Equal but different

In a round robin tournament with N N teams, every 2 teams play in a head-to-head match. Points are awarded as follows: 3 points for a win, 1 points for a tie and 0 points for a loss.

What is the smallest value of N N , such that it is possible for all the teams to have the same number of points, but for (at least) two teams to win a different number of matches?


The answer is 8.

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

2 solutions

Mark Hennings
Oct 9, 2013

Suppose that a round-robin tournament can be played amongst n n teams so that each team scores the same number S S of points, but not every team has the same number of wins. Suppose that team i i wins W i W_i games, draws D i D_i games and loses L i L_i games, with W i + D i + L i = n 1 W_i+D_i+L_i = n-1 for each 1 i n 1 \le i \le n . Since the number of won games must equal the number of lost games, we deduce that i W i = i L i \sum_i W_i \,=\, \sum_iL_i .

If W i L i W_i \le L_i for all 1 i n 1 \le i \le n , the fact that i W i = i L i \sum_i W_i = \sum_iL_i would imply that W i = L i W_i = L_i for all 1 i n 1 \le i \le n . Then team i i would score 3 W i + ( n 1 W i L i ) = W i + n 1 3W_i + (n-1-W_i-L_i) \,=\, W_i + n-1 and hence all teams would have the same number of wins, which is not possible. Thus there must exist 1 α n 1 \le \alpha \le n such that W α > L α W_\alpha > L_\alpha . This team (and hence all teams) scores S = 3 W α + ( n 1 W α L α ) = 2 W α L α + n 1 S \,=\, 3W_\alpha + (n-1-W_\alpha-L_\alpha) \,=\, 2W_\alpha - L_\alpha + n-1 , and hence S > W α + n 1 > n S > W_\alpha + n-1 > n . Thus S n + 1 S \ge n+1 .

Similarly, if W i L i W_i \ge L_i for all 1 i n 1 \le i \le n , the fact that i W i = i L i \sum_iW_i = \sum_iL_i would imply that W i = L i W_i = L_i for all 1 i n 1 \le i \le n , which we have already seen is impossible. Thus there must exist 1 β n 1 \le \beta \le n such that W β < L β W_\beta < L_\beta . This team scores S = 2 W β + n 1 L β S = 2W_\beta + n-1 - L_\beta , and hence 2 W β + n 1 L β n + 1 2 W β L β 2 2 W β L β + 2 > W β + 2 W β > 2 \begin{array}{rcl} 2W_\beta + n-1 - L_\beta & \ge & n+1 \\ 2W_\beta - L_\beta & \ge & 2 \\ 2W_\beta & \ge & L_\beta + 2 \; > \; W_\beta + 2\\ W_\beta & > & 2 \end{array} so that W β 3 W_\beta \ge 3 , and hence L β 4 L_\beta \ge 4 . Thus team β \beta plays at least 7 7 games, and hence n 8 n \ge 8 .

On the other hand, it is possible to have a round-robin tournament of 8 8 teams where all the conditions are satisfied, as the following table of results shows: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 W D L P 1 × D D L W W L D 2 3 2 9 2 D × D W L W L D 2 3 2 9 3 D D × W W L L D 2 3 2 9 4 W L L × D D W D 2 3 2 9 5 L W L D × D W D 2 3 2 9 6 L L W D D × W D 2 3 2 9 7 W W W L L L × L 3 0 4 9 8 D D D D D D W × 1 6 0 9 \begin{array}{|c|cccccccc|ccc|c|} \hline & 1 & 2 & 3 & 4 & 5 & 6 & 7 & 8 & W & D & L & P \\ \hline 1 & \times & D & D & L & W & W & L & D & 2 & 3 & 2 & 9 \\ 2 & D & \times & D & W & L & W & L & D & 2 & 3 & 2 & 9 \\ 3 & D & D & \times & W & W & L & L & D & 2 & 3 & 2 & 9 \\ 4 & W & L & L & \times & D & D & W & D & 2 & 3 & 2 & 9 \\ 5 & L & W & L & D & \times & D & W & D & 2 & 3 & 2 & 9 \\ 6 & L & L & W & D & D & \times & W & D & 2 & 3 & 2 & 9 \\ 7 & W & W & W & L & L & L & \times & L & 3 & 0 & 4 & 9 \\ 8 & D & D & D & D & D & D & W & \times & 1 & 6 & 0 & 9 \\ \hline \end{array} Thus 8 8 is the smallest number of teams in a round-robin tournament in which it is possible for all teams to end up with the same point score, but for at least two teams to have different numbers of wins.

Two typos. In paragraph 2, the first inequality W i L i W_i \ge L_i should read W i L i W_i \le L_i . In paragraph 3, the first inequality W i L i W_i \le L_i should read W i L i W_i \ge L_i .

Mark Hennings - 7 years, 8 months ago

Log in to reply

Updated. Interesting approach.

Calvin Lin Staff - 7 years, 8 months ago
Matt McNabb
Oct 7, 2013

Firstly, there is a possible solution with N = 8 N=\boxed{8} : crosstable linked

Now we will show that there is no possible smaller solution. Suppose N < 8 N<8 .

Let w w be the number of matches won, out of the total number of matches which is N ( N 1 ) 2 N(N-1) \over 2 . Consider the total score (sum of all teams' scores). A won game contributes 3 3 and a tie contributes 2 2 . So the total score is 3 w 2 ( N ( N 1 ) 2 w ) = w N ( N 1 ) = N ( w N ( N 1 ) ) \begin{aligned} &3w - 2( {N(N-1) \over 2} - w ) \\ = &w - N(N-1) \\ = &N({w \over N} - (N-1)) \end{aligned}

Since each team finishes on the same score, each team's score must be k + N 1 k + N - 1 where k = w N k = {w \over N} .

Further, the mean number of wins for each team is k k . Since it's stipulated that not all teams finish on the same score, there must be a team with more than k k wins (let's call that team W W ) and a team with fewer than k k wins, called L L . If there are more than one possible team in each case here just choose one of them.

Suppose that the difference in number of wins between W W and L L is more than 2 2 . Then their difference in score from wins is at least 9 9 , so L L must tie at least 9 9 games to match W W 's score. Since N < 8 N<8 , this is not possible. So we can conclude that W W wins k + 1 k+1 games and L L wins k 1 k-1 games.

Let d d be the number of games tied by W W . To make their scores match, L L must tie d + 6 d+6 games. So team L L has: k 1 wins d + 6 ties ( N 1 ) ( k + d + 5 ) losses k-1 \mbox{ wins} \\ d+6 \mbox{ ties} \\ (N-1) - (k+d+5) \mbox{ losses} The last line lets us conclude that N k + d + 6 N \ge k+d+6

Now, the score for L L is 3 ( k 1 ) + ( d + 6 ) = 3 k + d + 3 3(k-1) + (d+6) = 3k + d + 3 . But we already worked out that each player's score is k + N 1 k + N - 1 . So

k + N 1 = 3 k + d + 3 N = 2 k + d + 4 k + d + 6 2 k + d + 4 2 k 8 + d N \begin{aligned} k+N-1 &= 3k+d+3 \\ N &= 2k + d + 4 \\ k + d + 6 &\le 2k + d + 4 \\ 2 &\le k \\ 8+d &\le N \end{aligned}

Since d 0 d \ge 0 we have proven that N 8 N \ge 8 .

These values gave me the hint to start building the crosstable: team W W has 3 3 wins and 4 4 losses; and L L has 1 1 win, 6 6 ties. Therefore L L must have beaten W W and the other teams are easy to fill out by inspection.

Oops, typo - each team's score is k + N 1 k + N - 1 , not k N + 1 k - N + 1 ; the - should be a + + all the way through that calculation.

Matt McNabb - 7 years, 8 months ago

The analysis can be simplified slightly by using a different scoring system. Points are awarded as follows: 2 points for a win, 0 points for a tie, -1 points for a loss. This doesn't change the answer, but makes the following analysis easier. It avoids the clumsiness of accounting for N N , and makes the argument easier to notice.

Calvin Lin Staff - 7 years, 8 months ago

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...