Decimal cryptarithm

Logic Level 4

E V E ÷ D I D = 0. T A L K T A L K T A L K T A L K \overline{EVE} \div \overline{DID} = 0. \overline{TALKTALKTALKTALK\ldots}

Given that E , V , D , I , T , A , L E,V,D,I,T,A,L and K K are distinct single digits, let E V E \overline{EVE} and D I D \overline{DID} be two coprime 3-digit positive integers and T A L K \overline{TALK} be a 4-digit integer, such that the equation above holds true, where the right hand side is a repeating decimal number .

Find the value of the sum E V E + D I D + T A L K \overline{EVE} + \overline{DID} + \overline{TALK} .


The answer is 8531.

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

2 solutions

Linkin Duck
Apr 12, 2017

By converting recurring decimals to fractions we have:

E V E D I D = T A L K 9999 E V E × 9 × 11 × 101 = D I D × T A L K \frac { \overline { EVE } }{ \overline { DID } } =\frac { \overline { TALK } }{ 9999 } \Longrightarrow \overline { EVE } \times 9 \times 11 \times 101=\overline { DID } \times \overline { TALK }

Since E V E \overline { EVE } and D I D \overline { DID } are coprime, and T A L K \overline { TALK } is not divisible by 101 101 ( T A L K a b b a \overline { TALK } \neq \overline { abba } ), D I D = 101 × k \overline { DID }=101\times k with k k is a factor of 9 9 , which then leads to D I D = 101 , 303 , 909 \overline { DID } =101, 303, 909 ( D I D \overline { DID } cannot also be divisible by 11).

  • If D I D = 101 \overline { DID } =101 : since E D I E\neq D\neq I , E 2 E V E × 99 > 10000 > T A L K E\ge 2\Longrightarrow \overline { EVE } \times 99>10000>\overline { TALK } , a contradiction.

  • If D I D = 909 \overline { DID } =909 : the alphanumeric puzzle E V E × 11 = T A L K \overline { EVE } \times 11=\overline { TALK } shows that E = K E=K , a contradiction.

  • If D I D = 303 \overline { DID } =303 : E V E × 33 = T A L K < 10000 , E D = 3 , K D = 3 \overline { EVE } \times 33=\overline { TALK } <10000,\quad E\neq D=3,\quad K\neq D=3

E < 3 , E 1 \Longrightarrow E<3,E\neq 1 so we fix E = 2 E=2 and K = 6 K=6 .

Next, we try each value of V V in condition that V T A L 0 , 2 , 3 , 6 V\neq T\neq A\neq L\neq 0,2,3,6 which then gives a unique result V = 4 , T = 7 , A = 9 , L = 8 V=4,T=7,A=9,L=8

Hence, E V E + D I D + T A L K = 242 + 303 + 7986 = 8531 \overline { EVE } +\overline { DID } +\overline { TALK } =242+303+7986=\boxed { 8531 }

Denton Young
May 23, 2016

Since the repeating decimal is 4 places long, DID must divide 9999. 999 = 9 * 11 * 101. So DID is a multiple of 101.

Since DID is only 3 digits long, it cannot also be a multiple of 11. So EVE must be a multiple of 11. Since EVE is palindromic, it must be 121, 242, 363, or 484.

DID and EVE cannot have any digits in common. DID > EVE. It is now simple to try the possibilities. 242/303 is the only one that works.

Moderator note:

I don't see why "Since DID is not a multiple of 11, hence EVE must be a multiple of 11". Can you elaborate further?

I think there is another solution : E V E ÷ D I D = 0. T A L K T A L K T A L K T A L K \overline{EVE} \div \overline{DID} = 0. \overline{TALKTALKTALKTALK\ldots}

878 ÷ 909 = 0. 9658965896589658 \overline{878} \div \overline{909} = 0. \overline{9658965896589658\ldots}

Hence, E V E + D I D + T A L K \overline{EVE} + \overline{DID} + \overline{TALK} can also be

                                   =    878+909+9658 = 11445

saharsh rathi - 4 years, 4 months ago

Log in to reply

Nope. That attempt has both E and K equal to 8. All the letters are different digits.

Denton Young - 4 years, 4 months ago

Log in to reply

Yes you are right . My mistake . :)

saharsh rathi - 4 years, 4 months ago

What about D I D = 606 DID=606 and E V E = 212 EVE=212 ? This gives T A L K = 3498 TALK = 3498 .

Log in to reply

DID and EVE are specified as being coprime, so this fails as both are divisible by 2.

Jennifer Feith - 5 years ago

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...