Domino covering

Alex wants to cover a 30 by 30 board perfectly with 450 1 by 2 dominos. He also wants to ensure that he can trace a path between any 2 dominos that connect through at most N N dominos. What is the minimum possible value of N N which would allow Alex to form such a configuration?

Details and assumptions

A perfect covering of the board means that each square is covered by exactly 1 domino, and none of the dominos jut out over the board.

N N would be inclusive of both the initial and the final domino.


The answer is 30.

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

6 solutions

Michal Forišek
Jul 31, 2013

Consider the dominos that cover the top left and bottom right corner. Any path that connects them has at least 55 other cells, and therefore it contains at least 55 / 2 = 28 \lceil 55/2\rceil=28 other dominos. Hence N 30 N\geq 30 .

Now, consider the following pattern for a 6 × 6 6\times 6 board:

+---+---+---+---+---+---+
|       |       |       |
+---+---+---+---+---+---+
|       |       |       |
+---+---+---+---+---+---+
|       |       |   |   |
+---+---+---+---+   +   +
|       |       |   |   |
+---+---+---+---+---+---+
|       |   |   |   |   |
+---+---+   +   +   +   +
|       |   |   |   |   |
+---+---+---+---+---+---+

It is easily shown that for this pattern any pair of dominos can be connected by a path that contains at most 6 dominos, including the initial and the final one. (There is always an optimal sequence of cells where we either first go horizontally and then vertically, or vice versa.) This generalizes to any 2 k × 2 k 2k\times 2k board. Thus the smallest possible N N is 30 \fbox{30} .

I find the answer of this problem(30) patently obvious but i can't contruct a configuration satisfying the requirement.Your configuration is very..very nice.thanks a lot Michal F

Hunter Killer - 7 years, 10 months ago

nice

bkjbknbjn jghiugigi - 7 years, 10 months ago

can't you just say that a complete covering will obviously involve 30 by 15 dominoes, and seeing as the diagonal will therefore cover 30 dominoes too, the furthest you will ever have to go is 30 dominoes so that's your answer?

Katie Marsden - 6 years, 4 months ago
Thomas Beuman
Jul 30, 2013

Since a path from one corner to the opposite corner involves at least 59 squares, it involves at least 30 dominoes, so N 30 N \geq 30 . I will prove that N = 30 N=30 is possible, thereby establishing that it is the minimum value.

We will prove by induction that, for a 2 n × 2 n 2n \times 2n board, it is possible to have N = 2 n N=2n . For n = 1 n=1 , it is trivially true. Now we prove that it holds for a 2 n × 2 n 2n \times 2n board, assuming that it holds for a 2 ( n 1 ) × 2 ( n 1 ) 2(n-1) \times 2(n-1) board.

Cover the rim of the board. The rest of the board is effectively a 2 ( n 1 ) × 2 ( n 1 ) 2(n-1) \times 2(n-1) board; we cover it in accordance with the induction assumption.

Consider any two dominoes. From both dominoes, it takes at most 1 1 domino to get to a domino that's not on the rim. By induction, there is a path of at most 2 ( n 1 ) 2(n-1) dominoes between those two dominoes. Therefore, the whole path consists of at most 2 n 2n dominoes. Therefore, we have N = 2 n N=2n for this configuration. This concludes the proof.

Daniel Chiu
Jul 30, 2013

First, we count the shortest number of dominoes from the top-left to the bottom-right domino. To get to the bottom-right, you must go down 29 squares, and over 29 squares. Including the top-left square, this is 59 squares, and that is at least 30 dominoes, so N is at least 30.

We will now show that N=30 is minimal. Consider a configuration where the first and last columns have only vertical dominoes, and every other domino is horizontal. The shortest path from the top-left to the bottom-right domino connects 30 dominoes, 15 vertical, 14 horizontal, and then 1 vertical. Now, it remains to be shown that every pair of dominoes can be connected by a path of at most 30 dominoes. If both dominoes are vertical, and on the same side, the maximum path length is 15. If they are both vertical and on opposite sides, the path must consist of 14 horizontal dominoes, and a maximum of 16 vertical, if they are opposite corners. If they are both horizontal, then a shortest path will consist of a maximum of 15 horizontal dominoes and 15 vertical dominoes, since a path can be created by going to one of the left and right columns, going to the appropriate row, and going across. There cannot be more that 15 horizontal dominoes in such a path, because going one column and down, to the goal domino, to the other column and up, and back goes through 28 horizontal dominoes, so the lesser of the paths must be at most 15 horizontal dominoes, including the start domino.

Therefore, the answer is 30.

Douglas Zare
Jul 30, 2013

If a path of N dominoes covers two squares, those squares are of distance at most 2N-1 in the taxicab metric. The opposite corners are distance 58 apart, so no path of length less than 30 can connect dominoes covering opposite corners.

We'll show 30 is achievable by construction. Construct a horizontal brick-pattern triangle whose base is 15 horizontal dominoes along the bottom of the board, with 14 dominoes above it, then 13, etc. up to 1 horizontal domino. The center of the board is on the top edge of the top domino. Reflect this to make another triangle of horizontal dominoes from the top side of the board to the center of the board. The gaps to the left and right can be tiled by dominoes in precisely one way, with triangles of vertical dominoes in a brick pattern with 14 vertical dominoes along the left and right sides, not including the corner squares which are covered by horizontal dominoes. Equivalently, we cover a 2x2 board by horizontal dominoes, than then tile concentric 2nx2n boards to include the previous tilings plus n dominoes along the bottom, n dominoes along the top, n-1 dominoes along the left side, and n-1 dominoes along the right side.

In this tiling, any domino can be connected to one of the central dominoes by a path of length at most 15, and the central dominoes are adjacent. So, any two dominoes can be connected by taking the union of those paths to the central dominoes, which has length at most 30.

If a path of N dominoes covers two squares, those squares are of distance at most 2N-1 in the taxicab metric. The opposite corners are distance 58 apart, so no path of length less than 30 can connect dominoes covering opposite corners.

That's fine if we assume that the path only goes horizontally and vertically.

Peter Byers - 7 years, 10 months ago

@Peter B.: That's what taxicab distance means: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taxicab_geometry

Raoul Nicolodi - 7 years, 10 months ago

Log in to reply

@Peter B.: That's what taxicab distance means

That's certainly true, but it doesn't aid the proof.

Peter Byers - 7 years, 10 months ago

@Douglas Z: Sorry for the confusion. My second post ("That's certainly true, but it doesn't aid the proof.") was intended as a response to Raoul N's post.

My first post ("That's fine if we assume that the path only goes horizontally and vertically.") was the one intended for you. Essentially what I was wondering is: what if the path goes from one domino to another domino that is only touching at the corners?

Peter Byers - 7 years, 10 months ago

Log in to reply

That's not normally what is meant by adjacent or connected on a lattice. With that odd interpretation it is a different problem with a different answer. What did you expect?

I'm not going to bother writing up more solutions since this is the level of feedback I'm getting. You show no appreciation for the time and effort I put into correctly explaining the solution, and instead nitpick in a confused matter about something that was fine, and was in fact clearer in my proof than in other answers.

Douglas Zare - 7 years, 10 months ago

@anyone: I guess Douglas Z isn't interested in this question, so I'll open it up for anyone else (whether you posted a solution or not) who might wish to share their reasoning. (Douglas Z, I apologize for putting the question under your solution. I definitely would have put it somewhere else if I had known how you would react to it.)

Peter Byers - 7 years, 10 months ago

Log in to reply

Please do not attach this to my correct and informative solution to the actual problem. That you apparently wanted the problem to say something else should not be used to criticize or disparage my efforts. I do not appreciate comments like "it doesn't aid the proof." Seriously, what were you thinking? Would you like it if you had gone through the trouble of reviewing the proof of a rejected answer, then paying to dispute the original problem, writing up the proof in the dispute, then writing the first solution to the problem using more detail than the other solutions, only to get an unfair comment, "it doesn't aid the proof?" This makes it look like my efforts to help others to understand this problem are somehow substandard. So, I won't bother writing up anything else. I'm a mathematician. If my proofs don't live up to your standards, this is because your standards are wrong, and since you don't appreciate my efforts I won't bother next time.

Douglas Zare - 7 years, 10 months ago

Make a 8 8 square in your notebook. Observe that if you want to reach from one corner to another, then diagonal offers the shortest path and there exist a covering such that each square on diagonal is covered with a different domino. Hence, at least minimum value of N in this case is 8. Similarly for 30 30, value of N will be 30.

The worst case happens when we want to trace a path from a domino from one corner to the opposite corner (from the lower left to the upper right, for instance).

Since each domino is 1x2, by moving only towards our goal (the ending domino) we advance 2 grids in the board. Moreover, since the board is 30x30 we gotta walk 30 times horizontally and 30 times vertically in the worst case, so we have to walk 60 grids taking 2 grids per step. Total is 60/2 = 30 steps (dominoes).

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...