( x − 1 ) ( x − 2 ) ( 3 x − 2 ) ( 3 x + 1 ) = 2 1
How many irrational roots exists for the above equation ?
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
No, I don't know what you mean. A=? I did it by expanding the expression and then completing the square, and I got ( 3 x 2 − 5 x ) = ± 5 and then solved the four equations obtained.
Log in to reply
( x − 1 ) ( 3 x − 2 ) = 3 x 2 − 5 x + 2 , ( x − 2 ) ( 3 x + 1 ) = 3 x 2 − 5 x − 2
Then he substituted A = 3 x 2 − 5 x
Even simpler it can have 4 irrational roots at max... Irrational roots always exist pairs so it would be 2 or 4.. I cannotuunderstand why it isn't 4
( x − 1 ) ( x − 2 ) ( 3 x − 2 ) ( 3 x + 1 ) = 2 1 ⇒ 9 x 4 − 3 0 x 3 + 2 5 x 2 − 2 5 = 0 Using Lodovico Ferrari's Method, we can find the roots of this polynomial: ⇒ x = 6 5 ± 8 5 ∨ 6 5 ± i 3 5 Since two of these roots are irrational the answer is 2 .
Can you explain what is the Lodovico Ferrari's method, and how you applied it?
9 x 4 − 3 0 x 3 + 2 5 x 2 − 2 5 = 0
Divide by 9
x 4 − 3 1 0 x 3 + 9 2 5 x 2 − 9 2 5 = 0
Getting rid of x 3
6 5 = 4 3 1 0 x = y + 6 5
Ferrari’s method is not even needed here.
y 4 − 2 5 1 8 y 2 − 1 2 9 6 2 9 7 5 = 0
Using Quadratic Formula we get:
y = 6 ± 8 5 ∨ 6 ± i 3 5
x = 6 5 ± 8 5 ∨ 6 5 ± i 3 5
I’m too lazy to explain the Ferrari’s Method, but here is an url where explanation can be found:
http://mathforum.org/library/drmath/view/51899.html
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
Solving,
[(x-1)(3x-2)] and [(x-2)(3x+1)] separately and Substituting "A" For What You Know What I Mean We Get
(A-2)(A+2) = 21
Which gives A= 5 or -5 Which gives us 4 equations ....... Solving We Get 2 Complex And 2 Irrational Roots