Hemispherical bowl For "Thirsty Crows"

Consider an Hollow uniform Hemispherical bowl , which is placed on a rough surfaces( each surface has coefficient of friction μ \mu ) .This hemispherical bowl is used for the purpose of drinking source for Birds and Crow etc. For to comfortable drinking This Bowl must be in equilibrium .


For equilibrium this bowl satisfy the relation :

sin θ = α μ ( μ + β ) μ γ + δ \sin { \theta } \quad =\quad \alpha \cfrac { \mu (\mu +\beta ) }{ { \mu }^{ \gamma }\quad +\quad \delta } .


Then Find the value of α + β + γ + δ \alpha +\beta +\gamma +\delta ?


Details And Assumptions

\bullet Take Centre of mass of Hollow hemisphere at R 2 \cfrac { R }{ 2 } from base diameter. ( If needed )

\bullet Assume that bowl is raised to that much angle which is maximum possible ( which means that is at the verge of slipping )


This is part of my set Deepanshu's Mechanics Blasts


The answer is 6.

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

2 solutions

Mvs Saketh
Nov 27, 2014

The interesting thing about this problem is that we dont have to locate the distance of contact points from the centre of mass OR consider the torques of the normal reactions simply because this is a hemisphere, we will soon see why so.

Let us consider the equllibrium of the hemisphere,

we have the following forces

1) Normal reaction of floor (lets call it N1)

2) Normal reaction of wall (N2)

3) Friction at ground (f1)

4) friction at wall (f2) (let us assume it is upward)

5) Gravity through COM located at R/2

Now we have using translation equllibirum condition

m g = N 1 + μ N 2 μ N 1 = N 2 mg={ N }_{ 1 }+\mu { N }_{ 2 }\\ \mu { N }_{ 1 }={ N }_{ 2 }\\

solving them we get

N 2 = m g μ 1 + μ 2 { N }_{ 2 }=\frac { mg\mu }{ 1+{ \mu }^{ 2 } } \\

now the interesting part occurs,, let us consider the rotational equllibrium about the centre of hemisphere (not COM) (the centre of base instead)

and why ? because the torques due to normal reactions about that point is 0 because all lines normal to the surface of a sphere pass through the centre, and so we dont have to care about the points of contact and their location, also the frictional forces are perpendicular to the radii so it is easy to evaluate their torques

Now, about the COM, we have to consider torques due to gravity and friction

so we have

m g R 2 s i n θ = ( f 1 + f 2 ) R = ( μ ) ( N 1 + N 2 ) R = μ ( 1 + μ ) ( N 2 ) R = m g μ ( 1 + μ ) 1 + μ 2 R mg\frac { R }{ 2 } sin\theta =\left( { f }_{ 1 }+{ f }_{ 2 } \right) R=(\mu )({ N }_{ 1 }+{ N }_{ 2 })R=\mu (1+\mu )({ N }_{ 2 })R=\frac { mg\mu (1+\mu ) }{ 1+{ \mu }^{ 2 } } R\\

or s i n θ = 2 μ ( 1 + μ ) 1 + μ 2 sin\theta =2\frac { \mu (1+\mu ) }{ 1+{ \mu }^{ 2 } } \\

thus we get the answer

totally exactly microscopically ditto as mine. Oh god exactly same even the equations and words. And one thing more If object is in both linear and rotational equilibrium then τ n e t \overrightarrow { { \tau }_{ net } } =0.

But if object is in only Rotational equilibrium then only τ n e t \overrightarrow { { \tau }_{ net } } about COM =0.

I added this for someone who reads your solution and does not know much about such cases. BTW nice solution and great question.

Gautam Sharma - 6 years, 5 months ago

I wonder whether we can simply equate f to normal reaction times 'mu'. Due to verge of slipping condition we might be able to do that at one of the contact points, but not at both. If we solve it using inequlities (f <= Nu ) then we get a range... Plus we have to consider cases ( as to which contact point is more prone to slipping).

Adwait Godbole - 5 years, 10 months ago

The click lies in taking torque about centre so that things are simplified a bit.

Nishant Sharma - 6 years, 6 months ago

don't take torques about c.o.m rather centre of the sphere should be taken as the reference point since normal reactions will pass through that and will make it easy to do so ! and as usual the torques and normal forces balance for transitional and rotational equilibrium ! you get a=2, b=1 , y=2 , d=1 ! nice problem !

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...