If a , b , c , d are positive real numbers satisfying a b c d = 1 , then find the minimum value of ( 1 + a ) ( 1 + b ) ( 1 + c ) ( 1 + d ) .
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
Yes! This is the intended solution.
Note that we can use AM - GM Inequality since it is explicitly given that a , b , c , and d are positive reals. Expanding ( 1 + a ) ( 1 + b ) ( 1 + c ) ( 1 + d ) gives
1 4 − [ − ( a + b + c + d ) ] × 1 3 + ( a b + a c + a d + b c + b d + c d ) × 1 2 − [ − ( a b c + a b d + a c d + b c d ) ] × 1 + a b c d ( From Vieta's Identities )
or
1 + a + b + c + d + a b + a c + a d + b c + b d + c d + a b c + a b d + a c d + a b d + a b c d
We can now use the AM - GM Inequality to find the minimum value of the above expression. Thus,
1 6 1 + a + b + c + d + a b + a c + a d + b c + b d + c d + a b c + a b d + a c d + b c d + a b c d ≥ 1 6 ( 1 × a × b × c × d × a b × a c × a d × b c × b d × c d × a b c × a b d × a c d × b c d × a b c d ) = 1 6 ( a b c d ) 8 = 1 6 1 8 = 1
Moreover, we get
1 + a + b + c + d + a b + a c + a d + b c + b d + c d + a b c + a b d + b c d + a b c d ≥ 1 6 × 1 = 1 6
Hence, the minimum value is 1 6 which is then obtained when 1 = a = b = c = d = a b = a c = a d = b c = b d = c d = a b c = a b d = a c d = b c d = a b c d . From here, it follows that a = b = c = d = 1 .
Note: I'm sorry for the tedious solution. I just wanted to be clear that's why I wrote it that way.
suppose a=b=c=d=1 and u can get the answer :)
How do you know that it achieved a minimum value at a = b = c = d = 1 ?
An intuitive exploration:
First, let's limit our exploration to just a and b.
In order for ab = 1, a and b must be reciprocals.
if a = 1, then b = 1
So (1+1)(1+1) = 2 * 2 = 4
if a = 2 then b = 1/2
So (1+2)(1+1/2) = 9/2 = 4.5
If a = 3 then b = 1/3
So (1+3)(1+1/3) = 16/3 = 5.33333...
As we use smaller fractions, the reciprocals are inversely larger, and the products of the sum of each with 1 are also larger, so using 1 for all of the variables gives the minimum product.
(1+1)(1+1)(1+1)(1+1) = 2 * 2 * 2 * 2 = 16
You have only checked for small samples, how can you conclude that it becomes larger in value based on those few observation? And why must a b = c d = 1 ?, why can't we have a b c = d = 1 or others? And can you solve this problem without applying calculus?
minimize
(1+a)(1+b)
when ab = 1
b = 1/a = a^-1
(1 + a)(1 + a^-1)
1 + a^-1 + a + 1
a + a^-1 + 2
First derivative of a + a^-1 + 2 = 1 + -1a^-2
This function has a relative min/max when
1 + -1a^-2 = 0
-1a^-2 = -1
a^-2 = 1
(a^-2)^(-1/2) = 1^(-1/2)
a = +1 or -1
a must be positive
There is a relative min/max at a = 1
At a = 2
1 + -1(2)^-2
1+-0.25 = 0.75
Positive slope - increasing
a = 1 is a relative minimum
The minimum point (a,b,c,d) that minimaze f(a,b,c,d)=(1+a)(1+b)(1+c)(1+d) under the constraint abcd=1 also minimaze ln[f(a,b,c,d)] under the same constraint. let H(a,b,c,d)=ln[f(a,b,c,d)] and also we have g(a,b,c,d)=abcd=1 now using lagrange multiplier, that is "Gradient(H(a,b,c,d))=λ Gradient(g(a,b,c,d)) and we get that λ =a/(1+a) , λ =b/(1+b) , λ =c/(1+c) and λ =d/(1+d) Which implies a=b=c=d but because abcd=1 hence a=b=c=d=1 therefore min[f]=f(1,1,1,1)=16
Can you solve this without Lagrange Multiplier?
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
We' re going to apply AM>=GM inequality: a+1>=2sqrt(a); b+1>=2sqrt(b); c+1>=2sqrt(c); d+1>=2sqrt(d); (a+1)(b+1)(c+1)(d+1)>=16sqrt(abcd); (a+1)(b+1)(c+1)(d+1)>=16sqrt(1); (a+1)(b+1)(c+1)(d+1)>=16(1), we get the minimum value when
(a+1)(b+1)(c+1)(d+1)=16