An equable shape's perimeter is numerically equal to its area (ignoring units). For example, a 6 × 3 rectangle has perimeter and area both equal to 1 8 . It's easy to check that this is the only equable rectangle whose width is twice its height.
What is the area of the equable ellipse whose major axis is twice the length of its minor axis?
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
Even I used this approximation!!!
Very nice! That's a ridiculously close approximation; comparing it to the answer found by numerical integration the error is around 0 . 0 0 0 6 % .
Since there's no closed-form expression for the perimeter of an ellipse, numerical methods or approximations are the only way to go. @David Vreken posted a solution using an approximation, so here are a couple of numerical methods.
In both, I'll use a scaling argument, so let's start with that. Let the ellipse with semi-axes a , 2 1 a be E , and let its area be A ( a ) and its perimeter P ( a ) .
Then by similarity, A ( a ) = a 2 ⋅ A ( 1 ) and P ( a ) = a ⋅ P ( 1 ) .
For the ellipse to be equable, a 2 ⋅ A ( 1 ) = a ⋅ P ( 1 )
or, rearranging, a = A ( 1 ) P ( 1 )
Of course, A ( 1 ) = 2 1 π , so a = π 2 P ( 1 )
This means we just need to find P ( 1 ) .
All the methods below give P ( 1 ) ≈ 4 . 8 4 4 2 2 … , which leads to a = π 2 P ( 1 ) = 3 . 0 8 3 9 2 … and A ( a ) = 1 4 . 9 3 9 2 4 … .
Method 1 : non-calculus
We can draw the ellipse E with the equations x ( t ) = cos t and y ( t ) = 2 1 sin t . Letting t k = n 2 π k ,
P ( 1 ) ≈ k = 0 ∑ n − 1 ( x ( t k + 1 ) − x ( t k + 1 ) ) 2 + ( y ( t k + 1 ) − y ( t k + 1 ) ) 2
For various n values, we get:
n | P ( 1 ) approx |
1 0 | 4 . 7 6 5 9 2 9 4 5 1 0 4 2 1 7 |
1 0 0 | 4 . 8 4 3 4 2 7 3 0 6 6 6 8 8 9 |
1 0 0 0 | 4 . 8 4 4 2 1 6 1 4 1 8 4 8 5 |
1 0 0 0 0 0 0 | 4 . 8 4 4 2 2 4 1 1 0 2 6 5 9 |
Method 2 : calculus
From the same parameterisation, P ( 1 ) = 4 ∫ 0 2 π x ˙ 2 + y ˙ 2 d t = 4 ∫ 0 2 π cos 2 t + 4 1 sin 2 t d t = 2 ∫ 0 2 π 4 cos 2 t + sin 2 t d t = 2 ∫ 0 2 π 1 + 3 cos 2 t d t
and we can use numerical integration here, or Wolfram|Alpha. Incidentally, this is a complete elliptic integral of the second kind.
Method 3 : AGM
See, for instance, here for an explanation of a rapidly converging algorithm using the arithmetic-geometric mean to evaluate P ( 1 ) .
Great! Satisfied. Thanks.
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
This is not an exact solution but is a quick way to get close enough to the correct answer.
Since the major axis is twice the length of its minor axis, a = 2 b .
The area of the ellipse is A = π a b , and substituting a = 2 b gives A = 2 π b 2 .
A Ramanujan approximation of the perimeter of an ellipse is P ≈ π ( 3 ( a + b ) − ( 3 a + b ) ( a + 3 b ) ) , and substituting a = 2 b gives P ≈ π b ( 9 − 3 5 ) .
Therefore, 2 π b 2 ≈ π b ( 9 − 3 5 ) , which solves to b ≈ 2 1 ( 9 − 3 5 ) , which means that A ≈ 2 π ( 2 1 ( 9 − 3 5 ) ) 2 ≈ 1 4 . 9 3 9 .