The diagram shows a black circle of radius
2
5
.
We drawn an horizontal black line to divide this circle into two circular segments. This line a length
4
8
.
Now we pack the top circulair segment with 3 types of circles :
Y
e
l
l
o
w
,
C
y
a
n
and
P
u
r
p
l
e
.
Then we pack the bottom circular segment with 3 types of circles :
G
r
e
e
n
,
R
e
d
and
P
i
n
k
Note : The two biggest yellow circles are congruent.
The bottom circular segment is larger than the top circular segment
We count the circles starting from the largest of its sequence to the right (or left) towards the infinitely small circles
We focus on the
C
y
a
n
and
R
e
d
circles in this problem. The largest
G
r
e
e
n
circle is the
0
t
h
circle of its sequence. The largest
Y
e
l
l
o
w
circle is the
0
t
h
circle of its sequence.
The question:
The radius of the
n
t
h
C
y
a
n
circle (for
n
≥
0
) can be expressed as
(
a
a
⋅
n
+
b
−
a
)
a
a
a
⋅
n
+
b
and the radius of the
n
t
h
R
e
d
circle (for
n
≥
0
) can be expressed as
(
d
(
a
⋅
n
+
b
−
a
)
+
b
−
a
)
a
c
⋅
d
(
n
+
b
−
a
)
where
a
,
b
,
c
,
d
are positive integers. Calculate
b
⋅
a
c
⋅
d
The answer is 18.
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
To solve this question you'll need the height of the circular segments and the radii of the
G
r
e
e
n
and
Y
e
l
l
o
w
circles. There is a solution for those steps in part 1 of this series.
Let's focus on the
C
y
a
n
circles. Using Descartes circle's theorem we find the 5 first
C
y
a
n
radii.
R
0
=
4
8
R
0
=
2
5
3
2
R
0
=
2
8
9
1
2
8
R
0
=
4
2
2
5
5
1
2
R
0
=
6
6
0
4
9
2
0
4
8
Let's look at the numerator, we easily see that it's each time an odd power of 2, then it can be written as
2
2
n
+
3
The denominator is also an easy challenge, we can rewritte them and spot a pattern:
4
=
(
2
)
2
=
(
4
0
+
1
)
2
2
5
=
(
5
)
2
=
(
4
1
+
1
)
2
2
8
9
=
(
1
7
)
2
=
(
4
2
+
1
)
2
4
2
2
5
=
(
6
5
)
2
=
(
4
3
+
1
)
2
6
6
0
4
9
=
(
2
5
7
)
2
=
(
4
4
+
1
)
2
We can conclude that the denominator can be written as
(
4
n
+
1
)
2
Finally
R
n
=
(
4
n
+
1
)
2
2
2
n
+
3
=
(
2
2
⋅
n
+
3
−
2
)
2
2
2
⋅
n
+
3
Then
a
=
2
and
b
=
3
Let's focus on the
r
e
d
circles. Using Descartes circle's theorem we find the 5 first
R
e
d
radii.
R
0
=
4
9
R
1
=
1
9
6
8
1
R
2
=
1
4
8
8
4
7
2
9
R
3
=
1
1
9
6
8
3
6
6
5
6
1
R
4
=
9
6
8
6
4
9
6
4
5
9
0
4
9
We easily see that the numerators are odd power of
9
, then the denominator can be written as
9
n
+
1
The denominator is also an easy challenge, we can rewritte them and spot a pattern: