Out of all parallelograms with perimeter 240 units, find the one with maximum area. Enter the area of the found parallelogram as your answer.
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
LOL, the thing I expected you to prove was that first statement you have.
Log in to reply
I skipped the derivation as it was proved by @Ivan Koswara
A parallelogram with side lengths a , b and one of its angles θ has area a b sin θ . This is easy to observe by cutting the parallelogram with one of the diagonals, resulting two congruent triangles with two sides having length a , b and the angle between them being θ (or π − θ ). Thus, fixing a , b , the parallelogram with largest area must have sin θ = 1 or θ = 2 π . Thus our parallelogram must be a rectangle. It's a well-known problem that among rectangles of fixed perimeter, the one with the largest area is a square. Thus the sought shape is a square with side length 6 0 , and thus area 3 6 0 0 .
Simple standard approach.
Ivan, you have assumed that side lengths remain constant, but the question specifies only the perimeter to be constant.
Log in to reply
Indeed. I first fixed the side lengths; I proved that if a parallelogram has side lengths a , b , then to achieve the largest area, it must be a rectangle. However, my choice of a , b is arbitrary. Thus what I proved is actually "a parallelogram that is not a rectangle is not the answer", allowing me to only look at rectangles.
Log in to reply
Well, the question demands that you maximise area not by fixing the side lengths. You were supposed to prove : " A parallelogram with a fixed perimeter, not necessarily having fixed side lengths, will have maximum area if it is a square ". Although I do like you solution, I guess it is flawed for this situation.
It's fairly easy to prove, if you have Calculus. (For those wondering, I tutor students in maths ranging from basic arithmetic through the calculus. Working problems at a variety of levels helps me stay in a good "zone". Additionally, this is the exact topic I am taking in my current calculus class.).
The area of a parallelogram is given by the magnitude of the cross product of vectors that form two adjacent sides.
This is given by |U x V|=|U||V|sin(t), where t is the angle between U and V. We are given that the figure is to be a parallelogram, with perimeter 240. So we know that the lengths of two adjacent sides will be 120. Let the side corresponding to U be length (magnitude) s, so the magnitude of V is 120-s.
This gives an area of s * (120 - s) * sin(t). First, we will find the angle t which maximizes the area. To do this, take a partial derivative with respect to t: d/dt s(120-s)*sin(t) = (s(120 - s)) cos(t). Setting this equal to zero, (s(120-s)) cos(t) = 0
Then either A: s = 0, which does not create a parallelogram
B: 120 - s = 0, or s = 120, which also does not create a parallelogram, or
C: cos(t) = 0, or t = 90 degrees. It follows that the parallelogram in question must be a rectangle.
To maximize the area of a rectangle, we first multiply length and width, as usual: A = s * (120-s) = 120s - s^2. Then we take the derivative of A: dA/ds = 120 - 2s, and set that equal to 0:
120 - 2s = 0, and s = 60. The second side is 120 - 60 = 60.
60*60 = 3600.
QED.
Yup, the way I did.
Let the sides of the parallelogram be equal to a and b . We know that diagonal divides it into 2 triangles of equal areas. Area of one triangle is equal to 2 1 a b sin θ .therefore area of parallelogram is a b sin θ which will be maximum when θ = 9 0 . Which implies it is a rectangle .
a + b = 1 2 0 2 a + b ≥ a b a b ≤ 6 0 ⇒ a b ( m a x ) = 3 6 0 0 Which is the solution.
Let the sides be l and b
l + b >= 2 root(lb)
3600 >= lb
you might be wondering why i choose area to be l.b because square has largest area among parallelogram
Your final inequality is of no use in the question. Maximizing product of sides does not mean you have maximized the area.
Can you explain what you are doing here? Why is the area a b c d ?
Log in to reply
thats a typo. It should be l and b.
Log in to reply
Please edit your solution accordingly to reflect what you are thinking. You can do so by clicking on the "Edit" button at the bottom of the solution.
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
P a r a l l e l o g r a m w i t h m a x i m u m a r e a i s a r e c t a n g l e . L e t t h e l e n g h t a n d b r e a d t h b e l a n d b . l + b = 1 2 0 2 l + b ≥ l b t h e r e f o r e , l b ≤ 6 0 ⇒ l b ( m a x i m u m ) = 3 6 0 0
Moreover, this parallelogram will be a square.