Don't shoot the animal, hunter!

A sportsman's chance of shooting an animal at a distance R ( > A ) R(>A) is A 2 R 2 . \frac{A^{2}}{R^{2}}. He fires when R = 2 A R=2A and if he misses, he reloads and fires when R = 3 A , 4 A , 5 A R=3A,4A,5A\cdots and so on. If he misses at distance 1729 A , 1729A, the animals escapes.

If the probability that the animal escapes is a b \frac{a}{b} where a a and b b are coprime integers, what is the value of b a ? b-a?

You can try my other Probability problems by clicking here


The answer is 864.

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

2 solutions

The animal escapes if the hunter misses at every distance from 2 A 2A to 1729 A 1729A . The probability that this happens is

n = 2 1729 ( 1 A 2 ( n A ) 2 ) = n = 2 1729 ( 1 1 n 2 ) = n = 2 1729 ( n 1 ) ( n + 1 ) n n \displaystyle\prod_{n=2}^{1729} (1 - \frac{A^{2}}{(nA)^{2}}) = \displaystyle\prod_{n=2}^{1729} (1 - \frac{1}{n^{2}}) = \displaystyle\prod_{n=2}^{1729} \frac{(n - 1)(n + 1)}{n*n} .

Now this a telescoping product, since if we write all the successive terms in this fashion we end up canceling all the middle terms and end up with an answer of just

( 1 2 ) ( 1730 1729 ) = 865 1729 (\dfrac{1}{2})(\dfrac{1730}{1729}) = \dfrac{865}{1729} .

This means that a = 865 , b = 1729 a = 865, b = 1729 and b a = 864 b - a = \boxed{864} .

(To demonstrate how the telescoping works, I'll write out the product from n = 2 n = 2 to n = 5 n = 5 :

( 1 3 2 2 ) ( 2 4 3 3 ) ( 3 5 4 4 ) ( 4 6 5 5 ) = ( 1 2 ) ( 6 5 ) (\dfrac{1*3}{2*2})(\dfrac{2*4}{3*3})(\dfrac{3*5}{4*4})(\dfrac{4*6}{5*5}) = (\dfrac{1}{2})(\dfrac{6}{5}) .)

That's The Cool Problem ... Thumbs up For Problem Setter..!!

Karan Shekhawat - 6 years, 8 months ago

Log in to reply

i agree , this problem is good

math man - 6 years, 8 months ago

Absolutely ! its the smart way. :)

Sandeep Bhardwaj - 6 years, 8 months ago

Log in to reply

Thanks. I like how you brought the Hardy-Ramanujan number into the question. :) It's interesting that even if the hunter keeps shooting at successively greater distances forever the probability that the animal escapes never goes below 50%, and only approaches this value in the limit.

Brian Charlesworth - 6 years, 8 months ago

Log in to reply

I love 1729, that's why I try to bring it everywhere. You know my email id is "sandeepmathematics1729@gmail.com" .

Sandeep Bhardwaj - 6 years, 8 months ago

Why is the problem tagged with #IITJEE?

Agnishom Chattopadhyay - 6 years, 8 months ago

Log in to reply

Because it will be helpful for those who are preparing for entrance into IIT or any other engineering college. Is there something wrong with it ?

Sandeep Bhardwaj - 6 years, 8 months ago

I didn't get it directly in the way you've got it, but I got it like this too -

(4-1)(9-1)(16-1)....(1729^2)/4x9x16x25...x1729^2

Using (a+b)(a-b) = a^2 - b^2, we can simplify the numerator, getting 1730/(1729*2)

Ayan Jain - 6 years, 3 months ago

Exactly Same Way.

Kushagra Sahni - 5 years, 5 months ago

I got the same expression but i am confused of solving the telescoping series. Getting a few terms extra. please help. Thanks :)

neelesh vij - 5 years, 4 months ago

Log in to reply

Expanding the product out four terms from n = 2 n = 2 to n = 5 n = 5 gives us

1 3 2 2 × 2 4 3 3 × 3 5 4 4 × 4 6 5 5 = 1 2 × 6 5 \dfrac{1*3}{2*2} \times \dfrac{2*4}{3*3} \times \dfrac{3*5}{4*4} \times \dfrac{4*6}{5*5} = \dfrac{1}{2} \times \dfrac{6}{5} ,

since all the factors in the "middle" successively cancel out pairwise. So if we keep expanding the product out to n = 1729 n = 1729 we end up with 1 2 × 1729 + 1 1729 = 1 2 × 1730 1729 \dfrac{1}{2} \times \dfrac{1729 + 1}{1729} = \dfrac{1}{2} \times \dfrac{1730}{1729} .

Brian Charlesworth - 5 years, 4 months ago
Mvs Saketh
Oct 19, 2014

good problem,becomes simple once some one sees it as a telescopic series,, but what would have made this problem really easy was if the hunter had infinite chances to hunt the deer,., in that case ,, the probability would have been (1/2) and the answer 1

Yeah, Even this value tends to 0.5

Md Zuhair - 2 years, 7 months ago

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...