Find the value of constant k for which following limit exists:
x → 3 lim 2 x 2 − 5 x − 3 4 x 2 + k x + 7 k − 6 .
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
Factoring 4x^2-3x-27 = (x-3)(4x+9), not (x-3)(4x+1).
Therefore, the limit would be 2 ( 3 ) + 1 4 ( 3 ) + 9 = 7 2 1 = 3
Log in to reply
I'm not the person writing the solution in Fraction array (guess staff wrote it for the sake of clarity or maybe there's a flaw), but I also noticed the error in the solution and have made changes accordingly.
@Chew-Seong Cheong sir you write x-3 must be a factor isn't 2x+1 be also a factor?
Log in to reply
Because when x → 3 , then x − 3 = 0 and the denominator → 0 therefore, there is no limit.
You are sure, but it's not important for the question
The key here is 4 x 2 + ( x + 7 ) k − 6 and 2 x 2 − 5 x − 3 have x − 3 as the common factor and must be cancel out (otherwise both part of the fraction will be a multiplication with zero, causing indeterminate form)
x → 3 lim 2 x 2 − 5 x − 3 4 x 2 + k x + 7 k − 6 = x → 3 lim ( 2 x + 1 ) ( x − 3 ) 4 x 2 + k x + 7 k − 6
For the expression to have a limit, 4 x 2 + k x + 7 k − 6 must have ( x − 3 ) as a factor or has the form:
4 x 2 + k x + 7 k − 6 = ( x − 3 ) ( a x + b ) = a x 2 + ( b − 3 a ) x − 3 b
Equating the coefficients:
⎩ ⎪ ⎨ ⎪ ⎧ a = 4 b − 3 a = k 3 b = 6 − 7 k ⇒ b = k + 1 2 ⇒ 3 ( k + 1 2 ) = 6 − 7 k ⇒ 1 0 k = − 3 0 ⇒ k = − 3
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
Notice that if we evaluate this limit without giving regards to k , it will be x → 3 lim 1 8 − 1 5 − 3 4 ( 9 ) + 1 0 k − 6 = 0 3 0 + 1 0 k In this regard, if the denominator is zero but numerator is not zero, this limit will not exist (as 0 x for x = 0 is not determined). If the numerator is zero, we can conclude it to be indeterminate form of 0 0 which may has limit by transformation to other form that can be determinate (whether the transformation will give another indeterminate form or not). This suggests that 3 0 + 1 0 k = 0 ⇒ k = − 3 is a possible solution.
Substituting k = − 3 gives us the limit,
x → 3 lim 2 x 2 − 5 x − 3 4 x 2 − 3 x + 7 ( − 3 ) − 6 = = = = = x → 3 lim 2 x 2 − 5 x − 3 4 x 2 − 3 x − 2 7 x → 3 lim ( 2 x + 1 ) ( x − 3 ) ( x − 3 ) ( 4 x + 9 ) , Factor the quadratic expressions x → 3 lim ( 2 x + 1 ) ( x − 3 ) ( x − 3 ) ( 4 x + 9 ) x → 3 lim 2 x + 1 4 x + 9 2 ( 3 ) + 1 4 ( 3 ) + 9 = 7 2 1 = 3
which is a finite number, thus this result tells us that the limit does indeed exists when k = − 3 .
Footnote : This tells us that when k = − 3 , the limit exists and is equal to 3 ; and when k = − 3 , the limit fails to exist (diverge).