This Strange Arithmetic Sequence Problem

Arithmetic sequences a n a_n and b n b_n have integer terms with a 1 = b 1 = 1 < a 2 b 2 a_1=b_1=1<a_2 \leq b_2 and a n b n = 2010 a_n b_n=2010 for some n n . What is the largest possible value of n n ?


The answer is 8.

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

2 solutions

Pranshu Gaba
Apr 8, 2014

Let the common difference of sequences a n a_n and b n b_n be d a d_a and d b d_b respectively. We know d a d_a and d b d_b are integers greater than 1 1 . We want to maximise n n .

We can write sequence a n a_n as a n = a 1 + d a ( n 1 ) a_n = a_1 + d_a(n-1) . However, a 1 = 1 a_1 = 1 , therefore a n = 1 + d a ( n 1 ) a_n = 1 + d_a(n-1)

Similarly, b n = 1 + d b ( n 1 ) b_n = 1 + d_b(n-1) .

Note that gcd ( a n 1 , b n 1 ) = n 1 \gcd(a_n -1, b_n - 1 )= n-1 , if gcd ( d a , d b ) = 1 , \gcd(d_a, d_b) = 1, . Therefore, to maximise n 1 n-1 we must maximise the gcd ( a n 1 , b n 1 ) \gcd(a_n -1, b_n - 1) . gcd ( d a , d b ) \gcd(d_a, d_b) must be 1 1 , otherwise n 1 n -1 wouldn't reach its maximum value.


It is given a n b n = 2010 a_nb_n = 2010 . We get the following unordered pairs of { a n , b n } \{a_n, b_n\} possible.

{ 2010 , 1 } , { 1005 , 2 } , { 670 , 3 } , { 402 , 5 } , { 335 , 6 } , { 201 , 10 } , { 134 , 15 } , { 67 , 30 } \{2010, 1\}, \{1005, 2\}, \{670, 3\}, \{402, 5\}, \{335, 6\}, \{201, 10\}, \{134, 15\}, \{67, 30\}

From these, we can get the following unordered pairs of { a n 1 , b n 1 } \{a_n -1, b_n -1\}

{ 2009 , 0 } , { 1004 , 1 } , { 669 , 2 } , { 401 , 4 } , { 334 , 5 } , { 200 , 9 } , { 133 , 14 } , { 66 , 29 } \{2009, 0\}, \{1004, 1\}, \{669, 2\}, \{401, 4\}, \{334, 5\}, \{200, 9\}, \{133, 14\}, \{66, 29\}

The highest gcd \gcd is of the pair { 133 , 14 } \{133, 14\} , i.e. 7 7 .

Therefore n 1 = 7 n-1 = 7

We get n = 8 \boxed{n = 8}


We can verify this by back substitution. If a n = 134 , b n = 15 a_n = 134, b_n = 15 (or vice-versa), for n = 8 n= 8 , we get d a = 19 , d b = 2 d_a = 19, d_b = 2 .

We get a n = 19 n 18 a_n = 19 n - 18 and b n = 2 n 1 b_n = 2n - 1 .

From these equations, we do get a 1 = 1 , b 1 = 1 , a_1 =1, b_1 = 1, a 8 b 8 = 2010 , a_8b_8 = 2010, and gcd ( 19 , 2 ) = 1 \gcd(19, 2) = 1 , therefore n = 8 \boxed{n=8} is the correct answer.

Awesome job! :D

Finn Hulse - 7 years, 2 months ago
Madhavan Daksh
Apr 22, 2014

Given a1 = b1 = 1 let d1 & d2 be the respective common differences we know that d1 and d2 are positive integers

Now, an*bn = 2010

=> [1+(n-1)d1]*[1+(n-1)d2] = 2010

=> (n-1)[d1+d2+(n-1)d1d2] = 2009

the only possibility would be when n-1 = 7

Hence n = 8

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...