What is the smallest integer that is greater than ( 1 + 0 . 0 0 0 1 ) 1 0 0 0 ?
Note: please don't use calculators, there are better ways to do this.
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
this rule not satify all problem.
We know that ( 1 + 1 0 − 4 ) 1 0 4 ≈ e , so ( 1 + 0 . 0 0 0 1 ) 1 0 0 0 ≈ e 0 . 1 . Since e is slightly less than 3, e must be less than 2 already; e 0 . 1 is even smaller, and obviously greater than 1, so the answer is 2.
Suppose that you don't have a calculator to hand. We must create a range for the value given. Firstly we will expand the bracket, using the Binomial Theorem (note that 0.0001 = 1 0 4 1 ): ( 1 + 0 . 0 0 0 1 ) 1 0 0 0 = 1 + ( 1 1 0 0 0 ) . 1 0 4 1 + ( 2 1 0 0 0 ) . 1 0 8 1 +...+ 1 0 4 0 0 0 1 . Now this is m o r e t h a n 1 + 1 0 4 1 + 1 0 8 1 +... = i = 0 ∑ ∞ 1 0 4 1 = 9 9 9 9 1 0 0 0 0 . It is also l e s s t h a n : i = 0 ∑ ∞ 1 0 i 1 = 9 1 0 . In other words: 9 9 9 9 1 0 0 0 0 < ( 1 + 0 . 0 0 0 1 ) 1 0 0 0 < 9 1 0 , so the next integer is 2 .
1 to the power nearly anything is 1. So is any number closing in around 1. 1+0.0001 gives you 1.0001^1000. Which would be around 1.00000000000000000000.........00011. The integer after this number is 2.
This is not true, a simple counterexample is: 1 . 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 which is already larger than 2 0 0 0 0 . That fallacy that you made is that the small gradual increase of a number x percentage wise cannot never exceed x + 1 .
That actually isn't true Any number bigger than 1 raised to a high enough power eventually grows to infinity. For example 1.0001^1000 is around 1.15
f(x+∆x)=f(x)+f'(x)*∆x when ∆x->0. Taking f(x)=x^1000 and ∆x=0.0001 we get f(1.0001)=1.1 .Thus the answer is 2.
System.out.println ( Math.ceil (Math.pow (1.0001,1000) ) ) ;
I used this computer program in java, just one small line does the work, no need for binomial approximation or range calculation needed.
Try not to use the help of computational assistance when one isn't required.
Using the basics of the binomial theorem, we can see that the expression (1 + 0.0001)^1000 will be equal to:
(1^1000 * 0.0001^0) + (1^999 * 0.0001^1) + (1^998 * 0.0001^2) ... + (1^0 * 0.0001^1000)
The first term of each expression is simply 1, so we can "factor out" the 1 to make the new expression:
1(0.0001^0 + 0.0001^1 + 0.0001^2 + ... + 0.0001^1000)
We can easily see that besides the first number 0.0001^0, which is 1, the rest of the numbers will be extremely small approaching closer and closer to 0. Thus, the rest of the numbers are irrelevent except in showing us that they sum to be a number slightly greater than 0 but definitely less than 1.
1(1 + very small number) = 1.0001 with the 0001 repeating. The smallest positive integer greater than that expression is simply 2.
Your solution is marked wrong for obvious reasons. ( 1 + a ) b = 1 + a b is not an algebraic identity. Furthermore, you should mention you're using binomial approximation and you must specify the error term.
By binomial approximation- (1+x)^n=1+nx, when |x|<1. so, (1+0.0001)^1000 =1+(1000)(0.0001) =1.1 Therefore the required solution is 2.
It should be ( 1 + x ) n ≈ 1 + n x .
An easy way to think of this is to compare it to what happens if you multiply a number, say 1, by 1.01. It becomes 1.01 - or increases by 10%. In this case, we are multiplying 1 by 1.0001 (a 0.1% increase) 1000 times (if you count adding 0.0001 to 1 as being equivalent, which it is)... if you apply a 0.1% increase 1000 times you end up with a 100% increase. The number which is 100% greater than 1 is 2.
Your use of percentage is wrong. "In this case, we are multiplying 1 by 1.0001 (a 0.1% increase)", it should be a 0.01% increase. And your logic is wrong. If you increase 1 by 0 . 0 1 % for a thousand times, you won't get exactly 2 as the answer. What you're implying is that 1 . 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 = 2 or ( 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 ) 1 0 0 0 = 2 , multiplying both sides by 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 shows an odd number equals to an even number which is a contradiction.
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
By using the Binomial Approximation , we know:
( 1 + b ) n ≈ 1 + n b , then:
( 1 + 0 . 0 0 0 1 ) 1 0 0 0 ≈ 1 + 0 . 0 0 0 1 × 1 0 0 0 = 1 . 1 < 2