An algebra problem by Manuel Kahayon

Algebra Level 2

Does there exist a function f : R R f: \mathbb{R} \to \mathbb{R} which satisfies

  1. f ( x ) f(x) is bijective;
  2. f ( x ) f(x) is neither non-increasing nor non-decreasing;
  3. f ( f ( x ) ) f\big(f(x)\big) is non-decreasing?
Yes No There exist such functions, but they are discontinuous everywhere This is an open problem

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

6 solutions

Oliver Clarke
Sep 10, 2017

Relevant wiki: Bijection, Injection and Surjection - Problem Solving - Hard

Here's a straightforward example. Let f ( x ) = x f(x) = x when x x is not an integer and f ( x ) = x f(x) = -x when x x is an integer. Clearly f f is a bijection which is neither non-increasing or non-decreasing and f ( f ( x ) ) = x f ( f(x)) = x is non-decreasing.

doesn't fall under the category of discontinous everywhere?

Alperen AYDIN - 3 years, 8 months ago

Log in to reply

The function in the example is discontinuous at all non-zero integers and continuous everywhere else so it is not discontinuous everywhere.

Oliver Clarke - 3 years, 7 months ago

@Alperen AYDIN No it is continuous at some points and discontinuous at others.

Samuel Shadrach - 3 years, 8 months ago
Ronen Katsir
Sep 11, 2017

Relevant wiki: Bijection, Injection and Surjection - Problem Solving - Hard

f(x)=1/x when x != 0 and f(0)=0 seems to be a good example

Simplea and elegant indeed!

Agnishom Chattopadhyay - 3 years, 8 months ago
Manuel Kahayon
Aug 19, 2017

What I've noticed here is the fact that, if g ( x ) g(x) is a function which is a bijection between the nonnegative real numbers (with g ( 0 ) = 0 g(0) = 0 ), then its inverse is also a bijection between the nonnegative real numbers. This implies that f ( x ) = g ( x ) f(x) = -g(x) if x 0 x \geq 0 , f ( x ) = g 1 ( x ) f(x) = g^{-1}(-x) otherwise gives us f ( f ( x ) ) = x f(f(x)) = x for all x.

Let h ( x ) = x h(x) = x if x 0 ( m o d 2 ) \lfloor x \rfloor \equiv 0 \pmod 2 , h ( x ) = x + 2 h(x) = x+2 if x 1 ( m o d 4 ) \lfloor x \rfloor \equiv 1 \pmod 4 , h ( x ) = x 2 h(x) = x-2 if x 3 ( m o d 4 ) \lfloor x \rfloor \equiv 3 \pmod 4 . We can see that by checking cases (or graphing) that h ( x ) h(x) is a bijection between the nonnegative real numbers (with g ( 0 ) = 0 g(0) = 0 ), and h ( x ) h(x) is nonmonotonic. Letting g ( x ) = h ( x ) g(x) = h(x) , we get our desired function f ( x ) f(x) .

So the answer it Yes \boxed{ \text{Yes}} .

P.S. Here is the graph of h ( x ) h(x) to see how I was inspired to construct such a function.

Boi (보이)
Sep 14, 2017

Well...

f ( x ) = { x ( x 0 ) 1 x ( x > 0 ) f(x)=\cases{x~~(x\le0) \\ \dfrac{1}{x}~~(x>0)}

Enough said.

Richard Desper
Sep 13, 2017

There appears to be no shortage of such functions. We are told that f f is neither increasing nor decreasing, and yet it's bijective. Thus the function must have points of discontinuity. Since f f is bijective, f f f \circ f is also bijective. We're told it's non-descreasing, but it's allowed to be increasing. So the obvious thing is to create a function f f such that f ( f ( x ) ) = x f(f(x)) = x .

This is easier to do if we consider a subset of the real line. On ( 0 , 1 ) (0,1) let f ( x ) = 1 x f(x) = 1-x . This function is a bijection of the interval ( 0 , 1 ) (0,1) onto itself. If we compose f f with itself, we see that f ( f ( x ) ) = 1 ( 1 x ) = x f(f(x)) = 1 - (1-x) = x .

We can extend f f to the entire real line by setting f ( x ) = x x + x f(x) = \left \lceil{x} \right \rceil -x + \left \lfloor{x} \right \rfloor . This function is locally decreasing but increasing in the sense that if x y > 1 x - y > 1 then f ( x ) > f ( y ) f(x) > f(y) .

honda1095cm5

Stian Andr'e H Haverstad Hermansen H - 3 years, 9 months ago

Log in to reply

Mechanismo oils watt

Stian Andr'e H Haverstad Hermansen H - 3 years, 9 months ago

Way ytyleti

Stian Andr'e H Haverstad Hermansen H - 3 years, 9 months ago

Goodewelle

Stian Andr'e H Haverstad Hermansen H - 3 years, 9 months ago

The 2. is tricky, but can be read as "not ((not increasing) and (not decreasing))", which is simply "increasing or decreasing". f(x) = x is bijective, increasing and f(f(x)) = x is increasing.

Actually, you are not right here. It should be interpreted as "not ((not increasing everywhere) or (not decreasing everywhere))", which is the same as "(increasing somewhere and decreasing somewhere)". So, your example does not work.

James Wilson - 3 years, 6 months ago

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...