Find the remainder of 2 0 1 4 . 2 0 1 5 . 2 0 1 6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 0 2 3 on division by 1 1 .
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
When asking for remainders, standard notation is to require the smallest non-negative remainder. I have updated the answer to 10.
Log in to reply
but isn't the answer 4? I doubt it is true, by multiplying!
don't know wilson's theorem
Log in to reply
Actually, you can solve it even without using Wilson's theorem. Just evaluate the value of 1 0 ! m o d 1 1 by splitting up 1 0 ! and finding the remainder of each part and then find the remainder at last of the value obtained if it is > 1 0 like this,
1 0 ! = 1 0 × 9 × 8 × 7 … 2 × 1 = 9 0 × 5 6 × 3 0 × 2 4 ⟹ 1 0 ! ( m o d 1 1 ) = ( 9 0 × 5 6 × 3 0 × 2 4 ) ( m o d 1 1 ) ⟹ 1 0 ! ( m o d 1 1 ) ≡ ( 2 × 1 × 8 × 2 ) ( m o d 1 1 ) ⟹ 1 0 ! ( m o d 1 1 ) ≡ 3 2 ( m o d 1 1 ) ≡ 1 0 ( m o d 1 1 ) ⟹ 1 0 ! ( m o d 1 1 ) ≡ 1 0 ( m o d 1 1 )
Overrated!
1 2 3 4 |
|
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
We know that both 2013 and 2024 are both divisible by 11. Thus all the numbers lying in between will have remainder 1, 2,...10.
According to wilson's theorem:
(p-1)!=-1(modp)
,here we have 1.2.3.....9.10.
Therefore,
10! = -1 (mod11)
Both -1 and 10 are correct, but it seems that the solution given is only -1.