Dynamics (3-28-2020)

Two identical particles of mass m m are fixed to the x x and y y axes, respectively, where they can slide without losses. The particles are attached to the ends of a mass-less rigid rod of length L L , and the angle between the rod and the x x axis is θ \theta . A spring of force constant k k and natural length 0 \ell_0 has one end connected to the origin, and the other end connected to the particle on the x x axis. The ambient gravitational acceleration is g g in the y -y direction.

If the system starts from rest with θ = θ 0 \theta = \theta_0 , what is the time period of the system's motion?

Details and Assumptions:
1) m = 1 m = 1
2) L = 2 L = \sqrt{2}
3) k = 95 k = 95
4) 0 = 1 \ell_0 = 1
5) g = 10 g = 10
6) θ 0 = π / 4 \theta_0 = \pi/4


The answer is 2.068.

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

1 solution

Karan Chatrath
Mar 29, 2020

Consider the particle on the x-axis. It's coordinates are:

x 1 = L cos θ x ˙ 1 = L θ ˙ sin θ x_1 = L\cos{\theta} \implies \dot{x}_1 = -L\dot{\theta}\sin{\theta} y 1 = 0 y_1 = 0

Consider the particle on the y-axis. It's coordinates are:

x 2 = 0 x_2 = 0 y 2 = L sin θ y ˙ 2 = L θ ˙ cos θ y_2 = L\sin{\theta} \implies \dot{y}_2 = L\dot{\theta}\cos{\theta}

At any instant of time, the kinetic energy of the whole system of particles is:

T = 1 2 m ( x ˙ 1 2 + y ˙ 1 2 ) + 1 2 m ( x ˙ 2 2 + y ˙ 2 2 ) = θ ˙ 2 T = \frac{1}{2}m\left(\dot{x}_1^2 + \dot{y}_1^2 \right) + \frac{1}{2}m\left(\dot{x}_2^2 + \dot{y}_2^2 \right) = \dot{\theta}^2

At any instant of time, the potential energy of the system is:

V = V g r a v i t a t i o n a l + V s p r i n g V = V_{\mathrm{gravitational}} + V_{\mathrm{spring}} V = m g y 1 + m g y 2 + 1 2 k ( x 1 L o ) 2 V = mgy_1 + mgy_2 + \frac{1}{2}k\left(x_1 - Lo\right)^2 V = 10 2 sin θ + 95 2 ( 2 cos θ 1 ) 2 V = 10\sqrt{2}\sin{\theta} + \frac{95}{2}\left(\sqrt{2}\cos{\theta} - 1\right)^2

Since the total energy of the system is conserved, by applying the law of conservation of energy, one gets:

E = T + V = T i n i t i a l + V i n i t i a l = 10 E = T + V = T_{\mathrm{initial}} + V_{\mathrm{initial}} = 10 E = θ ˙ 2 + 10 2 sin θ + 95 2 ( 2 cos θ 1 ) 2 = 10 E = \dot{\theta}^2 + 10\sqrt{2}\sin{\theta} + \frac{95}{2}\left(\sqrt{2}\cos{\theta} - 1\right)^2=10

The initial potential energy can be computed by plugging in θ = π / 4 \theta= \pi/4 . To obtain the equation of motion (EOM) of this system, all that needs to be done now is:

d E d t = 0 \frac{dE}{dt} = 0

Evaluating the above expression gives the required EOM and numerical integration gives the required answer quite easily. However, I did not take this route. Here is what I tried.


The total energy of the system is conserved. If this system were to undergo periodic motion, the oscillations would take place such that θ \theta oscillates between two extremities. One extreme position is known which is θ = π / 4 \theta= \pi/4 . The question then becomes to find the other extreme position. To do this, one must understand that at the other extreme position, the system would have lost all kinetic energy and would have only potential energy. Since energy is conserved, this value of the extreme potential energy is 10. To find the other extreme position, the potential energy needs to be equated to 10 and θ \theta must be solved for. However, solving a nonlinear equation is not so trivial. So I plotted the potential energy of the system vs. θ \theta as follows and drew the following conclusions:

  • The potential energy reduces as θ \theta reduces from 45 degrees. It obtains a value of 10 10 again at θ m = 19.16 \theta_m = 19.16 degrees.
  • The system oscillates between these two extreme values. It can only oscillate between these two values as if it goes beyond these bounds, the energy in the system would increase which would violate the energy conservation principle.
  • As the particle oscillates between these two extremes, the potential energy gets converted to kinetic energy and back again to potential energy in a periodic way.
  • The particle moves from one extreme to another in half a time period.

Using these insights, the energy equation can be re-arranged as follows:

E = θ ˙ 2 + 10 2 sin θ + 95 2 ( 2 cos θ 1 ) 2 = 10 E = \dot{\theta}^2 + 10\sqrt{2}\sin{\theta} + \frac{95}{2}\left(\sqrt{2}\cos{\theta} - 1\right)^2=10 10 10 2 sin θ 95 2 ( 2 cos θ 1 ) 2 = θ ˙ \sqrt{10 - 10\sqrt{2}\sin{\theta} - \frac{95}{2}\left(\sqrt{2}\cos{\theta} - 1\right)^2} = \dot{\theta}

As time increases, θ \theta decreases which justifies the introduction of a negative sign as such: 10 10 2 sin θ 95 2 ( 2 cos θ 1 ) 2 = θ ˙ \sqrt{10 - 10\sqrt{2}\sin{\theta} - \frac{95}{2}\left(\sqrt{2}\cos{\theta} - 1\right)^2} = -\dot{\theta}

Separating the variables and integrating can give the required expression for the T time period which is:

T 2 = θ m θ o d θ 10 10 2 sin θ 95 2 ( 2 cos θ 1 ) 2 \frac{T}{2} = \int_{\theta_m}^{\theta_o} \frac{d\theta}{\sqrt{10 - 10\sqrt{2}\sin{\theta} - \frac{95}{2}\left(\sqrt{2}\cos{\theta} - 1\right)^2} } T 2.066 \boxed{T \approx 2.066}

The above integral was outsourced to Wolfram. The value of θ m \theta_m was obtained to high precision as the value of the integral is sensitive to it. The answer was verified by regular brute-force numerical integration of the EOM.

@Steven Chase Hope you are well in these strange times. I have been doing some reading and I came across a simple mathematical model that aims to give some insight into this current affair. It is called the SIR model and it is a system of three time-varying ODEs. I think you might find it interesting.

Karan Chatrath - 1 year, 2 months ago

Greetings, and thanks for the solution. Indeed, I am keeping well, as I hope you are too. Pre-determining the bounds on θ \theta is not something that occurred to me initially, but it makes sense in hindsight. Also, I think it is interesting that when you take the d E d t = 0 \frac{dE}{dt} = 0 route, the resulting equation ends up having θ ˙ \dot{\theta} in every term. So the behavior seems undefined when the system is at rest initially. In contrast, the Lagrange approach avoids that. Yeah, that SIR diff eq system looks like it would be fun to play with.

Steven Chase - 1 year, 2 months ago

Log in to reply

I am fine, thank you. And yes, I ignore the θ ˙ \dot{\theta} multiplier altogether. But your point is valid. Lagrangian mechanics avoids this initial singularity. I try to see alternate approaches of dealing with conservative systems as such approaches usually draw attention to interesting features of the dynamical system. LM which is robust takes away that opportunity as it automates the process of solving a mechanics problem.

Karan Chatrath - 1 year, 2 months ago

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...