Euler gone wild, again

a 11763 a 3 ( m o d 25725 ) \large a^{11763}\equiv{a^3}\pmod{25725}

How many integers a a with 1 a 1000 1\leq{a}\leq1000 satisfy the congruency above?


Inspiration


The answer is 1000.

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

2 solutions

Otto Bretscher
May 20, 2015

We will show that this congruency holds for all positive integers a a , so that the answer to our puzzle here is 1000 . \boxed{1000}.

We have the prime factorization n = 25725 = 3 × 5 2 × 7 3 = 3 × 25 × 343 n=25725=3\times{5^2}\times7^3=3\times{25}\times{343} . The given congruency holds modulo 25725 if (and only if) it holds modulo 3, 25, and 343. We will examine the case 343; the other two cases are analogous.

If 7 does not divide a a , then Euler's theorem gives a ϕ ( 343 ) = a 294 1 ( m o d 343 ) a^{\phi(343)}=a^{294}\equiv1 \pmod{343} so a 11760 = a 294 × 40 1 a^{11760}=a^{294\times40}\equiv1 and a 11763 a 3 ( m o d 343 ) a^{11763}\equiv{a^3}\pmod{343} as claimed. If 7 divides a a , then 7 3 = 343 7^3=343 will divide a 3 a^3 , so that a 11763 0 a^{11763}\equiv{0} a 3 ( m o d 343 ) . \equiv{a^3}\pmod{343}.

Or we can use this Corollary to Euler's Theorem. As it often happens in Math, it is easier to prove the Corollary and apply it to this special case than to deal with the special case with all its messy numbers.

I have a computer science approach.

Kunal Verma - 6 years ago
Patrick Corn
May 20, 2015

This is true for any a a relatively prime to 25725 = 3 5 2 7 3 25725 = 3 \cdot 5^2 \cdot 7^3 by Euler's Theorem (since φ ( 25725 ) = 11760 \varphi(25725) = 11760 ).

It's also true for a = 7 a = 7 because the two sides are congruent to 0 0 mod 7 3 7^3 and congruent to each other mod 3 5 2 3 \cdot 5^2 by Euler again, so they're congruent modulo the product by the Chinese Remainder Theorem. A similar argument works for a = 5 a = 5 and a = 3 a = 3 .

Now if the statement is true for b b and true for c c , it's true for b c bc . So the above two paragraphs imply that it's true for all a a ; the answer is 1000 \fbox{1000} .

Nice approach! I certainly agree that it suffices to prove it for primes. However, your first statement, "This is true for a = 3 , 5 , 7 a=3,5,7 because both sides are congruent to 0" does not hold modulo 25725... you need to elaborate more. (In my own solution, I'm trying to work around this problem.)

Otto Bretscher - 6 years ago

Log in to reply

Ah, good point; I will edit.

Patrick Corn - 6 years ago

Log in to reply

Great edit! Just to make sure that everything is clear to our readers: In the case of a = 7 a=7 , how do you know that both sides are congruent modulo 75. Can you show one more step, how you get up to 11763 or at least 11760?

Otto Bretscher - 6 years ago

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...