Divisibility Check

If the number 7448 x 24 y \overline{7448x24y} is divisible by 72 72 , and x y , x \ne y, find x y x-y .


The answer is 7.

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

7 solutions

Shreya R
Dec 23, 2014

We start by looking at the prime factorization of 72 = 2 3 × 3 2 . 72 = 2^{3} \times 3^{2}. It must be that 7448 x 24 y 7448x24y is divisible by both 8 8 and 9 9 to be divisible by 72 72 .

From here, we'll use some divisibility rules to ensure that this number is divisible by 72. In order to be divisible by 8, the number formed by the last three digits needs to be a multiple of 8. For this to happen, we need that y y be either 8 or 0.

For a number to be divisible by 9, the sum of its digits need to be a multiple of 9. When y = 8 y=8 , we have that x = 8 x=8 , which does not satisfy the given conditions. But when y = 0 y=0 , we have that x = 7 x=7 .
Thus, x y = 7 0 = 7 x-y = 7 - 0= 7 .

Wish You a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year

A Former Brilliant Member - 6 years, 5 months ago

Log in to reply

same to you!

Shreya R - 6 years, 5 months ago

How did you guess that x is either 8 or 7

Aman Real - 6 years, 2 months ago

Log in to reply

for the number is divisible by 9, sum of all digit must be divisible by 9. means 7+4+4+8+x+2+4+y (29 + x + y) must be divisible by 9 x+y must equal to 7 or 16 to satisfy the previous condition. the other case, this number is also divisible by 8 so the last 3 digit must be divisible by 8 so y can only be filled by 0 or 8. if we choose 8 to replace y then x will be 8 which is not satisfying the first condition x <> y so y=0 and x=7

Sarono Handoyo - 5 years, 2 months ago

If 72= 6*12, so the number is divisible by both 2 & 3.

7+4+4+8+2+4+x+y =29+ x+y

The next number divisible by 6 is 36. So x + y = 7

Why can't x =5 and y= 2?

Alex Rodriguez - 5 months, 3 weeks ago
Rajat Bhagat
Dec 21, 2014

72= 2* 2* 2* 3 * 3

so number should be divisible by 2,8,3,9...

sum of digits=29+x+y

digit at ones place should be even.And at the same time sum should be divisible by 9.

so y=0 and x=7

So x y = 7. x-y = 7.

Emmanuel Torres
Feb 9, 2017

The number must be divisible by 8 and 9. The last 3 digits must be divisible by 8, so y = 0 or 8. If you add up the digits so far, you have 29. The sum has to be divisible by a multiple of 9. If you assume a number for y, there is always a number you can input for x so that the whole number is divisible by 9. Assuming y = 0, you know x will not equal 0, because then you still have 29, which is not divisible by 9, so y =0 has to work. So x = 7, y = 0. 7 - 0 = 7.

Prove 7∣2222|

Hareesh Gurram - 3 years, 10 months ago

the number 7448x24y is divisible by 72..hence it must be divisible by both 9 and 8.. for a number to be divisible: by 9- the sum of its digits should be a multiple of 9. by 8- the last 3 digits should be a multiple of 8.

Starting with 8: 24y is a multiple of 8.(this is not 24*y). thus y can be 0 or 8..as both are the only multiples of 8 that have their hundreds and tens digits as 2 and 4... (the nos are 240 and 248)

div by 9:

case 1: with y=0 by adding the digits of the original number we get.. 29+x is a multiple of 9. therefore x=7.. as (29+7=36) is a multiple of 9.

case 2: with y=8, again by adding the digits we get x+37 is a multiple of 9. therefore x=8..as 45 is a multiple of 9. but x is not equal to y...that is when y=8, x=8 which is false acc to question.

x=7,y=0; x-y=7-0=7

Final ans:7

K T
Mar 11, 2019

74480240 + 1000 x + y 0 ( m o d 72 ) 74480240+1000x+y \equiv 0 \pmod {72} . Take away multiples of 72

56 + 64 x + y 0 ( m o d 72 ) 56+64x+y \equiv 0 \pmod {72}

y must be a multiple of 8, (because all other terms and the modulus are) so either is y=0 or y=8.

First try y=0:

56 + 64 x 0 ( m o d 72 ) 56+64x\equiv 0 \pmod {72} . Divide by 8:

7 + 8 x 0 ( m o d 9 ) 7+8x \equiv 0 \pmod {9} . Take away 9x

7 x 0 ( m o d 9 ) 7-x \equiv 0 \pmod {9}

x = 7 x=7

Next try y=8:

56 + 64 x + 8 0 ( m o d 72 ) 56+64x+8 \equiv 0 \pmod {72} . Divide by 8:

8 + 8 x 0 ( m o d 9 ) 8+8x \equiv 0 \pmod {9} . Take away 9x

8 x 0 ( m o d 9 ) 8-x \equiv 0 \pmod {9}

x = 8 x=8

But here x=y, so we exclude this answer

x y = 7 0 = 7 x-y=7-0=\boxed{7}

Kane Cardwell
May 12, 2018

I kinda brute forced it. Took me about 20 minutes. ughh, and I know no-one will read this but I want to post what I did anyway.

So what I did was I put 1,2,3etc in for x and then I already knew 74480000 mod 72 was 32, so I carried the 32 as 32 is obviously not divisible by 72 and I just wrote down 32x. Then I input values for x, so for example 1, so 321. So 321 gives a remainder of 33 then I wrote down 33 too. Now carrying 33 to the next digit the process carries on to 334 which gives a remainder of 42 but then theres clearly no value that fits onto 42 to become divisble to 72 because the nearest multiple is 432. and I can't make y 12. So I carry on this time with x=2, it was actually not as tedious as it sounds because now I can replace my 321 with 322 and I know the next will be 34 because im just adding 1, so carrying it to the next digit you get 344 etc etc

Anyway yeah it took a while but I'm not unhappy about not doing it through prime factors.

Justin Ruaya
Feb 16, 2016

For a number to be divisible by a composite number, it should be divisible by ALL its factors. For this problem, a number should be divisible by 72 if it is divisible by BOTH 8 and 9. Y is quite easy. Just take the last 3 digits and think of a number that would be divisible by 8. 240 looks divisible by 8 (quotient: 30). Y=0. Next, for a number to be divisible by 9, ALL digits should sum up to a multiple of 9. If we add all the digits, excluding the variables, we get 29. The closest multiple of 9 from 29 is 36 and is the ONLY multiple whose difference between 36 and 29 is a one digit number. Hence, subtracting 36 from 29 we get 7. So x=7 We're looking for x-y. Substituting the values: 7+0=7 The answer is 7

A suggestion for future puzzles like this, some of us never learned that a line over the digits mean that it is a number . You might add a note to these puzzles reminding us that you're looking for digits . I tried to solve this puzzle algebraically. The only usage I learned for the line over the numbers was for a repeating decimal , which this obviously did not stand for. By the way , how does a person type a line over a number on various pages such as these, Facebook, Quora, etc.

John Williamson - 4 years, 9 months ago

Bro ur food

Pranav Jayaprakasan UT - 4 years, 9 months ago

Sorry i told ur good

Pranav Jayaprakasan UT - 4 years, 9 months ago

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...