3 1 + x + 3 1 − x = 3 5
One solution of the above equation is of the form b a , where a and b are coprime positive integers.
Find a + b .
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
3 5 1 + x + 3 5 1 − x = 1
Cubing
5 1 + x + 5 1 − x + 3 × 3 2 5 1 − x = 1
3 × 3 2 5 1 − x = 5 3
2 5 1 − x = 1 2 5 1
x = 5 4
Hey brother, this expression has actually a single root only. Now what's wrong is that your second approach is incorrect due to the wrong algebraic ideidentity you have used. Just recheck it @megh choksi
Log in to reply
Oh yes sorry a big mistake just did orally and when wrote in latex didn't paid much attention . thank you @Sanjeet Raria
Log in to reply
The intriguing thing is that the answer is still correct. The solution is just missing a step during cubing (a+b)^3 = (a^3) + (b^3) + 3ab {a+b}
Where the last {a+b} is :
[3√{(1 + √x) / 5}] + [3√{(1 - √x) / 5}]
And is actually equal to 1.
Because as per the question we have been given already that
{3√(1 + √x)} + {3√(1 - √x)} = 3√(5)
Thus,
[{3√(1 + √x)} + {3√(1 - √x)}] / 3√(5) = 1
Making the identity and solution correct
What has got me in thinking is that why we can't have both the values by the single mehod let's just say by the first one.
we have
3 1 + x + 3 1 − x + 3 − 5 = 0
This should instantly motivate us to use the famous equality:
a 3 + b 3 + c 3 − 3 a b c = ( a + b + c ) ( a 2 + b 2 + c 2 − a b − b c − c a )
and if, a + b + c = 0 ; we have a 3 + b 3 + c 3 = 3 a b c
plugging in a = 3 1 + x ; .. b = 3 1 − x and c = 3 − 5
we have:
1 + x + 1 − x − 5 = 3 3 ( 1 + x ) ( 1 − x ) ( − 5 )
Simplifying,
x = 5 4
So, our answer: 9
@megh choksi .. what do you think? :D
Yes nice , good use of the formula
Log in to reply
First, very nice. Anyway one question. You started with rewriting the problem with the structure a^3+b^3+c^3=0 (let's call this 1) . Then in the solution you said "if a+b+c=0" (let's call this 2), now is (2) is an assumption or can we infer this from (1)?
Just to be sure I tested a random case. a=48, b=20 then c needs to round about "-6488183/132060" . With those values (1) works while (2) does not. So my, maybe naive, question holds, how can we assert (2) in this case?
Same solution hehe
I think the simler method is the standard one in which you cube the equation, may there be some concept which guaranties a more clever approach?
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
Let α = 3 1 + x and β = 3 1 − x . Then:
( α + β ) 3 = 5
α 3 + 3 α 2 β + 3 α β 2 + β 3 = 5
Note that: α 3 + β 3 = 1 + x + 1 − x = 2
Therefore, 2 + 3 α β ( α + β ) = 5 ⇒ 3 α β ( α + β ) = 3 ⇒ α β ( α + β ) = 1
Cubing throughout: α 3 β 3 ( α + β ) 3 = 1 ⇒ ( 1 + x ) ( 1 − x ) ( 5 ) = 1
⇒ 5 ( 1 − x ) = 1 ⇒ 1 − x = 5 1 ⇒ x = 5 4 = b a ⇒ a + b = 9