For a > 0 , let I ( a ) = ∫ 0 a ( 4 − 2 x 2 ) d x .
Which of the following is a sufficient condition for d a d I = 0 ?
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
I present a geometrical and intuitive approach.
This shows a sketch of the graph. As we progress along the x -axis from 0 in the positive direction, I is increasing because we are taking a greater area above the x axis into account in the integral. However, when we reach a zero of the function, the contribution of the area to the integral becomes negative and hence I begins to decrease.
Therefore, there is a local maximum where 4 − 2 a 2 = 0 ⟺ 2 a 2 = 4 ⟸ a = 2 .
If anyone has a different solution that does not require this kind of explanation with area accumulation, I would be interested to hear it.
Log in to reply
I may be missing a subtlety here, but don't we have d a d I = 4 − 2 a 2 by definition? (Well, by the fundamental theorem of calculus.)
Log in to reply
Yeah, we do, after thinking about it properly. Whoops.
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
By the fundamental theorem of calculus :
d a d I = 4 − 2 a 2 4 = 2 a 2 2 = a 2 a = ± 2
We can also show this in the usual way of solving a definite integral:
f ( x ) = 4 − 2 x 2 I ( a ) = ∫ 0 a f ( x ) d x = F ( a ) − F ( 0 )
where F ( x ) is an antiderivative of f ( x ) , i.e. F ′ ( x ) = f ( x )
d a d I = d a d F ( a ) − d a d F ( 0 ) = f ( a ) − 0 = 4 − 2 a 2