I ( a ) = ∫ − ∞ ∞ 1 + x 4 cos ( a x 2 ) − sin ( a x 2 ) d x
For a ≥ 0 , integral I ( a ) is defined as above. Given that ∫ − ∞ ∞ 1 + x 4 1 d x = 2 π , find 1 0 5 I ( 7 ) .
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
I randomly was pressing buttons and I got it!
I get answer as I ( a ) = 2 π ( cosh ( a ) − sinh ( a ) )
Using contour integration taking a semicircular contour.
and that is equal to 2 π e − a .
@Mark Hennings Yeah. I know it can be simplified further, but at the time of posting the answer, I didn't care to look much. Sorry... :-)
You know what, I used Feynman's Trick to solve this and i ended up with two options, Either y = 2 π e − x or y = 2 π e x
I used both and got the answer in the first expression. I dont know how to solve by this method so that i get only the req. answer.
So When i differentiated it I ( a ) twice, I got I ( a ) = I ′ ′ ( a ) .
So this left me with multiple options like k s i n ( a ) or k e a or k e − a
Last one worked .. I inserted a=0 to get k.
I know my method is poor :P
Assuming [ ( x ∣ a ) ∈ R ∧ a ≥ 0 , ∫ − ∞ ∞ x 4 + 1 cos ( a x 2 ) − sin ( a x 2 ) d x ⟹ 2 π e − a
The site's L A T E X processor was not working at that time. I suggest that you learn to read L A T E X . Also, I needed to go to two doctors' appointments.
But I know Latex sir. Just that it was difficult for me to figure out and understand simultaneously at d same time
@Md Zuhair See the last paragraph of Mark Henning's solution.........
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
Integrate z 4 + 1 e i a z 2 around the quadrant contour made up of the four parts:
γ 1 , the line segment from ε to R , where 0 < ε < 1 < R ,
γ 2 , the quadrant of a circle z = R e i θ for 0 ≤ θ ≤ 2 1 π ,
γ 3 , the line segment from ε i to R i ,
γ 4 , the quadrant of a circle z = ε e i θ for 0 ≤ θ ≤ 2 1 π .
Then ( ∫ γ 1 + ∫ γ 2 − ∫ γ 3 − ∫ γ 4 ) z 4 + 1 e i a z 2 d z = 2 π i R e s z = 2 1 + i z 4 + 1 e i a z 2 = 2 π i 4 ( 2 1 + i ) 3 e − a = 2 2 1 π e − a ( 1 − i ) Now ( ∫ γ 1 − ∫ γ 3 ) z 4 + 1 e i a z 2 d z = ∫ ε R x 4 + 1 e i a x 2 − i e − i a x 2 d x while ∣ ∣ ∣ ∣ ∣ ∫ γ 2 z 4 + 1 e i a z 2 d z ∣ ∣ ∣ ∣ ∣ ∣ ∣ ∣ ∣ ∣ ∫ γ 4 z 4 + 1 e i a z 2 d z ∣ ∣ ∣ ∣ ∣ ≤ ∫ 0 2 1 π R 4 − 1 e − a R 2 sin 2 θ R d θ ≤ 2 ( R 4 − 1 ) π R ≤ ∫ 0 2 1 π 1 − ε 4 e − a ε 2 sin 2 θ ε d θ ≤ 2 ( 1 − ε 4 ) π ε and hence both of these integrals tend to 0 as R → ∞ and ε → 0 respectively. Thus we deduce that ∫ 0 ∞ x 4 + 1 e i a x 2 − i e − i a x 2 d x = 2 2 1 π e − a ( 1 − i ) Taking the real part of this equation gives ∫ 0 ∞ x 4 + 1 cos ( a x 2 ) − sin ( a x 2 ) d x = 2 2 1 π e − a and doubling this gives I ( a ) = 2 1 π e − a provided always that a ≥ 0 . Thus 1 0 5 I ( 7 ) = 2 e 7 1 0 5 π = 2 0 2 . 5 6 9 2 4 1 3
We need to perform the calculation this way. Any attempt to differentiate under the integral sign, obtaining the differential equation I ′ ′ ( a ) = I ( a ) and so deducing that I ( a ) = I ( 0 ) e − a , is going to be difficult to achieve, since validity of the likely "formula" for the second derivative I ′ ′ ( a ) = − ∫ R x 4 + 1 x 4 ( cos ( a x 2 ) − sin ( a x 2 ) ) d x is dependent on interchanging the order of limits (differentiation with respect to a and integration with respect to x ) where the x integrals are at best conditionally convergent.