a 1 1 7 6 3 ≡ a 3 ( m o d 2 5 7 2 5 )
How many integers a with 1 ≤ a ≤ 1 0 0 0 satisfy the congruency above?
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
I have a computer science approach.
This is true for any a relatively prime to 2 5 7 2 5 = 3 ⋅ 5 2 ⋅ 7 3 by Euler's Theorem (since φ ( 2 5 7 2 5 ) = 1 1 7 6 0 ).
It's also true for a = 7 because the two sides are congruent to 0 mod 7 3 and congruent to each other mod 3 ⋅ 5 2 by Euler again, so they're congruent modulo the product by the Chinese Remainder Theorem. A similar argument works for a = 5 and a = 3 .
Now if the statement is true for b and true for c , it's true for b c . So the above two paragraphs imply that it's true for all a ; the answer is 1 0 0 0 .
Nice approach! I certainly agree that it suffices to prove it for primes. However, your first statement, "This is true for a = 3 , 5 , 7 because both sides are congruent to 0" does not hold modulo 25725... you need to elaborate more. (In my own solution, I'm trying to work around this problem.)
Log in to reply
Ah, good point; I will edit.
Log in to reply
Great edit! Just to make sure that everything is clear to our readers: In the case of a = 7 , how do you know that both sides are congruent modulo 75. Can you show one more step, how you get up to 11763 or at least 11760?
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
We will show that this congruency holds for all positive integers a , so that the answer to our puzzle here is 1 0 0 0 .
We have the prime factorization n = 2 5 7 2 5 = 3 × 5 2 × 7 3 = 3 × 2 5 × 3 4 3 . The given congruency holds modulo 25725 if (and only if) it holds modulo 3, 25, and 343. We will examine the case 343; the other two cases are analogous.
If 7 does not divide a , then Euler's theorem gives a ϕ ( 3 4 3 ) = a 2 9 4 ≡ 1 ( m o d 3 4 3 ) so a 1 1 7 6 0 = a 2 9 4 × 4 0 ≡ 1 and a 1 1 7 6 3 ≡ a 3 ( m o d 3 4 3 ) as claimed. If 7 divides a , then 7 3 = 3 4 3 will divide a 3 , so that a 1 1 7 6 3 ≡ 0 ≡ a 3 ( m o d 3 4 3 ) .
Or we can use this Corollary to Euler's Theorem. As it often happens in Math, it is easier to prove the Corollary and apply it to this special case than to deal with the special case with all its messy numbers.