the width of the orange rectangle is 40 / 8 = 5 40/8=5 and the purple 'rectangle' is actually a square with sides length 5. The length of the pink rectangle is therefore 16 8 5 = 3 16-8-5=3

The width of the blue or teal coloured rectangle is 48 / 8 = 6 48/8=6 . This equates to the width of the pink rectangle, so the area of the pink rectangle is 6 × 3 = 18 6\times3=18 .

Sundar R
Jul 22, 2017

The other solution is based on y having a value of 2.4 which seems to lead to non-integral solutions which is not amongst the given choices

Sundar R - 3 years, 10 months ago
Toby M
Jul 21, 2017

In this problem, it is possible to 'chase' down the lengths of other rectangles to find the side length of the pink rectangle: Notice that the purple rectangle's area is 25 25 , which has factors 1 , 5 , 25 1, 5, 25 . If one side were 25 25 , this would be bigger than both 16 16 or 18 18 , so the only option remaining is 5 5 and 5 5 . Following this, since the heights of the orange and purple rectangles are the same, the orange rectangle has a length of 40 5 = 8 \frac{40}{5} = 8 .

Since the largest rectangle has a width of 16 16 , the pink rectangle's length is t o t a l p u r p l e r e c t a n g l e o r a n g e r e c t a n g l e total - purple \ rectangle - orange \ rectangle or 16 5 8 16 - 5 - 8 , which is 3 3 .

We already know that the width of the orange rectangle is 8 8 . Because the turquoise and orange rectangles share a side, the turquoise rectangle's height is 48 8 = 6 \frac{48}{8} = 6 .

From this information we can deduce the length and width of the pink rectangle. Calculating ( 3 ) ( 6 ) (3)(6) gives the area of the rectangle, which is 18 18 .

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...