You may have heard of the arithmetic-geometric mean agm ( x , y ) . Let us define the arithmetic-harmonic mean ahm ( x , y ) as such:
Let x = a 0 and y = h 0 , and define a n + 1 = 2 a n + h n and h n + 1 = a n 1 + h n 1 2 . Then ahm ( x , y ) = n → ∞ lim a n = n → ∞ lim h n .
Evaluate
ahm ( 2 1 , ahm ( 2 4 , ahm ( 2 9 , ahm ( 2 1 6 , … ) ) ) )
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
Did the same! Thanks for the problem! You are great!
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
The arithmetic-harmonic mean converges to the geometric mean. This can be seen by the invariance of the GM after each iteration:
a n h n = a n h n a n + h n a n + h n = a n 1 + h n 1 a n + h n = 2 a n + h n a n 1 + h n 1 2 = a n + 1 h n + 1
So what we're dealing with is the nested radical
2 1 2 4 2 9 … = 2 1 2 / 2 1 ⋅ 2 2 2 / 2 2 ⋅ 2 3 2 / 2 3 ⋅ …
Taking log base 2 gives us the infinite sum
n = 1 ∑ ∞ 2 n n 2
It is well-known that n = 1 ∑ ∞ x n = 1 − x x for all ∣ x ∣ < 1 . Differentiating both sides and multiplying by x gives us the identity n = 1 ∑ ∞ n x n = ( 1 − x ) 2 x . Again differentiating and multiplying x gives us n = 1 ∑ ∞ n 2 x n = ( 1 − x ) 3 x ( 1 + x ) .
Since x = 2 1 satisfies that ∣ x ∣ < 1 , we can use the above identity to evaluate our infinite series:
n = 1 ∑ ∞ 2 n n 2 = ( 1 − 2 1 ) 3 2 1 ( 1 + 2 1 ) = 6
Hence, the nested radical turns out to be 2 6 = 6 4 . Hurrah!