Is It Shapeist To Disallow Triangles?

Probability Level pending

In a round-robin tournament involving n n football teams, each of the n n teams played exactly one game against each of the other teams. Each game may end in a win, loss or draw. It happened that each team won exactly three games and also there were not three teams A A , B B , C C such that A A beat B B , B B beat C C and C C beat A A . For how many values of n n in the set { 4 , 5 , 6 , , 100 } \{4,5,6,\ldots, 100\} is this situation possible?

Image credit: Wikipedia Cmglee


The answer is 91.

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

1 solution

Calvin Lin Staff
May 13, 2014

Represent each team as a vertex of a graph, and trace an arrow from A A to B B , A B A\rightarrow B , if team A A beat team B B in the corresponding game. If the game ended in a draw we do not trace any arrow.

We will use graph theory terminology. Thus, in this problem, each vertex has outdegree 3, and there is no 3-cycle.

Since each vertex has outdegree 3, we can take a vertex A 1 A_1 with indegree at least 3. Suppose that there are arrows from A 2 , A 3 , A 4 A_2, A_3, A_4 to A 1 A_1 , and suppose that there are arrows from A 1 A_1 to A 5 , A 6 , A 7 A_5, A_6, A_7 , then the vertices A 1 , A 2 , A 3 , A 4 , A 5 , A 6 , A 7 A_1, A_2, A_3, A_4, A_5, A_6, A_7 are pairwise distinct.

Since A 5 A 6 A 7 A_5A_6A_7 is not a directed 3-cycle we note that one of A 5 , A 6 , A 7 A_5, A_6, A_7 didn't beat the two other teams. W.l.o.g suppose that A 5 A_5 didn't beat A 6 A_6 and A 5 A_5 didn't beat A 7 A_7 . Since A 5 A_5 won exactly three times, there are teams A 8 , A 9 , A 10 A_8, A_9, A_{10} who were beaten by A 5 A_5 .

It is clear that sets { A 8 , A 9 , A 10 } \{A_8, A_9, A_{10}\} and { A 1 , A 5 , A 6 , A 7 } \{A_1, A_5, A_6, A_7\} are disjoint. Now we will prove that { A 8 , A 9 , A 10 } \{A_8, A_9, A_{10}\} and { A 2 , A 3 , A 4 } \{A_2, A_3, A_4\} are disjoint. Suppose, for example, that A 8 = A 2 A_8=A_2 , then we have the 3-cycle A 2 A 1 A 5 A 8 = A 2 A_2\rightarrow A_1\rightarrow A_5\rightarrow A_8=A_2 which is not possible. Therefore the sets { A 8 , A 9 , A 10 } \{A_8, A_9, A_{10}\} and { A 2 , A 3 , A 4 } \{A_2, A_3, A_4\} are disjoint, and this means that there are at least 10 teams, i.e. n 10 n\geq 10 .

Let's construct an example for each n 10 n\geq 10 . Consider a circle with circumference n n and place the vertices A 1 , A 2 , , A n A_1, A_2, \ldots, A_n on that circle such that all the small arcs have length 1. From each A i A_i trace three arrows to the vertices A i + 1 , A i + 2 , A i + 3 A_{i+1}, A_{i+2}, A_{i+3} (indexes are considered module n n ). Suppose that this directed graph has a 3-cycle A i A j A k A i A_i\to A_j \to A_k\to A_i , thus the complete cirumference is divided into three arcs: A i A j , A j A k , A k A i A_iA_j, A_jA_k, A_kA_i , this is a contradiction since the length of the circumference is n 10 n\geq 10 and the length of each arc is 1, 2 or 3.

Therefore, the possible values of n n are { 10 , 11 , 12 , , 100 } \{10,11,12,\ldots, 100\} , thus the answer is 100 10 + 1 = 91 100-10+1=91 .

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...