Easy Equation.

F i n d t h e n u m b e r o f o r d e r e d p a i r s o f s o l u t i o n s w h e r e x , y a r e i n t e g e r s o f t h e f o l l o w i n g e q u a t i o n : 1 x + 1 y = 1 2018 Find\quad the\quad number\quad of\quad ordered\quad pairs\quad of\quad solutions\quad \\ where\quad x,y\quad are\quad integers\quad of\quad the\quad following\quad equation:\\ \\ \quad \quad \quad \quad \frac { 1 }{ x } \quad +\quad \frac { 1 }{ y } \quad =\quad \frac { 1 }{ 2018 }


The answer is 17.

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

1 solution

Mas Mus
Apr 21, 2015

1 x + 1 y = 1 2018 y = 2018 + 201 8 2 x 2018 \begin{array}{c}&\frac{1}{x}+\frac{1}{y}=\frac{1}{2018}\\ \ \large{y=2018+\frac{2018^2}{x-2018}}\end{array}

Since x x and y y are integers, then x 2018 x-2018 should be a divisor of 201 8 2 2018^2 . The divisors of 201 8 2 2018^2 are :

± 1 , ± 2 , ± 4 , ± 1009 , ± 2018 , ± 4036 , ± 100 9 2 , ± 403 6 2 , ± 2036162 \pm1, \pm2,\pm4, \pm1009, \pm2018, \pm4036, \pm1009^2, \pm4036^2, \pm2036162 .

But, x and y 0 ( or x 2018 2018 ) x\text{ and }y\neq0\left(\text{or }x-2018\neq-2018\right) , so we have 2 × 9 1 = 17 2\times{9}-1=\boxed{17} pairs solution.

Nice solution but Simon's Favourite Trick would have been, I'd not say easier necessarily, but faster method to approach the problem. Anyways, now I see a new way to approach these problems. c:

Kunal Verma - 6 years, 1 month ago

Jesus!I wrote the equation the form of ( x p q ) ( y p q ) = p 2 q 2 (x-pq)(y-pq)=p^2q^2 where p , q p,q were 2 , 1009 2,1009 respectively.Now by calculating all possible cases for p 2 q 2 p^2q^2 divisors I got 9 answers for x , y x,y multiplying by 2 to get results for integers I got the answer 18 but now I see where I went wrong ...... RIP 200 points! :((

Arian Tashakkor - 6 years, 1 month ago

Log in to reply

That was the entire catch of the problem.

Kunal Verma - 6 years, 1 month ago

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...