If we have the angle bisectors of a triangle equal, is the triangle necessarily isosceles?
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
Lemma 1:
If two chords of a circle subtend different acute angles at points on the circle, the smaller angle belongs to the shorter chord.
Proof: Two equal chords subtend equal angles at the centre and equal angles (half as big) at suitable points on the circumference. Of two unequal chords, the shorter one would subtend a smaller angle at the centre since it is further away from it than the larger chord.. Consequently, we get a smaller acute angle at the circumference of the circle.
Lemma 2:
If a triangle has two different angles, the smaller angle has the longer bisector.
Proof: Let A B C be a triangle with b < c . Let B E and C F be the angle bisectors at B and c respectively. We wish to prove that B E > C F . Take E ′ on B E such that ∠ E ′ C F = 2 ∠ A B C . Since this is equal to ∠ E ′ B N , we have that F , B , C and E ′ are cyclic.
Since ∠ A B C < 2 ∠ A B C + ∠ A C B < 2 ∠ A B C + ∠ A C B + ∠ B A C , we get ∠ C B F < ∠ E ′ C B < 9 0 ∘ .
By Lemma 1, we get C F < E ′ B . Hence B E > B E ′ > C N .
Thus we have proven Lemma 2. By taking the contrapositive of this lemma, we get that if two angle bisectors are equal, the triangle has 2 equal angles, so it is isosceles.